What's new

Muslim's Fetuses are not safe in India

Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
5,548
Reaction score
5
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
This video is wrong on so many levels.

1- A soldier/policewoman is using political slogans, and religious bigotory openly, without any consequences.

2- The Indians channels instead of showing outrage are playing this video as proofs of "courage" by the policewoman.

3- Indian's hatred for "their own population" is alarming, considering they say "Kashmir is their Atot Anag".

4- Indian Muslims should take head, your coming generations would be eliminated even before their births.

Now sing a song about India a "secular" country.
Fascist India at its worst.

 
.
This video is wrong on so many levels.

1- A soldier/policewoman is using political slogans, and religious bigotory openly, without any consequences.

2- The Indians channels instead of showing outrage are playing this video as proofs of "courage" by the policewoman.

3- Indian's hatred for "their own population" is alarming, considering they say "Kashmir is their Atot Anag".

4- Indian Muslims should take head, your coming generations would be eliminated even before their births.

Now sing a song about India a "secular" country.
Fascist India at its worst.

Sorry to say, Indian muslims both shia or sunni are acting as pawn in the hands of Hindus. Discuss it later ...BJP is playing sectarian cards and its working . Muslims of India are the most ignorant ...
 
.
And yet these Obsessed filthy Creatures Cry about Minorities in other countries & they try to act as if india is beacon of light in the Sub continent by Inviting minorities from regional countries to india so they cant convert them to Their Religion - it's time that Pak Govt start exposing these Hypocrites of which world isn't aware & tarnish their image just like what they do against Pakistan --- What kind of a hypocrite nation its...

its Time Pakistan's Foreign Office start Showing these Hidutva Nazis their True Face!!!

We already have enough Evidence that india isn't safe for minorities when Mass Murderers can easily Become PM (modi) twice & there is also no shortage of MPAs, MNAs who are involved in bombings killings of minorities & their Speeches against minorities Followed by Hindutva (RSS-Bjp) Controlled Media's Campaign of hatred against minorities.....

It can only happen in So Called SECULAR India & Incredible India....

India Should change this Fake SECULAR Word, also Its Fake Name INDIA - Make it Hindutva Republic of Hindustan.
 
Last edited:
. .
Sorry to say, Indian muslims both shia or sunni are acting as pawn in the hands of Hindus. Discuss it later ...BJP is playing sectarian cards and its working . Muslims of India are the most ignorant ...

Yeah they made their beds. Their docile nature is proof that they actually endorse these activities.

It gets said a lot but I'll repeat it:

If African-Americans and Indian Muslims were swapped, then even today that USA would still have slaves.
 
.
This video is wrong on so many levels.

1- A soldier/policewoman is using political slogans, and religious bigotory openly, without any consequences.

2- The Indians channels instead of showing outrage are playing this video as proofs of "courage" by the policewoman.

3- Indian's hatred for "their own population" is alarming, considering they say "Kashmir is their Atot Anag".

4- Indian Muslims should take head, your coming generations would be eliminated even before their births.

Now sing a song about India a "secular" country.
Fascist India at its worst.


So afzal means islam for pakistanis now ? can`t even condemn terrorists ? no wonder Pakistan is in fatf greylist now
 
.
So afzal means islam for pakistanis now ? can`t even condemn terrorists ? no wonder Pakistan is in fatf greylist now

Really!! If religion is no bound for the Indians, can you call Modi a terrorists and killer due to his hand in Gujrat riots and brutal killings of thousands of Muslims!!! And on that basis, call that the "Kokh" of the Indian mothers should be made barren because of Modi's or other Hindus violent actions.
I am sure you and the lady who delivered the speech is blind to the lynchings and killings of Muslims regularly in India. We never heard any such sentiments for those cowardly killers. Indians two faced terrorists.
 
.
Yeah they made their beds. Their docile nature is proof that they actually endorse these activities.

It gets said a lot but I'll repeat it:

If African-Americans and Indian Muslims were swapped, then even today that USA would still have slaves.
Blacks are much more politically active then Indian muslims....
 
.
So afzal means islam for pakistanis now ? can`t even condemn terrorists ? no wonder Pakistan is in fatf greylist now
Your Supreme Court, which is always under pressure from the extremist hindu nationalist party. Wrote in the decision, that court found no significant evidence which lead the court to order Afzal Guru dealth penalty. BUT WE HAVE DECIDED TO HANG HIM DUE TO PUBLIC PRESSURE ........... read the judgement please
 
. .
What is wrong with what she said?
Let's break it point by point

1 None of the Human rights defenders stand in favour of CRPF, Police and Army who face stone pelters. Nothing wrong in this statement

2 The so-called Human Rights defenders stand in favour of those who shout Anti-national slogans like Afzal hum sharminda hain. and Bharat tere tukde honge, inshaallah Nothing wrong in this statement

3 She challenges those who say "Tum ek Afzal maaroge har ghar se Afzal niklega" - basically more terrorists will be born. She says that the Indian Army, CRPF and Police will nip this problem in the bud and will not prevent any more Afzals (terrorists) to be born. She NEVER said anything about Muslims but only about Terrorists. Nothing wrong in this statement

4 She is understandably upset with the likes of Kanhaiyaa Kumar who supports Anti-National slogans. One slight thing she said wrong was to put the National Flag in Kanhaiyaa's chest. This is a person who needs to be punished for his support for anti-national activities but by sending him in jail for 20 years not death penalty because he has not done or planned any overt acts of terrorism - not yet atleast.

5 She is upset because Supreme Court opens at midnight to hear pleas of terrorists like Ajmal Kasab. This is because of the Human Rights lobby who considers Human Rights of Terrorists higher than the human rights of innocent civilians who are the victims of these terrorists. Nothing wrong in this statement.

Overall I feel the only people who will find this speech objectionable are those who do not consider likes of Ajmal Kasab and Afzal Guru as terrorists or those who believe that terrorists have human rights.
 
.
same as Hindu's are not safe in naya pakistan
 
.
What is wrong with what she said?
Let's break it point by point

1 None of the Human rights defenders stand in favour of CRPF, Police and Army who face stone pelters. Nothing wrong in this statement

2 The so-called Human Rights defenders stand in favour of those who shout Anti-national slogans like Afzal hum sharminda hain. and Bharat tere tukde honge, inshaallah Nothing wrong in this statement

3 She challenges those who say "Tum ek Afzal maaroge har ghar se Afzal niklega" - basically more terrorists will be born. She says that the Indian Army, CRPF and Police will nip this problem in the bud and will not prevent any more Afzals (terrorists) to be born. She NEVER said anything about Muslims but only about Terrorists. Nothing wrong in this statement

4 She is understandably upset with the likes of Kanhaiyaa Kumar who supports Anti-National slogans. One slight thing she said wrong was to put the National Flag in Kanhaiyaa's chest. This is a person who needs to be punished for his support for anti-national activities but by sending him in jail for 20 years not death penalty because he has not done or planned any overt acts of terrorism - not yet atleast.

5 She is upset because Supreme Court opens at midnight to hear pleas of terrorists like Ajmal Kasab. This is because of the Human Rights lobby who considers Human Rights of Terrorists higher than the human rights of innocent civilians who are the victims of these terrorists. Nothing wrong in this statement.

Overall I feel the only people who will find this speech objectionable are those who do not consider likes of Ajmal Kasab and Afzal Guru as terrorists or those who believe that terrorists have human rights.



Lacking on IQ or just too dumb?
1) why should any one care when the forces are occupants and the public rebels against them? As per your logic its wrong for Palestinian children to throw stones on Israelis as well, and for every population that is occupied and oppressed? But then again being a product of slave mentality, you won't understand.

2) Yes they do because then again, they are oppressed and under illegal occupation. They have every right to fight and blow up the occupation forces if they would.

The rest is too illogical and a repetition to even get into...

same as Hindu's are not safe in naya pakistan



It's funny how cunning you people can be.
There was a time you folk used to pedal, oh we are so secular, oh every one is an indian.
And today you bitches are happy if your own dirty hindu asses are safe and fine while every one else in ur country is feeling the heat.
 
.
Lacking on IQ or just too dumb?
1) why should any one care when the forces are occupants and the public rebels against them? As per your logic its wrong for Palestinian children to throw stones on Israelis as well, and for every population that is occupied and oppressed? But then again being a product of slave mentality, you won't understand.

2) Yes they do because then again, they are oppressed and under illegal occupation. They have every right to fight and blow up the occupation forces if they would.

The rest is too illogical and a repetition to even get into...
1) Palestinians pelting stones and firing rockets is as bad as Kashmiris pelting stones.

2) There is no illegal occupation
 
.
1) Palestinians pelting stones and firing rockets is as bad as Kashmiris pelting stones.

2) There is no illegal occupation


1) I feel sorry for you. I'm not sure if you are even worthy of that though.

2) Who will decide that? The occupant? Why don;t you go and try and tell it to the people there by standing by yourself on the street?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom