MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS-

[Major d1]

MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS AND TERRORISTS ARE NOT MUSLIMS."
In the HISTORY of the world, who has KILLED maximum l INNOCENT human beings
1) "Hitler"
Do you know who he was?
He was a Christian, but media will never call Christians terrorists.
2) "Joseph Stalin called as Uncle Joe".
He has killed 20 million human beings including 14.5 million were starved to death.
Was he a Muslim?
3) "Mao Tse Tsung (China)"
He has killed 14 to 20 million human beings.
Was he a Muslim?
4) "Benito Mussolini (Italy)"
He has killed 400 thousand human beings.
Was he a Muslim?
5) "Ashoka" In Kalinga Battle
He has killed 100 thousand human beings.
Was he a Muslim?
6) Embargo put by George Bush in Iraq,
1/2 million children
has been killed in Iraq alone!!! Imagine these people are never called terrorists by the media.
Why?
Today the majority of the non-muslims are afraid by hearing the words "JIHAD".
Jihad is an Arabic word which comes from root Arabic word "JAHADA" which means "TO STRIVE" or "TO STRUGGLE" against evil and for justice. It does not
mean killing innocents.
The difference is we stand against evil, not with evil".
You still think that ISLAM is the problem?
1. The First World War, 17 million dead
(caused by non-Muslim).
2. The Second World War, 50-55 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).
3. Nagasaki atomic bombs 200000 dead
(caused by non-Muslim).
4. The War in Vietnam, over 5 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).
5. The War in Bosnia/Kosovo, over 5,00,000 dead (caused by non-Muslim).
6. The War in Iraq (so far) 12,000,000 deaths
(caused by non-Muslim).
7. Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Burma etc (caused by non-Muslim).
8. In Cambodia 1975-1979, almost 3 million deaths (caused by non-Muslim).
"MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS
AND
TERRORISTS ARE NOT MUSLIMS."
Please remove first double standards on Killings.
Dear brothers and sisters this is not to prove that terrorism is done by non- muslims it is only to prove the innocents of muslims brothers and sisters.

It brings tears to my eyes while listening to this short explanation about TERRORISM...why the whole world are fully blind of whats happening in some Muslim countries?and why the whole world blame the religion of ISLAM if a group of people makes some terror attack...We MUSLIMS doesn't want to harm others,we also want peace like everyones praying for.

If Muslims are terrorist then why are most people converting to Islam these days.

 

[Mikaail]

And you think all this is going to change the way Muslims are perceived?

 

[JonAsad]

And you think all this is going to change the way Muslims are perceived?

Ofcourse not - Dog tail

 

[Cipherman]

I don't think Muslims as Terrorists.

 

[pak-marine]

MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS AND TERRORISTS ARE NOT MUSLIMS."
In the HISTORY of the world, who has KILLED maximum l INNOCENT human beings
1) "Hitler"
Do you know who he was?
He was a Christian, but media will never call Christians terrorists.
2) "Joseph Stalin called as Uncle Joe".
He has killed 20 million human beings including 14.5 million were starved to death.
Was he a Muslim?
3) "Mao Tse Tsung (China)"
He has killed 14 to 20 million human beings.
Was he a Muslim?
4) "Benito Mussolini (Italy)"
He has killed 400 thousand human beings.
Was he a Muslim?
5) "Ashoka" In Kalinga Battle
He has killed 100 thousand human beings.
Was he a Muslim?
6) Embargo put by George Bush in Iraq,
1/2 million children
has been killed in Iraq alone!!! Imagine these people are never called terrorists by the media.
Why?
Today the majority of the non-muslims are afraid by hearing the words "JIHAD".
Jihad is an Arabic word which comes from root Arabic word "JAHADA" which means "TO STRIVE" or "TO STRUGGLE" against evil and for justice. It does not
mean killing innocents.
The difference is we stand against evil, not with evil".
You still think that ISLAM is the problem?
1. The First World War, 17 million dead
(caused by non-Muslim).
2. The Second World War, 50-55 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).
3. Nagasaki atomic bombs 200000 dead
(caused by non-Muslim).
4. The War in Vietnam, over 5 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).
5. The War in Bosnia/Kosovo, over 5,00,000 dead (caused by non-Muslim).
6. The War in Iraq (so far) 12,000,000 deaths
(caused by non-Muslim).
7. Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Burma etc (caused by non-Muslim).
8. In Cambodia 1975-1979, almost 3 million deaths (caused by non-Muslim).
"MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS
AND
TERRORISTS ARE NOT MUSLIMS."
Please remove first double standards on Killings.
Dear brothers and sisters this is not to prove that terrorism is done by non- muslims it is only to prove the innocents of muslims brothers and sisters.

It brings tears to my eyes while listening to this short explanation about TERRORISM...why the whole world are fully blind of whats happening in some Muslim countries?and why the whole world blame the religion of ISLAM if a group of people makes some terror attack...We MUSLIMS doesn't want to harm others,we also want peace like everyones praying for.

If Muslims are terrorist then why are most people converting to Islam these days.

WW1 & WW2 christianity killed most whereas in 21st century dont know about the world however in pakistan muslims killed 80-90K muslims in the name of Jihad since the start of WOT therefore number is far less than what israel has done to palestanians in 60years .. bottom line it seems religion is the root of all evil

 

[Solomon2]

MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS AND TERRORISTS ARE NOT MUSLIMS."

Members here have explained to me that a Muslim who unjustly kills someone is no longer a Muslim - even if his community welcomes and celebrates him for his deed, Allah will consider him a kaffir. Thus they draw a difference between a Muslim and a "Muslim" - a linguistic sleight-of-hand whose purpose is to absolve both religion and community. Very convenient.

In the HISTORY of the world, who has KILLED maximum -

And there it is again. The writer wants to convince us that because others have killed - whether unjustly or not - in the past, terrorists nurtured and supported by the community and sent to slay innocents today should be excused.

...in pakistan muslims killed 80-90K muslims in the name of Jihad since the start of WOT therefore number is far less than what israel has done to palestanians in 60years .. bottom line it seems religion is the root of all evil

I don't think you know what you're talking about. The total number of Arabs killed in the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1948 is about 86,000 and most of these were not "Palestinians" but Arabs soldiers of surrounding states who died during the 1948-82 Arab-Israeli wars: link. So the true number of "Palestinian" Arabs killed in the Arab-Israeli conflict over the past seventy years is far less - perhaps under 15,000, with the majority of these occurring during the post-Oslo aggressions initiated by the "Palestinians" own leadership.

 

[pak-marine]

I don't think you know what you're talking about. The total number of Arabs killed in the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1948 is about 86,000 and most of these were not "Palestinians" but Arabs soldiers of surrounding states who died during the 1948-82 Arab-Israeli wars: link. So the true number of "Palestinian" Arabs killed in the Arab-Israeli conflict over the past seventy years is far less - perhaps under 15,000, with the majority of these occurring during the post-Oslo aggressions initiated by the "Palestinians" own leadership.

I dont think u Understood correctly what u are saying is precisely the point i was making

 

[Major d1]

Members here have explained to me that a Muslim who unjustly kills someone is no longer a Muslim - even if his community welcomes and celebrates him for his deed, Allah will consider him a kaffir. Thus they draw a difference between a Muslim and a "Muslim" - a linguistic sleight-of-hand whose purpose is to absolve both religion and community. Very convenient.

Every time an act of terror or shooting occurs, Muslims closely watch the news with extreme trepidation praying that the suspect is not Muslim. This is not because these terrorists are likely to be Muslim but rather because in the instances where they happen to be, we see amplified mass media coverage and extreme unjustified hatred towards Muslims.

According to FBI, 94% of terrorist attacks carried out in the United States from 1980 to 2016 have been by non-Muslims. This means that an American terrorist suspect is over nine times more likely to be a non-Muslim than a Muslim. According to this same report, there were more Jewish acts of terrorism in the United States than Islamic, yet when was the last time we heard about the threat of Jewish terrorism in the media? For the same exact reasons that we cannot blame the entire religion of Judaism or Christianity for the violent actions of those carrying out crimes under the names of these religions, we have absolutely no justifiable grounds to blame Muslims for terrorism.

 

[Solomon2]

Every time an act of terror or shooting occurs, Muslims closely watch the news with extreme trepidation praying that the suspect is not Muslim. This is not because these terrorists are likely to be Muslim but rather because in the instances where they happen to be, we see amplified mass media coverage and extreme unjustified hatred towards Muslims.

And your definition of justified hatred towards Muslims is....?

According to FBI, 94% of terrorist attacks carried out in the United States from 1980 to 2016 have been by non-Muslims.

Link to source required.

 

[coffee_cup]

Title is very silly, to be honest.

Why to mention something in the first place, which does not exist or is incorrect?

It becomes more like you are trying to unnecessarily put yourself on the backfoot....

 

[Post Colonnial]

@Major d1 - ofcourse all muslims are not terrorists. But unfortunately a lot of big and small terrorist acts happen and in most of these in recent times, muslims did it. So that we can distinguish between terrorist muslims and non-terrorist, we use the term 'radicalized muslims'.

 

[Grevion]

Musalmaan = Musalam+Iman.
A true muslim will never kill anyone.

 

[Major d1]

@Major d1 - ofcourse all muslims are not terrorists. But unfortunately a lot of big and small terrorist acts happen and in most of these in recent times, muslims did it. So that we can distinguish between terrorist muslims and non-terrorist, we use the term 'radicalized muslims'.

Every Muslim is a fundamentalist muslim. . We should not believe on media propaganda.

And your definition of justified hatred towards Muslims is....?

Link to source required.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omar-alnatour/muslims-are-not-terrorist_b_8718000.html

 

[Solomon2]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omar-alnatour/muslims-are-not-terrorist_b_8718000.html

The HuffPo writer makes the "94% from 1980-2016" claim, but link-sources to an FBI report that was written in 2005.

Statistics can lie, but in thus HuffPo puff piece the writer is lying about the statistics.

 

[Major d1]

The HuffPo writer makes the "94% from 1980-2016" claim, but link-sources to an FBI report that was written in 2005.

Statistics can lie, but in thus HuffPo puff piece the writer is lying about the statistics.

What about Iraq? Afghanistan and now Syria?

How many Innocent killed by USA?