What's new

Nations promoting terrorism must be isolated, PM Modi says in UK

.
A clear message sent. The world community must take action against Pakistan.

Convenience must not allow them to let Pakistan's terrorism supporting ways continue.
Clear as usual RAndi Rona of a murder terrorists who confessed his activities ...declared terrorists globally became a Nation PM bashing others big lol...
 
. .
The infamous Pakistani conspiracies and delusional theories :rofl:

Whatever do you mean we offered you F16s and you never asked for it. Do you know how stupid that sounds :lol: We are forcing you pay for additional F16s?

Your general has been coming to the U.S with an aid bowl in hand :lol:

U.S and its President once again called you supporters of terrorism, and you think we do that because we like you? :rofl:

U.S. Threatens to Withhold Pakistan Aid - WSJ
Yet the US gave aid anyway. You clearly don't understand how military sales work in your own country. military sales aren't just for money, the US uses them for political purposes as well.

No one from Pakistan is going to the US to ask for anything, Pakistan went to the US at the US's invitation.

If you're too ignorant to understand that, not my problem.
 
.
Bharatis haven't realized that the status quo has changed in the last 2-3 years, or they realize it but delude themselves into believing otherwise. The hot spots for terrorism are no longer FATA and Afghanistan but MENA. Other states are looking at ISIS as a top priority for origin of terrorist attacks. The terrorists in South Asia are now a distant second priority. The terrorist attacks in west in the last 2-3 years have all had their origins in MENA. This is probably the biggest reasons why bharatis dislike ISIS -- not for the head chopping that ISIS scum like doing -- but because it takes away all attention from Pakistan. "Whaa whaa, we can't use ISIS against Pakistan!!"

Bharatis are just crying to turn the attention back on Pakistan and no one gives a sh*t. Modi is doing the same, and again, not a sh*t was given.

Couple this with the fact that terrorist attacks in Pakistan are now 1/3 of what they they used to be, and you can see why bharatis are hurting and no one gives a sh*t about their call.
 
.
It cannot run a whole year without alms from World bank/IMF nowadays.

Pakistan will default in few years. It's economy cannot run. Actually Pakistan is hearing these barks since 1947.
 
.
Pakistan will default in few years. It's economy cannot run. Actually Pakistan is hearing these barks since 1947.

Clearly you have not been paying attention. So far, Pakistan is the top recipient of US Aid per capita. The same is for WB/IMF. That's what has been running it. Otherwise, is their any industry that you can speak of ?
But, IMF is going cold even on this. Recently it cleared it's latest batch of loan and asked for devaluation of Pakistani currency upto 20%. You know what that means ?

Good luck with your army trying to match India. Just to give you an idea, India's recent economic package for Kashmir only is nearly twice that of Pakistan's military budget and India's military budget only is more than the entire federal budget of Pakistan.
 
. .
^^ Yeah yeah. Doom and gloom. We get it.
Just replying to your friend there, who lacks the capability of taking part in a decent conversation without name calling.

At topic - After yesterday's terrorist attack in Paris, this agenda of isolation of nations promoting terrorism will gain tremendous momentum.
 
.
At topic - After yesterday's terrorist attack in Paris, this agenda of isolation of nations promoting terrorism will gain tremendous momentum.

But not the way bharatis are hoping. Read #65 to understand why.
 
.
But not the way bharatis are hoping. Read #65 to understand why.

You are entirely wrong about Indian intentions and interests. Pakistan without loose cannons is in fact beneficial for India.

So far as the attention on Pakistan is concerned, people are already likening this Paris case with that of Mumbai. Stay tuned.
 
.
This chai wala is obsessed with travelling around the world.
 
.
This chai wala is obsessed with travelling around the world.
Well, unlike your country's Prime Minister and his elaborate entourage, this chai wala works on bringing the investments in, rather than simply blowing country's tax money. That is what matters.
 
.
You are entirely wrong about Indian intentions and interests. Pakistan without loose cannons is in fact beneficial for India.

I don't agree with that. It is in bharati interests to have terrorist groups in FATA or other regions of Pakistan as bharat would be able to isolate Pakistan much more easily. As it stands currently, the terrorists are being reversed in Pakistan but they are gaining in MENA. So as the world's attention turns towards that regions, it pisses off most internet bharatis as they can't use these unfortunate incident against Pakistan like they used to 4-5 years ago. I still remember when the bharatis used to jump in and have a field day on all forums, trying to take the last inch of mileage against Pakistan that they could.

So far as the attention on Pakistan is concerned, people are already likening this Paris case with that of Mumbai.

And how does that bring Pakistan into the picture? Have they mentioned any Pakistani involvement or any Pakistani connection? Or are you try to imply connections that don't exist?
 
.
I don't agree with that. It is in bharati interests to have terrorist groups in FATA or other regions of Pakistan as bharat would be able to isolate Pakistan much more easily. As it stands currently, the terrorists are being reversed in Pakistan but they are gaining in MENA. So as the world's attention turns towards that regions, it pisses off most internet bharatis as they can't use these unfortunate incident against Pakistan like they used to 4-5 years ago. I still remember when the bharatis used to jump in and have a field day on all forums, trying to take the last inch of mileage against Pakistan that they could.

I will not go beating around the bush. You are free to draw your conclusions.

And how does that bring Pakistan into the picture? Have they mentioned any Pakistani involvement or any Pakistani connection? Or are you try to imply connections that don't exist?
Are you suggesting, what happened in Mumbai was justified ? That is a direct question.

It brings about the understanding that terrorism, in any form in any country is not a local problem any more, it is a global issue. So, irrespective of their country of origin, they are equally dangerous and threatening to humanity. So, all of them go on the blacklist. I believe the changes are apparent. Number of banned terrorist organizations that have origin/links in Pakistan tops the list. Is that what you had intended to become ? How do you defend something like that ?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom