Muslim Woman Denied Job Over Head Scarf Wins in Supreme Court

[Jf Thunder]

tipu sultan ruled from srirangapatna, not very far from bangalore, both in south india... tipu was the only transnational historic leader south asia had, and he would have been most saddened to see the reactionary thinking of many modern indian muslims.

ok, got it

 

[livingdead]

A&F can use this opportunity to bring out some kinky stuff surround that idea. some men in west fetisize hijab just like school girl dress or nurse dress.
The products are already available from others.
@gambit @jamahir

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

BTW the Supreme Court currently has 3 Jewish justices and they all voted for her.

 

[Thorough Pro]

that is not a headscarf... that is almost a burqa.
why does she want to spread unpleasantness??

why don't you send your nude sisters and daughters to spread some pleasantness?

technically she is right.. but what if workspace demands you to wear in certain way...

Before making such stupid comments, take a look at reality in your country

 

[DrawingDead]

It's kinda sad that a law that was meant to protect qualified people from being discriminated against has turned into this.

 

[Mabs]

that is not a headscarf... that is almost a burqa.

why does she want to spread unpleasantness??[/QUO

How would she be spreading unpleasantness?

technically she is right.. but what if workspace demands you to wear in certain way...

According to the law, any job requirement that you put out has to clearly show why it is needed and will aid in performing a task or a set of tasks. If the company can establish beyond reasonable doubt that the scarf will be a hindrance in performing her job responsibilities, the company has the right to ask her to take it off.

 

[livingdead]

According to the law, any job requirement that you put out has to clearly show why it is needed and will aid in performing a task or a set of tasks. If the company can establish beyond reasonable doubt that the scarf will be a hindrance in performing her job responsibilities, the company has the right to ask her to take it off.

thats why i said she is technically right... we are thinking very basic 'functional' way.. there is no reduction in performance due to clothing in many jobs, but they insists on suits and not hawaian shirt. I wonder why.

 

[jamahir]

A&F can use this opportunity to bring out some kinky stuff surround that idea. some men in west fetisize hijab just like school girl dress or nurse dress.
The products are already available from others.
@gambit @jamahir

why not?? after all, there are nun-outfit fantasists.

why don't you send your nude sisters and daughters to spread some pleasantness?

Before making such stupid comments, take a look at reality in your country

huzoor, your first line declares that you approve of the vids you posted.

i am well aware of what happens in india, or any other society... the only solution is socialism... always was, always will be.

How would she be spreading unpleasantness?

she comes to the place, with this long cloth dangling from her head, setting herself apart from the others, thinking of herself as superior because she wears bulky clothes and that long scarf... that will keep her from empathizing with the others and with humanity in general... this is not islam !!! this is what many indian muslims did since 1947, busy building mosques ( now number 300,000+ ) while many problems of india could have been easily resolved with their participation.

 

[RabzonKhan]

@Akheilos @gambit @hinduguy

Hey, I did a little research on the case and this is what I found:

Quite frankly, I did not know much about Abercrombie & Fitch and when I visited their website, my first reaction was, why a hijab wearing Muslim female would want to work for a company like that? But digging a little further, I found out that actually she had applied for Abercrombie Kids, which is part of Abercrombie & Fitch for stocking merchandise.

abercrombie kids | classic, preppy clothing for guys and girls

Therefore, the company’s sex appeal and the so-called “All-American image” was not going to be affected in this case.

I also found out that Abercrombie & Fitch has a history of discriminating against non-whites. In 2003 they lost a lawsuit known as Gonzalez et al. v. Abercrombie & Fitch and paid as a settlement almost $40 million to Latino, Asian and African-American plaintiffs. Abercrombie & Fitch also agreed to implement hiring and recruiting procedures to ensure compliance under the degree.

But clearly it seems they learned nothing from their previous blunders and continued with their discriminatory hiring practices.

The company it seems to me intentionally violated the law, since the law is very clear:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and requires employers to accommodate the sincerely held religious beliefs or practices of employees, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the business.

They could have easily accommodated Samantha Elauf and could have saved themselves from negative publicity and embarrassment.


Sources:
EEOC Agrees to Landmark Resolution of Discrimination Case Against Abercrombie & Fitch

Abercrombie & Fitch Sued For  Religious Discrimination

 

[Dubious]

@Akheilos @gambit @hinduguy

Hey, I did a little research on the case and this is what I found:

Quite frankly, I did not know much about Abercrombie & Fitch and when I visited their website, my first reaction was, why a hijab wearing Muslim female would want to work for a company like that? But digging a little further, I found out that actually she had applied for Abercrombie Kids, which is part of Abercrombie & Fitch for stocking merchandise.

abercrombie kids | classic, preppy clothing for guys and girls
View attachment 227110


Therefore, the company’s sex appeal and the so-called “All-American image” was not going to be affected in this case.

I also found out that Abercrombie & Fitch has a history of discriminating against non-whites. In 2003 they lost a lawsuit known as Gonzalez et al. v. Abercrombie & Fitch and paid as a settlement almost $40 million to Latino, Asian and African-American plaintiffs. Abercrombie & Fitch also agreed to implement hiring and recruiting procedures to ensure compliance under the degree.

But clearly it seems they learned nothing from their previous blunders and continued with their discriminatory hiring practices.

The company it seems to me intentionally violated the law, since the law is very clear:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and requires employers to accommodate the sincerely held religious beliefs or practices of employees, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the business.

They could have easily accommodated Samantha Elauf and could have saved themselves from negative publicity and embarrassment.


Sources:
EEOC Agrees to Landmark Resolution of Discrimination Case Against Abercrombie & Fitch

Abercrombie & Fitch Sued For Religious Discrimination

Great stuff

 

[Indus Falcon]

@Akheilos @gambit @hinduguy

Hey, I did a little research on the case and this is what I found:

Quite frankly, I did not know much about Abercrombie & Fitch and when I visited their website, my first reaction was, why a hijab wearing Muslim female would want to work for a company like that? But digging a little further, I found out that actually she had applied for Abercrombie Kids, which is part of Abercrombie & Fitch for stocking merchandise.

abercrombie kids | classic, preppy clothing for guys and girls
View attachment 227110


Therefore, the company’s sex appeal and the so-called “All-American image” was not going to be affected in this case.

I also found out that Abercrombie & Fitch has a history of discriminating against non-whites. In 2003 they lost a lawsuit known as Gonzalez et al. v. Abercrombie & Fitch and paid as a settlement almost $40 million to Latino, Asian and African-American plaintiffs. Abercrombie & Fitch also agreed to implement hiring and recruiting procedures to ensure compliance under the degree.

But clearly it seems they learned nothing from their previous blunders and continued with their discriminatory hiring practices.

The company it seems to me intentionally violated the law, since the law is very clear:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and requires employers to accommodate the sincerely held religious beliefs or practices of employees, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the business.

They could have easily accommodated Samantha Elauf and could have saved themselves from negative publicity and embarrassment.


Sources:
EEOC Agrees to Landmark Resolution of Discrimination Case Against Abercrombie & Fitch

Abercrombie & Fitch Sued For Religious Discrimination

Good work buddy!!!

 

[livingdead]

@Akheilos @gambit @hinduguy

Hey, I did a little research on the case and this is what I found:

Quite frankly, I did not know much about Abercrombie & Fitch and when I visited their website, my first reaction was, why a hijab wearing Muslim female would want to work for a company like that? But digging a little further, I found out that actually she had applied for Abercrombie Kids, which is part of Abercrombie & Fitch for stocking merchandise.

abercrombie kids | classic, preppy clothing for guys and girls
View attachment 227110


Therefore, the company’s sex appeal and the so-called “All-American image” was not going to be affected in this case.

I also found out that Abercrombie & Fitch has a history of discriminating against non-whites. In 2003 they lost a lawsuit known as Gonzalez et al. v. Abercrombie & Fitch and paid as a settlement almost $40 million to Latino, Asian and African-American plaintiffs. Abercrombie & Fitch also agreed to implement hiring and recruiting procedures to ensure compliance under the degree.

But clearly it seems they learned nothing from their previous blunders and continued with their discriminatory hiring practices.

The company it seems to me intentionally violated the law, since the law is very clear:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and requires employers to accommodate the sincerely held religious beliefs or practices of employees, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the business.

They could have easily accommodated Samantha Elauf and could have saved themselves from negative publicity and embarrassment.


Sources:
EEOC Agrees to Landmark Resolution of Discrimination Case Against Abercrombie & Fitch

Abercrombie & Fitch Sued For Religious Discrimination

thanks... that was quite a research.. you rock mate.

 

[RabzonKhan]

thanks... that was quite a research.. you rock mate.

Thank you for being gracious.