New Delhi may get dragged into tussles - Chinese Media

[PaklovesTurkiye]

I dont see the concern the author has. He admits India is doing well.



Maybe India does not want itself to get ' roped in" .

All the best, then

Fools do these things when they are out of logic Mr.

Arguing with a fool proves there are two........

 

[chanikya]

All the best, then



Arguing with a fool proves there are two........

So ultimately u accepted u are

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

It is a tragedy for the US lovers in Pakistan, they want the sweet attention of handsome uncle sam but uncle sam finds those darker indians more attractive. I feel pity for these Pakistanis. Well, uncle sam has made it clear on numerous occasions what Pakistan could do to get the 'sweet attention' of uncle sam. Is Pakistan ready? If not why do Pakistanis belittle themselves with this kind of posts?

I don't get it. No one is lover of US over here. We have security relations with them and far more greater economic relations with China. From officials to common people, we all know US is not our friend nor enemy. China is rising and will have more influence on Pakistan than US in near future.

So ultimately u accepted u are

You are fool too if you have really read my post. We both are fools and I am very happy about it.

 

[chanikya]

I don't get it. No one is lover of US over here. We have security relations with them and far more greater economic relations with China. From officials to common people, we all know US is not our friend nor enemy. China is rising and will have more influence on Pakistan than US in near future.



You are fool too if you have really read my post. We both are fools and I am very happy about it.

That's what I said which u accepted, I didnt, its a twist of words in which we advocates are gud at

 

[A$HU]

It is a tragedy for the US lovers in Pakistan, they want the sweet attention of handsome uncle sam but uncle sam finds those darker indians more attractive. I feel pity for these Pakistanis. Well, uncle sam has made it clear on numerous occasions what Pakistan could do to get the 'sweet attention' of uncle sam. Is Pakistan ready? If not why do Pakistanis belittle themselves with this kind of posts?

Darker indians..huh. Good education you got there.

 

[dray]

By Zhou Fangyin Source:Global Times Published: 2016-4-24 23:43:01

​

llustration: Liu Rui/GT

On April 18, the foreign ministers of China, Russia and India met in Moscow for the 14th trilateral foreign ministers meeting and issued a joint communiqué. The three countries promised to maintain maritime order based on international law and agreed that all disputes should be solved through negotiations by claimant countries. The communiqué stated a common stance toward the simmering tensions in the South China Sea and showed their expectation for a negotiated result to solve territorial disputes.

Having established a comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination, China-Russia relations have warmed up in the past two years and Russia has expressed understanding and support for China's stance in the South China Sea. But India's attitude is tricky.

Indian diplomacy rests on engagement with major world powers instead of clinging to a particular country. By adopting an ambiguous strategy, India places itself in a position that all the major powers woo it, but it never explicitly promises anything regarding the policies of other nations.

This makes these countries hope about wooing India while not willing to break ties with it due to its ambiguous stance. India has been trying to maximize its interests with minimum costs, which so far has achieved satisfying results.

For years, India has remained a prudent yet ambiguous stance over the South China Sea issue. At a sensitive moment such as now, India expressed the same attitude as China and Russia, indicating a changing state of mind of India. Why is the case?

One possible reason is that India has been striving for full-fledged membership of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). In July 2015, the SCO Ufa summit launched the process of accession for India and Pakistan. But India's inclusion into the SCO has not been completed. India needs to prove that its accession can play a constructive role for the unity of SCO members and the international effect of the SCO.

In addition, what rights India will be entitled to after it enters the SCO will be determined by the existing members. Against this backdrop, India taking a consistent stance with China and Russia in diplomatic matters will facilitate its accession to the SCO and help it better play its role within this regional framework.

This may be part of India's consideration. It's noteworthy that days before the joint communiqué, US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter announced that the US and India agreed in principle to share military logistics during his tour in India on April 10-12. His Indian counterpart Manohar Parrikar said the two countries will sign an agreement in a few months. The signing will mark a considerable change in India's foreign policy, a big step in binding the two at least in military cooperation. The agreement doesn't necessarily mean to target China or Russia, but it definitely pleases neither.

By joining the communiqué in support of China's stance on the South China Sea, India seemingly tries to strike a diplomatic balance at a high level. Yet it doesn't connote any change in India's diplomatic intentions to seek a balance between powers. India's moves to substantively bolster the US in military cooperation and meanwhile disappoint the latter right before the South China Sea arbitration outcome is released indicates the duality of India's policy. They show that India also takes a two-sided stance in dealing with China.

India's moves of this kind are not unwise. But to keep doing it in a changing world is not easy, and instead will satisfy no power that wants to rope in India. While India has to take a stance in coping with powers to get its anticipated gains, it may end up in being involved in tussles that it originally wants to stay away from. From this perspective, it is fair to question whether India's practice is indeed commendable.

The author is a professor at the Guangdong Research Institute for International Strategies.opinion@globaltimes.com.cn Follow us on Twitter @GTopinion

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/979873.shtml

the above pic probably describing India.....

It is for China to decide if it wants to align itself with the major south Asian powers, or it wants to poke its powerful neighbours and get screwed in return. The arrogant tone of this article won't help China in any manner.

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

It is for China to decide if it wants to align itself with the major south Asian powers, or it wants to poke its powerful neighbours and get screwed in return. The arrogant tone of this article won't help China in any manner.

Your post is arrogant too.....

 

[dray]

Your post is arrogant too.....

That's counter-arrogance..

 

[xyxmt]

why is everyone fighting poor Indians, leave them alone

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

That's counter-arrogance..

India can't hold arrogance in front of China for too long. China is too big for India. India is good at smaller countries around her.

 

[dray]

India can't hold arrogance in front of China for too long. China is too big for India. India is good at smaller countries around her.

Both the countries are too big for each other, that's why we can keep exploring oil at disputed Vietnam waters in scs, welcome eight Chinese, Tibetan and uighur dissidents in Dharamshala, and enjoy the natural beauty of Tawang.

 

[BattleWolf]

Darker ? we are Black Skinned people.
https://www.google.co.in/search?q=h...biw=1366&bih=667#tbm=isch&q=dravidian+Indians

No , first of the entire Aryan /Dravidian theory is a long debunked controversy .

A Dravidian is historically referred to as blacks who migrated to the subcontinent 10,000+ years ago from Africa . ie the search result usually shows dark skinned south Tamils & Kerala . Its the same reason you find white-albino people when you search Aryan indian .

south Indians are brown skinned people not black , this is what a merged image of a average north & south indian looks like

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

This one ?

Replace Gujarat with India...

not actually we can still "contain" China if we have to, all we have to do is Give Nuke and MRBM tech to Countries like Vietnam and Philippines. our only Enemy is already receiving Technical Help from China i am sure we can Retain favor if we have to.

Remember my Pakistani Friend, We have noting to loose

You should only be guilty yourself if you don't have good relations with China. You just can't play hardball with China, cuz you'll get panicked just like you did recently. Elephant phus hogaya...... Pakistan already didn't get impress by you, now other smaller nations are in the club too.

Logistics agreement with US shows you don't have any regard for your neighbors. Now, you have lost the right to complain if they get angry with you.

 

[Jamwal's]

A snake would be more appropriate. A snake speaks with a forked tongue.

Ironically, China is known as "dragon" which is basically a reptile.

 

[Tiger Genie]

Us has its interests, China its ad India theirs. So thy push an jostle and hug and hustle.
Little countries run around to grab some morsels here and there.