What's new

"Muslims have to fight misconceptions about Islam": India's Saudi envoy

Yet You Dare to Say - Pakistan was NOT Involved in 26/11 ?

Yes Pakistan was not involved. Pakistan means "GOP". If some non state actors do such thing that doesn't mean that GOP is involved. Indian Tamils were Helping srilankan Tamil Tigers. What does that mean. The GOI was helping them.

Kasab having being accepted and proved to be paksitani is not a "Non State Actor" !

No Indian is Found in Baluch Yet its Right to accept readilly that india is behind it, on contrary.
A Pakistani is Caught, Accepted by GoI to be Pakitani ,
Proved by Pakistani Channels ,
Accepted by Sharif , Malik yet " Yes Pakistan is Not Involved" .

Mate How Justified is It ?
 
.
Kasab having being accepted and proved to be paksitani is not a "Non State Actor" !

No Indian is Found in Baluch Yet its Right to accept readilly that india is behind it, on contrary.
A Pakistani is Caught, Accepted by GoI to be Pakitani ,
Proved by Pakistani Channels ,
Accepted by Sharif , Malik yet " Yes Pakistan is Not Involved" .

Mate How Justified is It ?
Look like you can't read. Pakistan means GOP. Government of Pakistan. Pakistani Sarkar. And yes no Indian found in Baluchistan because they are operating from Afghanistan.
 
. .
Yet You Dare to Say - Pakistan was NOT Involved in 26/11 ?

Yes Pakistan was not involved. Pakistan means "GOP". If some non state actors do such thing that doesn't mean that GOP is involved. Indian Tamils were Helping srilankan Tamil Tigers. What does that mean. The GOI was helping them.

With no intention to derail the thread I would like to put forth the following.

If GOI has the powers to influence all its citizens, if it has all the powers it needs to run the country & enshrined in its constitution, if it has all the means it needs in form of intel, Police etc to enforce its will there is no reason how it can absolve itself of its responsibility for the acts of omission or commission by its citizens. Neither can it hide behind a plea of ' non state ' actors.

A responsible govt is( should be ?) responsible for all acts that happen or emanate from its soil and by its citizens. To that end GOI has to be responsible for what Tamilians do or did in SL.

GOI has to be responsible for what they did or for not being able to prevent what they did. A stray one off case may happen - that too cannot go un acted upon.

The same I feel applies to GOP.

In the instant case, I agree with AZ in post # 18. The diplomat handled it very well.
 
.
This is where Saudi looses all its credibility and boasts of tremendous hypocracy. This coming from a minister representating a country where women are not even allowed to drive a car. How the hell they expects the same women to run a freaking business in the 21st century with her wings clipped. Just because Islam is good does not automatically makes X, Y & Z countries good too which incidently happen to follow certain brands of Islam. As the hypocratic minister himself points out, HUMANITY is the core and it is above everything else, it overides all other beliefs (including religion). Be a human first, then be Hindus, Muslims, Chritians, Jewis, Agnostics, Aethists or anything else.

HUMANITY FIRST!!!

LOL Dude house of saud has absolutly nothing to do with Islam there is no concept of Kings and queens in Islam.
 
.
When one say Pakistan did Mumbai attak, He is pointing fingers at the entire Pakistanis, What will an ordinarny man in Lahore or Karachi get by killing people of Mumbai. I remember last year when Some minister said "we doubt certain elements in Pakistan is involved in Mumbai attack", Our media purposefully changed "certain elements in Pakistan" to "Pakistan".

Another Incident, when a terrorist from kerala was killed by security forces in Kashmir, His family members even refused to see the body, this incident was never reported by any National news channel.

Journalism is now business, they will do everything possible to increase viewership
 
.
Kasab having being accepted and proved to be paksitani is not a "Non State Actor" !

No Indian is Found in Baluch Yet its Right to accept readilly that india is behind it, on contrary.
A Pakistani is Caught, Accepted by GoI to be Pakitani ,
Proved by Pakistani Channels ,
Accepted by Sharif , Malik yet " Yes Pakistan is Not Involved" .

Mate How Justified is It ?

New Delhi, Dec 2 (IANS) “Do what you like, but don’t get caught.” This was then prime minister Indira Gandhi’s laconic fiat authorizing the Border Security Force (BSF) to take on Pakistani troops several months before the India-Bangladesh war actually erupted on Dec 3, 1971 (MBI Munshi)
 
.
New Delhi, Dec 2 (IANS) “Do what you like, but don’t get caught.” This was then prime minister Indira Gandhi’s laconic fiat authorizing the Border Security Force (BSF) to take on Pakistani troops several months before the India-Bangladesh war actually erupted on Dec 3, 1971 (MBI Munshi)

Statements vs Statements but No Proofs.
Mate, I am Not a Blind Nationalist. I am Proud of my nation And Its a property that all Indians Possess, we accept whats Wrong - See we even Critisize Israel over Palestine, can u say a word against China ?

So I will Never Claim that India is NOT doing any wrong, coz it may doing so in order to protect its interests.

But - Every One Steals But The "Theif" is the One who is Actually Caught .


I have said before, The Day GoI like GoP admits that an Indian ( Like Kasab ) is involved in such activity - Indians will admit ur Claims.

Show proof, real proof, send it to US let Other share ur concern.. This is what we demand not just statements.
 
. .
So how is Islamic lands supposed to be ruled ?
Read the life pattern of Holy Prophet PBUH. JUSTICE ..JUSTICE..JUSTICE AND absolute JUSTICE...that's about it. Now its up to you how you define justice. For that you need to study the life pattern of Holy Prophet.
 
.
LOL Dude house of saud has absolutly nothing to do with Islam there is no concept of Kings and queens in Islam.


Would this imply that the muslims who ruled world over including the Mughals were un islamic ?
 
.
[/B]

Would this imply that the muslims who ruled world over including the Mughals were un islamic ?

those were not kingdoms....nowdays it isnt namely the Royals who are wahhabys --especially younger generation -- even King Abdullah himself.

but Royal Family is forced under pressure to appease the powerul wahhaby establishment. If they dont, then it can easily cause problems.

They keep everyone happy through their welfare system. Saudis get monthly allowance, free education free health etc. They have few expenses they have to pay from their own pocket. That is why 30% of them are unemployed, yet not homeless :whistle:

meanwhile, 30% of the oil revenues go to paying the 'salaries' (allowances) of the princes.



strange realities, but that's how it works in Mamlakat Arabeyya As-Saudeyya :)
 
.
those were not kingdoms....nowdays it isnt namely the Royals who are wahhabys --especially younger generation -- even King Abdullah himself.

but Royal Family is forced under pressure to appease the powerul wahhaby establishment. If they dont, then it can easily cause problems.

They keep everyone happy through their welfare system. Saudis get monthly allowance, free education free health etc. They have few expenses they have to pay from their own pocket. That is why 30% of them are unemployed, yet not homeless :whistle:

meanwhile, 30% of the oil revenues go to paying the 'salaries' (allowances) of the princes.



strange realities, but that's how it works in Mamlakat Arabeyya As-Saudeyya :)

Its the same story in the UAE, the locals get paid to get married and have children!

I wish India had loads of oil and gas, some people have it so easy.
 
.
why? they didnt work for it....

better to earn it honourably

but im nobody to judge. At least in UAE and Bahrain/Qatar they are trying to "diversify" the portfolio
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom