I've read similar & I've read differently as well - I just don't think that the raison detre presented is anymore peculiar than the one presented by the assassins of others !
Take the example of Gandhi Sahib - He was killed by a Hindu Zealot because of being too soft on the Muslims !
Was he ? Not from where we stood & looked on ! But he certainly was from where he stood !
The point isn't what was said or what wasn't the point is that if these acts are to be taken to be acts of terrorism than everything that man has ever done when he has picked up arms even with the best of intentions is an act of terrorism !
Therefore I think we should stick with some of the more black-and-white definitions of it like when a bunch of Muslim Extremists rammed their planes into the World Trade Center or when a bunch of Christian zealot emptied his magazine into his own fellow Christians because of Islam's penetrative influence over Europe or some sh*t like that !
So @
Arabian Legend - Does @
al-Hasani 'thanking' my posts except the one in which I took a dig at Chemistry indicate that the Chemical Engineer in him flared up when I committed the blasphemy of implying that Chemistry is such a dull, dry & outright boring subject ?