What's new

Muslims-only apartments coming up in Greater Noida

karim.chota

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
NOIDA: Apartments are usually targeted at particular income groups. But a developer in Greater Noida has narrowed down his focus group to a particular community.

The builder, Adarsh Group, is promoting the apartments - Gulistaan Golf View Heights - as "dream homes for elite Muslim brotherhood". The apartments - 368 in all, priced at between Rs 2,500 and Rs 3,750 per sq feet - are coming up on 3.5 acres in Sports City, Greater Noida. It will have a mosque, a madrassa, and will face Qibla - the direction a Muslim faces when offering prayers. Construction is likely to begin by the end of this month.

While this may be a sound business proposition, questions are being raised on whether this is an attempt at creating high-end ghettoes. But equally, some see this as a practical solution in a country where it is still often difficult for Muslims to rent or buy houses.

"These are going to be dream houses for Muslims in Sports City," said Saleem Zafar, owner and CEO of Adarsh Group. "We have been able to make it a reality after a long struggle. A lot of our emotions are invested in this because we wish to give the Muslims of India an opportunity to experience a best-in-class living experience. They should move out from their colonies and shift into plush apartments like this."

Despite the high sales pitch, not all Muslims find the idea exciting. "Being a Muslim myself, I don't want to live in an all-Muslim apartment complex," said Professor Shahid Jamal, head of the communications department at Shiv Nadar University. "Why should anyone prefer to live within a community of the same religion? Isn't that what ghettoes are all about?" he added.



Renowned political scientist Imtiaz Ahmed said the idea of India is rooted in inclusion and integration of all communities. "But such an apartment complex, dedicated exclusively to a particular community, makes them more vulnerable in case of violence and disturbance. Besides, it goes against the constitutional ethos of the country," he added.

But, Aftab Alam, a TV professional living in NCR for the past 14 years, feels there is logic behind this. "For Muslim families, listening to the azaan in the morning and evening is very significant. That's why most families try and live close to mosques. Also, celebrating festivals becomes difficult in mixed-community areas. Apart from this, it is not easy for a Muslim family to find a house in certain areas of Delhi as many landlords still have reservations about renting houses to Muslims, which forces them to rent houses in only Muslim-friendly areas of NCR."

"We are very clear that by building Muslim-only apartments, our intention is to provide the Muslims of NCR a high-quality living experience, which is friendly to their culture. People of different communities have different lifestyles and an apartment with a mosque and madrassa would definitely be a great experience for the Muslim families who can afford to buy these flats. This is just a step towards the development of the community," Zafar added.
 
Good idea. It will have a high quality living place with other religious needs.
 
The brilliant reaction from men like Shahid Jamal and Imtiaz Ahmad quite successfully denounces the entire idea behind this bigotry from the developer group.
 
Right to property ,which form basis of social contract, is more important than phoney Secularism.

These so called Muslim intellectuals could go **** themselves. Even rapist have a right to form exclusive housing society.
May be. But we never know if the intellectuals had emphasized more on right to property may be they would have faced much more harsher criticism for being communal.
 
Look at the justification by the builders,
this is just a step towards development of a community
They have their rats in th pant jumping when a ''hindu only'' community is being built in Kashmir.sickulars :sick:
 
I want to highlight this part of the article : "Isn't that what ghettoes are all about?"
 
Right to property ,which form basis of social contract, is more important than phoney Secularism.

These so called Muslim intellectuals could go **** themselves. Even rapist have a right to form exclusive housing society.

Right to property, irrespective of religion or caste, is the basis of our social contract.

If this is housing complex is indeed for muslims only, and hindus and jains and buddhists and sikhs are not allowed to purchase property or rent there, then the right of ownership of property of all those people is being denied.

Hence from your right to property argument too, such a proposition is problematic.

(And yes, muslims being denied housing in some places is also a violation of our social contract.)
 
I want to highlight this part of the article : "Isn't that what ghettoes are all about?"
Not at all ...
hF3D42D8B
 
Probably they may have. Brain dead media thinks that India won't be secular until every Hindu has a Muslim tenant, and Every Muslim is only Hindu neighbour. Retard do not understand that If i have a house, i could impose any condition to let/sell my property as long as that condition is not a crime.

Indians do have this sheep mentality of surrendering to state/mullah/baba. People should defend their personal rights.

1) Nobody thinks that there should be forceful integration or that every hindu should have a muslim tenant or so forth. You are creating imaginary strawmen and attacking them.

2) There is a difference between a personal choice of a home owner, and the business choice of a corporation. Corporations do not have the same "individual" rights as human beings do. If a business caters exclusively for one religion, that is undefendable from the POV of our social contract, which you so sanctimoniously brought up. Even in countries that hold individual rights in much more importance than Indians do, this distinction is made and enforced by law. In the USA, "whites only" business establishments which used to exist before the 60s are illegal now. Businesses cannot choose one particular race or religion to include or exclude. This is true even in the country where the term "social contract" was first used. (France.)
 
Probably they may have. Brain dead media thinks that India won't be secular until every Hindu has a Muslim tenant, and Every Muslim is only Hindu neighbour. Retard do not understand that If i have a house, i could impose any condition to let/sell my property as long as that condition is not a crime.

Indians do have this sheep mentality of surrendering to state/mullah/baba. People should defend their personal rights.
true.. but this is a business venture which is open to public.. not private property being rented/sold.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom