What's new

Mughals were Indo-Iranic not Turkic People

Understanding Genetics


finally one sensible post :)

The worst thing is trying to prove someone something which he/she don't want to believe. And talking about genes. Yes 90% Pakistanis are either descendant from Turk or Iran or Arab or any other middle east invaders who had settled in the north-western part of India centuries ago.

 
.
have some self respect and choose a name for your country so you can have an idnetity of your own and not your former british rulers
 
. .
sorry for weak English, English is not my First Language.

3)Jodha Bai, Mother of Jahangir is was 100% Rajput (Indic) Queen.
Mariam-uz-Zamani - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jahangir was "like" 60% INDIC, 30% Iranian and 10% Turkish Emperor of South Asia.

4) Mother of Shah Jahan was Again a Rajput Princess Rajkumari Shri Manavati Baiji Lall Sahiba
so, Shah Jahan was Indian-Iranian King not a Turkish king.

all i want to say is Stay in your Japan and Fake Turkish Nation, our kings have nothing common with your Bac


In patriarchal society, ancestry is patrilineal: your ancestry is based on your father bloodline, not mother. You take your fathers name, not mother. Mughals are of Turkic-Mongol bloodline.

There is no ethnicity called Indic or Indian. (Indian refers to nationality, not ethnicity) People of Indian subcontinent are of different ethnic groups.
 
Last edited:
. .
sorry for weak English, English is not my First Language.

Answer to Jap @Nihonjin1051 and Turk Member @atatwolf
The Glory of the Mughal Empire | Page 31




1)Zahir-ud-din Muhammad Babur
was an Uzbek Muslim who Founded Mughal Empire.
he was 100% Turkic
2)
but Mother of Humayun was a IRANIAN QUEEN Maham Begam
Maham Begum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so we can say that Humayun was atlast 60% Iranian and 40% Turkish.

3)
Mother of Akbar Hamida Banu Begam, 'Maryam Makani' was also an Iranian Queen and she was born in Sindh,South Asia.
Hamida Banu Begum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
so basically, Akbar was an Iranian-Turkish Male

3)Jodha Bai,
Mother of Jahangir is was 100% Rajput (Indic) Queen.
Mariam-uz-Zamani - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jahangir was "like" 60% INDIC, 30% Iranian and 10% Turkish Emperor of South Asia.

4) Mother of Shah Jahan was Again a Rajput Princess Rajkumari Shri Manavati Baiji Lall Sahiba
so, Shah Jahan was Indian-Iranian King not a Turkish king.


all i want to say is Stay in your Japan and Fake Turkish Nation, our kings have nothing common with your Bac
With all respect. You don't know anything about Turkic culture. If a Turkic guy takes a non-Turkic female, their children are 100% Turkic. We are the boss and we have the dominant culture.
 
.
Ask any arab, turk or central asian they all say you are a hindu from erstwhile hindustan.:hitwall:

well you also say that Pakistanis represent themsevles an Indian in the western countries. :hitwall: last group a Pakistani would identify themselves with
 
.
With all respect. You don't know anything about Turkic culture. If a Turkic guy takes a non-Turkic female, their children are 100% Turkic. We are the boss and we have the dominant culture.


Not really, Turkics have given up their original way of life for an Arabic religion and script, Persian language, culture, architecture, etc.

And the Mughals did have Turkic in them, obviously.

Mughal emperors genetically were Mongols/Turkic, Persian, Indian.

Family name they were Timurids, Turkics.
 
.

indo-iranics make 0 sense. Neither they were Indians and neither Iranians. Babur was proud of his mongol heritage.

why this thread bro?? it is well known facts... did anyone say otherwise(expect Pakistanis)?? if you start this page for an answer for pakistanis then my advice is..."don't take that fools serious" they clam themselves to be arabs(Arabs themselves rejects this) you must understand the feeling of pakistanis because they don't have an identify.. they don't have any legacy.. so they try to clam other hero as theirs..

Pakistanis don't claim anyone those things you guys repeat in every thread, but this doesn't mean we will suddenly start claiming to be fooking Bharatis. Have some self respect hindu.
 
. .
If a gene version is dominant, it will dominate whether it came from mom or dad.

So your chances of getting a dominant trait don't depend on which parent it came from.

The kids each have a 50% chance of having mom's brown eyes and a 50% chance of having dad's blue eyes.


Sooo which trait are we talking about and how do you know the mom was dominant everytime she was NON Moghul?

Doesnt say 60% anywhere else....try the vedic textbooks :pop:

Have you ever seen kids born from white and black parents? Always black dominates.
 
.
They were Timurids/Turkics, I dont even think they called themselves Mughals. Thats a European thing.

Babur hailed from Barlas tribe, mongol in origin but turkified. Now that I remember, we have some barlas in Pakistan as well. Maybe their decendents.
 
. . .
Mongloid and african black ancestry is hard to dilute even many generations down if you are talking about face.

True, that's why many bengalis and bngdshis look oriental. Those genes are stubborn as hell, take forever to wash them out, and they still show up tens of generations later.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom