What's new

Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose wanted ruthless dictatorship in India for 20 years

Chanakya's_Chant

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
3,395
Reaction score
28
Country
India
Location
India
Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose wanted ruthless dictatorship in India for 20 years

Recent allegations about a newly independent India under Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru snooping on the kin of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose is what conspiracy theorists and spin doctors needed to push their agenda — that Netaji was a greater patriot than Pandit Nehru. The "see-I-told-you" band of people, some of them public intellectuals, have kept the media and political circles abuzz with all sorts of activity ever since.

Every day, someone or the other claims to know what really happened to Bose and blames Pandit Nehru and the Congress for it. Any narrative or opinion that runs contrary to this new perception is immediately denounced as a work of traitors. However, Bose's admirers conveniently ignore his Faustian treaty with Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan.

Netaji Bose, by his own admission in his book, "Indian Struggle" (published in 1935 in London), believed India needed a political system that was a mix of fascism and communism — something that he called samyavad. Netaji made a special trip to Rome in 1935 to present a copy of his book to Italian dictator Benito Mussolini, whom he greatly admired and whose ideals he would follow for the rest of his life. Bose's reactionary views naturally brought him into conflict with the pacifist leaders of Congress, most notably Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru. But the friction didn't happen in 1935, it happened much earlier.

READ ALSO: What if Netaji had returned to India ...

Bose had organized the annual session of the Indian National Congress in 1928 in Calcutta. There, he organized a guard of honour in full military style—over 2,000 volunteers were drilled in military fashion and organized into battalions; half of them wore military uniforms with "officers" wearing metal epaulettes. For himself, Bose got a senior British military officer's dress tailored by Calcutta-based British firm, Harman's, complemented by an aiguillette and a field marshal's baton; he also assumed the title of general officer commanding, much to the chagrin of Gandhi, who described the whole thing as 'Bertram Mills circus'. But Bose's love for militarism continued just like his love for a good show.

46980548.cms

Subhas Chandra Bose (in military uniform) with Motilal Nehru at the Calcutta session of the Indian National Congress in December 1928.

In 1938, at the 51st session of the Congress at Haripura, Bose was the president. He organized for himself a grand ceremony that was no less than a victory march of a triumphant ancient Indian king returning from digvijaya. He supposedly entered the venue in a chariot drawn by 51 bullocks, accompanied by 51 girls in saffron saris, after a two-hour procession through 51 gates that also had 51 brass bands playing. He would do similar shows in Southeast Asia when he came to the helm of Indian National Army and Indian Independence League.

READ ALSO: 64 Netaji files locked up in 'secret cell' in Kolkata

In October 1943, Bose announced the formation of the Provisional Government of Free India (Arzi Hukumat-i-Azad Hind). He arbitrarily assumed the titles of head of state, prime minister, and minister for war and foreign affairs — the first he intended to keep when India was liberated. He demanded total submission and fealty from Indians everywhere; anybody who opposed him, his army or government could be executed (some accounts suggest many were indeed tortured or executed on orders of Bose or with his knowledge).

The INA's proclamation put this into writing: "If any person fails to understand the intentions of the Provisional Government of Azad Hind and the Indian National Army, or of our Ally, the Nippon Army, and dares to commit such acts as are itemized hereunder which would hamper the sacred task of emancipating India, he shall be executed or severely punished in accordance with the Criminal Law of the Provisional Government of Azad Hind and the Indian National Army or with the Martial Law of the Nippon Army."

READ ALSO: PM Modi to 'personally' look into Netaji files

In a speech the same year in Singapore, Bose spoke about India needing a ruthless dictator for 20 years after liberation. Then Singapore daily, Sunday Express (now defunct), printed his speech where he said, "So long as there is a third party, ie the British, these dissensions will not end. These will go on growing. They will disappear only when an iron dictator rules over India for 20 years. For a few years at least, after the end of British rule in India, there must be a dictatorship...No other constitution can flourish in this country and it is so to India's good that she shall be ruled by a dictator, to begin with ..."

46980585.cms

Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose (right) with Mahatma Gandhi in February 1938.


By this time, Netaji seems to have liked Nazism more than Fascism. In a speech to students of Tokyo University in 1944, Netaji said India needs to have a philosophy that "should be a synthesis between national socialism (Nazism) and communism". Around this time, of course, any form of cordiality that existed between Bose and Pandit Nehru had evaporated.

READ ALSO: Stalin killed Netaji, Subramanian Swamy says

While Bose fancied himself as a world leader like Hitler and Mussolini, Pandit Nehru despised both individuals and their ideologies. He expressed his "intense dislike" for Fascism and said there can be no middle path between fascism and communism, the former being a "crude and brutal effort of the capitalist order".

Nevertheless, after Bose "died" in that mysterious air crash in August 1945, Pandit Nehru paid a tribute to his former colleague, "In the struggle for the cause of India's independence he has given his life and has escaped all those troubles which brave soldiers like him have to face in the end. He was not only brave but had deep love for freedom. He believed, rightly or wrongly, that whatever he did was for the independence of India ... Although I personally did not agree with him in many respects, and he left us and formed the Forward Bloc, nobody can doubt his sincerity. He struggled throughout his life for the independence of India, in his own way."

Source:- Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose wanted ruthless dictatorship in India for 20 years - The Times of India
 
.
India needed 2-3 decades of dictatorship to make a strong military and economy policy to thrive in the long term. The democracy we got under the Neheruvian decades was lost pleasing every other foreign powers with our pants down, while fooling the ignorant masses in lieu of chicken and daaru, and the semi educated masses with grandiose schemes of socialism.
 
.
India needed 2-3 decades of dictatorship to make a strong military and economy policy to thrive in the long term. The democracy we got under the Neheruvian decades was lost pleasing every other foreign powers with our pants down, while fooling the ignorant masses in lieu of chicken and daaru, and the semi educated masses with grandiose schemes of socialism.

#kisaanvirodhinarendramodi is trending on twitter , when i see this i feel we do need authoritarian rule for a few years , few indians need to be spanked.
 
.
Well, you never know what would have happened had India been under dictatorship until the late 60s. With democracy under weak leaders (except Indira) instead of dictatorship under the likes of Bose, maybe India lost the opportunity to disintegrate Pakistan before it developed the bomb. Maybe India lost the opportunity to liberate Tibet before the Dragon grew up. You never know... ;)
 
.
#kisaanvirodhinarendramodi is trending on twitter , when i see this i feel we do need authoritarian rule for a few years , few indians need to be spanked.

That's why we gave modi such a mandate,. We need at least a decade of mold dictatorship or authoritarian rule

Btw this article is nothing but Presstitution
 
. .
That's why we gave modi such a mandate,. We need at least a decade of mold dictatorship or authoritarian rule

Btw this article is nothing but Presstitution

Nothing wrong in that...For India after independence first 20 year was very important, we missed that 20 year....This is the reason today we are struggling like anything.

Folks..let's not get carried away...Dictatorship under the rule of Netaji might sound great to some of us here however what we are missing here is the flip side...A country under dictatorship simply weakens civilian leadership...Also you can do something about a corrupt civilian government but can't do jack about a corrupt dictator...Just look at our neighbors...For major portion of the life span they had been under dictatorship...check how weak their civilian leadership is!!

Democracy might be slow however long lasting!!
 
.
i agree India needed dictatorship for 20 to 30 years after independence then all the problems of Kashmir or national insecurity would have been solved and may be we would have surpassed china in military and economic progress and more over our babus would have worked harder and effectively or else they would have lost their head,the scientists would have invented many inventions as they would had dead lines. but indias fate was in democracy limping and walking and jogging, india needs to sprint only then we will catchup china
 
.
But who will bell the cat...after 20 years who will right minded dictator willingly through up all his power...also i am dam sure, dictatorship will/was disintegrate India because, we are too diverse to be ruled by single person.
 
.
how will you remove the dictatorship after 20 years if somebody implement it today?
 
.
India needed 2-3 decades of dictatorship to make a strong military and economy policy to thrive in the long term. The democracy we got under the Neheruvian decades was lost pleasing every other foreign powers with our pants down, while fooling the ignorant masses in lieu of chicken and daaru, and the semi educated masses with grandiose schemes of socialism.

We should look at it with a neutral perspective . If Netaji was looking for two decades of dictatorship and slow democracy after that it would have been indeed good.
But who knows ?Because power corrupts any one even if he /her is cent percent good heart .Netaji is also not an exception.

But at the end Netaji was the beloved son of this motherland and Indians.
Shitty article like this wont change that .He will live in our hearts forever.
 
. .
It's not Nehrus choice of democracy that's bad, but Nehrus and his successors choice of a command economy that was the fault. The license raj was an absolute disaster.

And you want a dictator? Imagine if you had a dictator that rules by a command economy? Like the extreme example with n Korea?
 
.
In a speech the same year in Singapore, Bose spoke about India needing a ruthless dictator for 20 years after liberation. Then Singapore daily, Sunday Express (now defunct), printed his speech where he said, "So long as there is a third party, ie the British, these dissensions will not end. These will go on growing. They will disappear only when an iron dictator rules over India for 20 years. For a few years at least, after the end of British rule in India, there must be a dictatorship...No other constitution can flourish in this country and it is so to India's good that she shall be ruled by a dictator, to begin with ..."Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose (right) with Mahatma Gandhi in February 1938.

dictatorships have not worked in large countries
 
.
Netaji wanted 20 year dictatorship(it simply means "Fearless disciplined leader", not hitler. Modi is neither fearless, nor a leader, all his charishma was corporate finesse), because Netaji knew that lower-castes of india are ch*tiyas and they will f*ck india within 30 years and all upper-class talent will start migrating from India to USA and Europe(&help them become big patent holders, transfer all traditional artcraft+maths+knowledge to them).

His prediction was right, that's what happened. India is full of half-Talibani(see Ramdev's FATWA on Shalwar-kameez/a mughal dress code equivalent to burqa imposed during 12th century in north india), half-gay hindus today. A f*cked up nation.

To top this disaster, now we have Modi who is re-igniting, re-playing lower-caste card to remain in power, by putting salt in outdated "oppression" card. If there is any1 oppressed today in india, then it is upper-caste hindus.

I would love to see communication letters between Ambedkar and Netaji. By the way, Ambedkar would be ashamed of today's lower-castes of india if he had been alive today. He wasn't anti-Brahmin the way Leftist historians(on british payroll, just like William Darlymple funds many today) have projected him. Ambedkar had written in constitution - "Reservations are only for 20 years. Remove it after that". Congress and Modi both are continuing same 'reservation' cancer.

ISRO/DRDO/HAL are running on same Reservation policy. They would have done 3 times better if atleast defence sector was kept out of this low-caste sh1t. Even socialist economy of Soviet did much better than india in science, due to merit and danda system. Same for all other nations. China was behind india in science,R&D in 1950. Now, it is ahead. Reservations freezed indian institutions, China raced ahead.

Nehru made one more mistake - He sent MI5 into Tibet, to create uprisings. That's what started 1962 war. Nehru was just another pakistani type chichhora, he loved obeying British orders. In public, he was deceitful and always hid his intentions. He wonderfully f*cked up 2000 year old neighbour(China) who never attacked in history.

These two legends(Netaji & ambedkar) had far more intelligence, than Gandhi, Nehru, Modi type opportunist thugs.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom