Nehru 'original sinner', favoured China for UNSC seat, says Jaitley

[Tresbon]

NEW DELHI: Hitting back at the Congress, finance minister Arun Jaitley on Thursday said first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru was the "original sinner" who favoured China over India for permanent membership into the United Nation Security Council.

This comes within hours of Congress president Rahul Gandhi terming Prime Minister Narendra Modi + as "weak" and "scared" of Chinese President Xi Jinping after Beijing blocked a UN resolution to designate JeM chief Masood Azhar a global terrorist + .

"The original mistake, both on Kashmir and China, was committed by the same person," said Jaitley while quoting a letter written by Nehru to chief ministers on August 2, 1955.

Jaitley, who heads the publicity committee of the BJP for the ensuing general elections, has quoted a part of the letter.

"Pt. Nehru's infamous letter to Chief Ministers' dated August 2, 1955, states 'Informally, suggestions have been made by the United States that China should be taken into the United Nations but not in the Security Council, & that India should take her place in the Security Council.

Pt. Nehru’s infamous letter to Chief Ministers’ dated August 2, 1955 states “Informally, suggestions have been made… https://t.co/P0hpxSvcaL

— Arun Jaitley (@arunjaitley) 1552550896000

"..We cannot, of course, accept this as it means falling out with China and it would be very unfair for a great country like China not to be in the Security Council," he said in a series of tweets.
..We cannot, of course, accept this as it means falling out with China and it would be very unfair for a great coun… https://t.co/mZg6ZesrtT

— Arun Jaitley (@arunjaitley) 1552550897000

Taking a jibe at Rahul Gandhi, Jaitley asked, "Will the Congress President tell us who the original sinner was?"
India's bid to designate the chief of Pakistan-based terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed as a global terrorist suffered a setback with China putting a technical hold on a proposal to ban him following the Pulwama terror attack.
The proposal to designate Azhar under the 1267 Al-Qaeda Sanctions Committee of the UNSC was moved by France, the UK and the US on February 27, days after a suicide bomber of the JeM killed 44 CRPF soldiers in Jammu and Kashmir's Pulwama, leading to a flare-up in tensions between India and Pakistan.

 

[Kai Liu]

uring World War II the term "Big Four" referred to the alliance of the US, UK, USSR and China. At the Second Moscow Conference in October 1943, Chinese Ambassador in Moscow Foo Ping-sheung joined foreign ministers Anthony Eden (UK), Cordell Hull (US) and Vyacheslav Molotov (Soviet Union) in the Declaration of the Four Nations. China, however, was not a party at the conference, at the request of the Soviet Union, and did not take part in the other Moscow Declarations.[2][3]

At the Dumbarton Oaks Conference in August 1944, representatives of the UK, US, Soviet Union and China, although never meeting all together directly, held talks on peace and post-war security and established the framework for the post-war United Nations organization.[4] The conversations were held in two phases, since the Soviets were unwilling to meet directly with the Chinese.[5] In the first phase, representatives of the Soviet Union, the UK and the US convened between August 21 and September 28. In the second, representatives of Republic of China, the UK and the US held discussions between September 29 and October 7. The representatives were Edward R. Stettinius, US Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Andrei Gromyko, American Ambassador to the US, Sir Alexander Cadogan,France Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (replaced by Lord Halifax for the second phase) and Ku Wei-chün, Chinese Ambassador to the US.[6]

In the talks on the format of the future United Nations organisation, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed a post-war council, labelled the Four Policemen, expected to guarantee world peace, comprising China, Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. With the addition of France, this concept came to fruition as the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Four_Conference

 

[sinait]

India have CHARLATANS for ministers.
Some of Twitter comments are quite FUNNY.

Vikas Puri‏ @vikas_pur Mar 15
Replying to @arunjaitley
I think u graduated from What’s app university.
U don’t even know the charter of UN. No country has been included in security council since 1945 and India wasn't a republic in 1947.
U guys r running country but u & ur PM, law minister r so dumb.
God save India.

Raju P.Nair‏ @raju1986pnair Mar 14
Replying to @arunjaitley
1945 republic of China was founding member of UN, Nehru was still fighting for independence 1971
People Republic of China became UN memeber and part of Security council but Nehru died in 1964.
Stop taking WhatsApp forwards seriously
.

 

[GS Zhou]

Take a check on the Charter of the United Nations please.

CHAPTER V: THE SECURITY COUNCIL

Article 23
The Security Council shall consist of fifteen Members of the United Nations. The Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America shall be permanent members of the Security Council. The General Assembly shall elect ten other Members of the United Nations to be non-permanent members of the Security Council, due regard being specially paid, in the first instance to the contribution of Members of the United Nations to the maintenance of international peace and security and to the other purposes of the Organization, and also to equitable geographical distribution.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
By the time the UN Charter was signed (June 26th, 1945), India was NOT an independent state yet.

 

[Quibbler]

Internal politics. Don't waste too much time on it. This is not our international narrative. Let it come from a an official government source that you can complain.

It hard for you to understand as you have no domestic free media. You have to quack the line of CCP or you will not be able to travel, rent use internet or simply be jailed.

India has a free media and that has a downside of including the right to be speak nonsense. It is not difference of narrative but difference of opinions and beliefs within different segments. You have nitpicked a nonsensical piece of opinion but dont understand that this opinion has already been slandered by the same free media which you have failed to see (maybe stemming from your missing understanding of free media - not sure though).

Sayonara

 

[Kai Liu]

Internal politics. Don't waste too much time on it. This is not our international narrative. Let it come from a an official government source that you can complain.

It hard for you to understand as you have no domestic free media. You have to quack the line of CCP or you will not be able to travel, rent use internet or simply be jailed.

India has a free media and that has a downside of including the right to be speak nonsense. It is not difference of narrative but difference of opinions and beliefs within different segments. You have nitpicked a nonsensical piece of opinion but dont understand that this opinion has already been slandered by the same free media which you have failed to see (maybe stemming from your missing understanding of free media - not sure though).

Sayonara

Another B.S. told you by your "free media"....

 

[Quibbler]

Another B.S. told you by your "free media"....

Congrats you earned your 50 cents. Probably more since your post had even less logic that CCPs target.

 

[rott]

Waste of time on these fools.

 

[ChinaToday]

Shameless bragging to make themselves feel good f@cking useless country

 

[Kai Liu]

Shameless bragging to make themselves feel good f@cking useless country

The reason lies in that those indians always think india is on par with any major powers, but actually it is a piece of shit, from the past, to the present, or in the future....

 

[Sanchez]

When China sit in the chair of UNSC India then was called British India.

 

[JF-17ThunderBlock3]

Congrats you earned your 50 cents. Probably more since your post had even less logic that CCPs target.

1 Rupee People always concerned about Cents lol

 

[Han Patriot]

A beggars telling a millionaire he gave him permission to buy a house. Use some critical thinking, when China was fighting the war, India didn't even exist. The UN chair was inherited from ROC. Imaginative slumdogs.

 

[empirefighter]

-UN found in 1945， India founded in 1947. Are all the Indian people low IQ and cannot count the math?

India is really a country full of liars. Their history books must be very different from other world. The foundation of UN and the security cousil was less than 100years and clearly record. The India， an invented county， a loser civilization conquered by dozen of ouside invaders for thousand of year， dare to tell such kind of lies. I really understand why India is a loser for thousands of years， because they live in a parallel world unlike us.

 

[Sanchez]

-UN found in 1945， India founded in 1947. Are all the Indian people low IQ and cannot count the math?

India is really a country full of liars. Their history books must be very different from other world. The foundation of UN and the security cousil was less than 100years and clearly record. The India， an invented county， a loser civilization conquered by dozen of ouside invaders for thousand of year， dare to tell such kind of lies. I really understand why India is a loser for thousands of years， because they live in a parallel world unlike us.

They call it free speech!