Narendra Modi cannot lead India effectively: New York Times Editorial Board

[[Bregs]]

Narendra Modi, BJP's prime ministerial candidate, cannot hope to lead India effectively if he inspires "fear" and "antipathy" among many of its people, the New York Times has commented in an unusual move.

"Mr Modi has shown no ability to work with opposition parties or tolerate dissent," the Editorial Board of the New York Times said in a stinging editorial on the 63-year-old BJP leader.

The editorial said that Modi has already "alienated" BJP's political partners when Janata Dal (United), an important regional party broke off its 17-year alliance with the "party because it found Mr Modi unacceptable."

India was a country with multiple religions and "Mr Modi cannot hope to lead it effectively if he inspires fear and antipathy among many of its people," it said while recalling that nearly 1,000 people died in the 2002 riots in Gujarat.

The editorial, published Saturday, also questioned Modi's economic track record in Gujarat.

The "economic record in Gujarat is not entirely admirable, either," it said.

"Muslims in Gujarat, for instance, are much more likely to be poor than Muslims in India as a whole, even though the state has a lower poverty rate than the country," the editorial said.

"His rise to power is deeply troubling to many Indians, especially the country's 138 million Muslims and its many other minorities," said the 19-member Editorial Board, headed by India-born Andrew Rosenthal, the editorial page editor of The New York Times.


http://www.indianexpress.com/news/n...ndia-effectively-nyt-editorial-board/1187860/

 

[kaykay]

He can still lead India better than anybody available today.

 

[JanjaWeed]

lol.. now NYT will tell us who is right & who is not so right to lead us!

 

[GURU DUTT]

lol.. now NYT will tell us who is right & who is not so right to lead us!

think of it thios way sir the stooges of USA will onli hold the masters voice supreme ..... wo kehte hain na "head office ke to kuttte ko bhi samalm hota hai "

 

[Manvantaratruti]

LOL. Seriously ?

 

[Assault Rifle]

Remember Obama reads only NYT.

 

[Chronos]

I just read about the Bomb blasts in Patna. Condolences to the victims.

Anyone know more details

 

[Maler]

Atleast some sense starts prevailing in the west with respect to feku!!!!!!!!!

 

[Soumitra]

@[Bregs] did you bother to read the original article in NY Times.

I reproduce it here for your reading pleasure. I have highlighted some important points for you

Narendra Modi’s Rise in India
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: October 26, 2013

In 2002, rioters in the western Indian state of Gujarat savagely killed nearly 1,000 people, most of whom were part of the Muslim minority. Now, barely a decade later, Narendra Modi, who was the chief minister of Gujarat at the time and still holds the office, is aleading candidate to become prime minister of India.

Mr. Modi, a star of India’s main opposition party, the Bharatiya Janata Party, would become prime minister if the party won enough seats in parliamentary elections next summer with support from its political allies. His rise to power is deeply troubling to many Indians, especially the country’s 138 million Muslims and its many other minorities. They worry he would exacerbate sectarian tensions that have subsided somewhat in the last decade.

Supporters of Mr. Modi argue that an investigation commissioned by India’s Supreme Court cleared him of wrongdoing in the riots. And they insist that Mr. Modi, who is widely admired by middle-class Indians for making Gujarat one of India’s fastest-growing states, can revive the economy, which has been weakened by a decade of mismanagement by the coalition government headed by the Indian National Congress Party.

There is no question that the Congress Party has failed to capitalize on the economic growth of recent years to invest in infrastructure, education and public institutions like the judiciary. And instead of trying to revive itself with new ideas and leaders, it is likely to beled in the coming election by Rahul Gandhi, the inexperienced scion of the Nehru-Gandhi family.

But Mr. Modi’s strident Hindu nationalism has fueled public outrage. When Reuters asked him earlier this year if he regretted the killings in 2002, he said, if “someone else is driving a car and we’re sitting behind, even then if a puppy comes under the wheel, will it be painful or not? Of course it is.” That incendiary response created a political uproar and demands for an apology.

Mr. Modi has shown no ability to work with opposition parties or tolerate dissent. And he has already alienated political partners; this summer, an important regional party broke off its 17-year alliance with the B.J.P. because it found Mr. Modi unacceptable.

His economic record in Gujarat is not entirely admirable, either. Muslims in Gujarat, for instance, are much more likely to be poor than Muslims in India as a whole, even though the state has a lower poverty rate than the country.

India is a country with multiple religions, more than a dozen major languages and numerous ethnic groups and tribes. Mr. Modi cannot hope to lead it effectively if he inspires fear and antipathy among many of its people.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/27/opinion/sunday/narendra-modis-rise-in-india.html?_r=0

 

[joekrish]

@[Bregs] Mate, we got our freedom in 1947, did you forget that we Indians and only Indians have the right to Vote and chose our leaders and not some American paper.

 

[gslv]

he is much better than shehzada.

 

[dollarman]

I think at the end of the day, Indians will decide who sohuld be their PM, not Wall Street Journal.

 

[xuxu1457]

I didn't find any solid thing can support his view point, I think Modi is the least bad choice

 

[rockstarIN]

WELL. is there any other choices NYT can offer to the people of India?

 

[Chronos]

WELL. is there any other choices NYT can offer to the people of India?

Not really. They pretty mcuh pick on what the liberals in india parrott, pick words like Anti-Muslim and presto, they've got a story.