What's new

Mexican Official: CIA 'Manages' Drug Trade

Hasbara Buster

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
-7
Mexican Official: CIA 'Manages' Drug Trade

Spokesman for Chihuahua state says US agencies don't want to end drug trade, a claim denied by other Mexican officials.

By Chris Arsenault

July 25, 2012 "Al Jazeera" - - Juarez, Mexico - The US Central Intelligence Agency and other international security forces "don't fight drug traffickers", a spokesman for the Chihuahua state government in northern Mexico has told Al Jazeera, instead "they try to manage the drug trade".

Allegations about official complicity in the drug business are nothing new when they come from activists, professors, campaigners or even former officials. However, an official spokesman for the authorities in one of Mexico's most violent states - one which directly borders Texas - going on the record with such accusations is unique.

"It's like pest control companies, they only control," Guillermo Terrazas Villanueva, the Chihuahua spokesman, told Al Jazeera last month at his office in Juarez. "If you finish off the pests, you are out of a job. If they finish the drug business, they finish their jobs."

A spokesman for the CIA in Washington wouldn't comment on the accusations directly, instead he referred Al Jazeera to an official website.

Accusations are 'baloney'

Villanueva is not a high ranking official and his views do not represent Mexico's foreign policy establishment. Other more senior officials in Chihuahua State, including the mayor of Juarez, dismissed the claims as "baloney".

"I think the CIA and DEA [US Drug Enforcement Agency] are on the same side as us in fighting drug gangs," Hector Murguia, the mayor of Juarez, told Al Jazeera during an interview inside his SUV. "We have excellent collaboration with the US."

Under the Merida Initiative, the US Congress has approved more than $1.4bn in drug war aid for Mexico, providing attack helicopters, weapons and training for police and judges.

More than 55,000 people have died in drug related violence in Mexico since December 2006. Privately, residents and officials across Mexico's political spectrum often blame the lethal cocktail of US drug consumption and the flow of high-powered weapons smuggled south of the border for causing much of the carnage.

Drug war 'illusions'

"The war on drugs is an illusion," Hugo Almada Mireles, professor at the Autonomous University of Juarez and author of several books, told Al Jazeera. "It's a reason to intervene in Latin America."

"The CIA wants to control the population; they don't want to stop arms trafficking to Mexico, look at [Operation] Fast and Furious,” he said, referencing a botched US exercise where automatic weapons were sold to criminals in the hope that security forces could trace where the guns ended up.


The Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms lost track of 1,700 guns as part of the operation, including an AK-47 used in 2010 the murder of Brian Terry, a Customs and Border Protection Agent.

Blaming the gringos for Mexico's problems has been a popular sport south of the Rio Grande ever since the Mexican-American war of the 1840s, when the US conquered most of present day California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico from its southern neighbour. But operations such as Fast and Furious show that reality can be stranger than fiction when it comes to the drug war and relations between the US and Mexico. If the case hadn't been proven, the idea that US agents were actively putting weapons into the hands of Mexican gangsters would sound absurd to many.

'Conspiracy theories'

"I think it's easy to become cynical about American and other countries' involvement in Latin America around drugs," Kevin Sabet, a former senior adviser to the White House on drug control policy, told Al Jazeera. "Statements [accusing the CIA of managing the drug trade] should be backed up with evidence… I don’t put much stake in it."

Villanueva's accusations "might be a way to get some attention to his region, which is understandable but not productive or grounded in reality", Sabet said. "We have sort of 'been there done that' with CIA conspiracy theories."

In 1996, the San Jose Mercury News published Dark Alliance, a series of investigative reports linking CIA missions in Nicaragua with the explosion of crack cocaine consumption in America's ghettos.

In order to fund Contra rebels fighting Nicaragua's socialist government, the CIA partnered with Colombian cartels to move drugs into Los Angeles, sending profits back to Central America, the series alleged.

"There is no question in my mind that people affiliated with, or on the payroll of, the CIA were involved in drug trafficking," US Senator John Kerry said at the time, in response to the series.

Other newspapers, including the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times, slammed Dark Alliance, and the editor of the Mercury News eventually wrote that the paper had over-stated some elements in the story and made mistakes in the journalistic process, but that he stood by many of the key conclusions.

Widespread rumours

"It's true, they want to control it," a mid-level official with the Secretariat Gobernacion in Juarez, Mexico's equivalent to the US Department of Homeland Security, told Al Jazeera of the CIA and DEA's policing of the drug trade. The officer, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said he knew the allegations to be correct, based on discussions he had with US officials working in Juarez.

Acceptance of these claims within some elements of Mexico's government and security services shows the difficulty in pursuing effective international action against the drug trade.

Jesús Zambada Niebla, a leading trafficker from the Sinaloa cartel currently awaiting trial in Chicago, has said he was working for the US Drug Enforcement Agency during his days as a trafficker, and was promised immunity from prosecution.

"Under that agreement, the Sinaloa Cartel under the leadership of [Jesus Zambada's] father, Ismael Zambada and 'Chapo' Guzmán were given carte blanche to continue to smuggle tonnes of illicit drugs... into... the United States, and were protected by the United States government from arrest and prosecution in return for providing information against rival cartels," Zambada's lawyers wrote as part of his defence. "Indeed, the Unites States government agents aided the leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel."

The Sinaloa cartel is Mexico's oldest and most powerful trafficking organisation, and some analysts believe security forces in the US and Mexico favour the group over its rivals.

Joaquin "El Chapo", the cartel's billionaire leader and one of the world's most wanted men, escaped from a Mexican prison in 2001 by sneaking into a laundry truck - likely with collaboration from guards - further stoking rumours that leading traffickers have complicit friends in high places.

"It would be easy for the Mexican army to capture El Chapo," Mireles said. "But this is not the objective." He thinks the authorities on both sides of the border are happy to have El Chapo on the loose, as his cartel is easier to manage and his drug money is recycled back into the broader economy. Other analysts consider this viewpoint a conspiracy theory and blame ineptitude and low level corruption for El Chapo's escape, rather than a broader plan from government agencies.

Political changes

After an election hit by reported irregularities, Enrique Pena Nieto from the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) is set to be sworn in as Mexico's president on December 1.

He wants to open a high-level dialogue with the US about the drug war, but has said legalisation of some drugs is not an option. Some hardliners in the US worry that Nieto will make a deal with some cartels, in order to reduce violence.

"I am hopeful that he will not return to the PRI party of the past which was corrupt and had a history of turning a blind eye to the drug cartels," said Michael McCaul, a Republican Congressman from Texas.

Regardless of what position a new administration takes in order to calm the violence and restore order, it is likely many Mexicans - including government officials such as Chihuahua spokesman Guillermo Villanueva - will believe outside forces want the drug trade to continue.

The widespread view linking the CIA to the drug trade - whether or not the allegations are true - speaks volumes about officials' mutual mistrust amid ongoing killings and the destruction of civic life in Mexico.

"We have good soldiers and policemen," Villanueva said. "But you won't resolve this problem with bullets. We need education and jobs."

Mexican Official: CIA 'Manages' Drug Trade
 
Why did the poppy cultivation in Afghanistan increased from merely 9000 hectors in 2000 to 192000 hectors in 2011...Only because of USA CIA support.. Its an easy earn and large sum of cash..:drag:
 
classic, why am i not surprised.

Keeps em poor and dependent. THe influx of poor latno keep the labour costs down.

hmm , plausible.

Not that im advocating for the authenticity of the article.
 
Why did the poppy cultivation in Afghanistan increased from merely 9000 hectors in 2000 to 192000 hectors in 2011...Only because of USA CIA support.. Its an easy earn and large sum of cash..:drag:

Thats a good question. The moment the invasion started the Taliban needed money. Its pretty much a fact.
 
CIA is not only funded by Federal budget, but by other means such as drug trade, blackmailing and looting... in Iraq alone it's rumored CIA had looted hundreds of tons of Gold.
 
Thats a good question. The moment the invasion started the Taliban needed money. Its pretty much a fact.
So you are saying that Taliban increased the poppy cultivation in the vast open fields while the US and NATO were sitting on chairs watching the whole movie?? The poppy cultivation increased many folds in the areas under control of US and Nato forces. Please do some research oldman.
 
^^ Oldman or other American/western right-wing nutjobs won't do research, because they are not searching for the truth. They don't care about right and wrong. Whatever their government says or does is 'right' for them.
 
How else do you think the CIA funds its black budget projects?
 
Wouldn't it be easier to just say, "America is responsible for all evil in the world"? It would save time and accomplish the same task for any country of not taking responsibility for their own governance. It's so much easier to just blame America. In this case, it allows Mexican officials who have grown fat and rich from the corruption of taking drug trafficer money, to blame the country that is trying to stop it. Nice trick, that.

Btw, when I was a kid the story was that the CIA was responsible for running drugs in south-east Asia...which absolutely no legitimate proof was ever found to support.
 
Why did the poppy cultivation in Afghanistan increased from merely 9000 hectors in 2000 to 192000 hectors in 2011...Only because of USA CIA support.. Its an easy earn and large sum of cash..:drag:

Well, where do you think the Taliban and their ilks get the money to fund their operations? Money falling from the skies?

War is expensive business.
 
^^ Oldman or other American/western right-wing nutjobs won't do research, because they are not searching for the truth. They don't care about right and wrong. Whatever their government says or does is 'right' for them.

how about this, poppy production soared because noone was enforcing its ban. And noone was enforcing it's ban as to not alienate the populace even further. After the invasion whole Afghan economy crumbled and people needed cash quickly, and in those parts opium ia the quickest way for farmers.
 
Thats a good question. The moment the invasion started the Taliban needed money. Its pretty much a fact.
So till 2011 the Taliban were freely cultivating poppy,i thought they had been defeated by then according to you guys! Don't you have control over the cultivated land or do you just live in the Green Zones?
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom