Bill Longley
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
- Messages
- 1,664
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Disputes amongst Muslims started immediately after the death of holy prophet (PBUH). The Ummah divided it self into two political parties, Shia and Sunnies.
Sunnies were those who dominated in whole history and were those who elected Huzrat Abo Baker (RATA) as successor of Prophet (PBUH) and thought that Prophet nominated no body his successor and it was up to Ummah to elect their leader.
Where as Shiane AhleBait (PBUT) where those who thought Huzrat Ali (AS) as successor of Prophet (PBUH). They gave the example of the event of Ghadeer-e-Khum where Prophet (PBUH) in clear words nominated Ali (AS) his Caliph. Sahaba like Huzrat Abo Zar Ghaffari, Salman Farsi, and Jabber bin Abdullah, Hajar Bin Addi, and Miqdad (RATA) etc were the prominent ShianeAli of the first period of Islam after the death of holy Prophet (PBUH).
It shall be very unrealistic to say that there was no friction amongst the Muslims in the era immediately after the death of Prophet (PBUH). In depth study of history will reveal that after the death of Prophet (PBUH) the friction started and hence two political parties with their own approaches about different challenges appeared.
But it is interesting to note that till the khilafat e Omer (RATA) every thing moved smoothly because of Justice and Tolerance amongst these political Fractions.
Era of Huzrat Omer (RATA) and to some extent era of Huzrat Usman was the last era of Tolerance in Ummah as they were the last rulers in Ahle Sunnah who recognised the place and importance of Ahle Bait. I dont want to get into history and events of past because they are open to every body to read and research.But after the Democratic Institution of Khalifat, monarchy started and things changed. in words of one historian
"the contemporary Islam which we see is actually the practices of Ummayieds and Abbasids not the actual islam which is yet to be discovered". with Start of Monarchy the era of non tolerance and violence started where islam was used to control masses as a tool and further sects were created intentionally.
I think that truth is relative and is based on perceptions and experiences for example for a Christian its a absolute reality that Christ is son of God and the philosophy about it is more convincing than any other denying it.Faith is always built on love. as Iqbal the Famous poet philosopher says "Love is mother of books where as knowledge is son of books" . love create realities as reality is what mind projects.There are many recorded incidents, which tell about certain experiences experienced by many Christians proving their perception of Christ being Son of God. In words of Sharief Al Razi, the famous Arab Poet
My Friend you cannot know the experience of wine unless you taste it
one can clearly understand that the truth is relative and depends upon experiences and observations along with self-understanding of phenomena playing as a catalyst.
Now keeping in mind the above example and historical facts we can understand that the sects in Islam were created as a result of perceptions on political as well as different akaidi and jurisprudential understandings coming out of same sources i.e. Quran and Sunnah.
Only Quran remained undisputed in Ummah because Allah promised its protection and un-like Bible it was not collection of books written by different people, as they perceived what Christ or other prophets of Israel said. However there are some disputes on interpretations again dispute are due to difference in political affiliations and akaids.
In case of hadith there are reservations about different hadiths among Muslims for example Sunnies deny or challenge those hadith coming from Shia sources and vice versa. There is also rift between fractions of Ale Sunnah. There are controversies on hadith among conflicting schools of thought of Akaied and jurisprudence like Wahabis and Beralvies and Deo Bandies and Ahle hadith.
If we muslims want to get respected we have to understand that the thing which I think true for my self may not be a truth for others and stop criticizing others and start looking on our selves only than we shall be able to make a tolerant society.
Secondly if we succeed in understanding the concept of Hadood [parameters ]and also the potential and concessions granted by Allah to legislate according to the requirements of time then only we will be able to over come difficulties and will be able to do what is desired from us to do.
How unfortunate it is that at present Muslim Ummah is producing only Muftees and no Mujtahids. And majority of us are still living in 7th century. Knowledge, which is the path to paradise, has become an alien in Muslim masses. Narrow mindedness, fanaticism and ignorance have become new version of Islam. I some time wonder how would Prophet respond to us so called Muslim and wonder what would have been prophets emotions about the present Ummah? For Ummah he wept and prayed for!
I think its time to wake up and learn from our blunders. Islam is not a still water; it gives huge space to change while remaining in the parameters or hadood Allah. Ummah must decide weather it wants to act as Allah and prophet wanted it to or remain divided and intolerant?
Ummah is passing through the most dangerous and challenging time of its history. It is facing multi facet challenges along with serious internal and external threats.
At one side there are centuries old Shia-Sunni rivalries on the other hand there are rivalries with in Shia and Sunni schools of thoughts. There is also damaging trend of Takleed (Following) and virtually every door has been closed for Ijtihad.
Ummah is divided into Shia, Sunnies and Arab, non-Arabs, Takledies and non-Takledies. In fact there is no concept of Ummah at present. Sub groups with in Ummah have destroyed the unity of Ummah.
At the external side, taking advantages of Muslim fundamentalism and disunity our enemies are exploiting us and at the same time humiliating us. At present Muslim Ummah is like a damsel raped and dishonoured by its own family members and from outsiders (encouraged by example of her relatives).
MUSLIMS OF TODAY AND SITUATION
At present population of Ummah is more than it ever was with resources that can make it one of the most powerful forces economically and physically but alas! Is it not the irony that with every mean available she is most impotent nation ever found in the history? Its recourses are being exploited by vultures who have made it their motto to drain even the last drop of its blood and who wants to take away every thing physically and spiritually it ever had or has.
Religion has become a prisoner in the hands of illiterate Mullah whose only aim is to implement his version on masses by terrorizing them that is why when masses have choice they reject mullahs the celebrations an streets of Kabul after the demise of Taliban by Americans and gang of willing, are the best examples how mullah served the purpose of anti Muslim Islam phobic forces.
Muslims them selves are overrunning the concepts of Human rights, women rights, tolerance and human respect, which Islam gave to the world. Stubbornness, ignorance and fanaticism have become a virtue. Hypocrisy is a trademark of present, so called pious Muslims, in fact Ummah is unsafe from its own religious and political leaders. Saddams, Osamas have become our heroes. Worst people on the earth are either our leaders or inspirations.
The civilization built on the values of material is draining spirituality of Ummat -e-wast. And Ummat-e- wast is acting like that person who was found of a sadistic pleasure in offering his own blood to vampires.
It time to think and reach a consensus about what we want. If we want disgrace and humiliation than we are on right path but if we want honor and respect than we should address core issues and mend our selves and break the chains of hatred, blind Takleed and non tolerance. Its difficult but not impossible we can do it if we want it.
Sunnies were those who dominated in whole history and were those who elected Huzrat Abo Baker (RATA) as successor of Prophet (PBUH) and thought that Prophet nominated no body his successor and it was up to Ummah to elect their leader.
Where as Shiane AhleBait (PBUT) where those who thought Huzrat Ali (AS) as successor of Prophet (PBUH). They gave the example of the event of Ghadeer-e-Khum where Prophet (PBUH) in clear words nominated Ali (AS) his Caliph. Sahaba like Huzrat Abo Zar Ghaffari, Salman Farsi, and Jabber bin Abdullah, Hajar Bin Addi, and Miqdad (RATA) etc were the prominent ShianeAli of the first period of Islam after the death of holy Prophet (PBUH).
It shall be very unrealistic to say that there was no friction amongst the Muslims in the era immediately after the death of Prophet (PBUH). In depth study of history will reveal that after the death of Prophet (PBUH) the friction started and hence two political parties with their own approaches about different challenges appeared.
But it is interesting to note that till the khilafat e Omer (RATA) every thing moved smoothly because of Justice and Tolerance amongst these political Fractions.
Era of Huzrat Omer (RATA) and to some extent era of Huzrat Usman was the last era of Tolerance in Ummah as they were the last rulers in Ahle Sunnah who recognised the place and importance of Ahle Bait. I dont want to get into history and events of past because they are open to every body to read and research.But after the Democratic Institution of Khalifat, monarchy started and things changed. in words of one historian
"the contemporary Islam which we see is actually the practices of Ummayieds and Abbasids not the actual islam which is yet to be discovered". with Start of Monarchy the era of non tolerance and violence started where islam was used to control masses as a tool and further sects were created intentionally.
I think that truth is relative and is based on perceptions and experiences for example for a Christian its a absolute reality that Christ is son of God and the philosophy about it is more convincing than any other denying it.Faith is always built on love. as Iqbal the Famous poet philosopher says "Love is mother of books where as knowledge is son of books" . love create realities as reality is what mind projects.There are many recorded incidents, which tell about certain experiences experienced by many Christians proving their perception of Christ being Son of God. In words of Sharief Al Razi, the famous Arab Poet
My Friend you cannot know the experience of wine unless you taste it
one can clearly understand that the truth is relative and depends upon experiences and observations along with self-understanding of phenomena playing as a catalyst.
Now keeping in mind the above example and historical facts we can understand that the sects in Islam were created as a result of perceptions on political as well as different akaidi and jurisprudential understandings coming out of same sources i.e. Quran and Sunnah.
Only Quran remained undisputed in Ummah because Allah promised its protection and un-like Bible it was not collection of books written by different people, as they perceived what Christ or other prophets of Israel said. However there are some disputes on interpretations again dispute are due to difference in political affiliations and akaids.
In case of hadith there are reservations about different hadiths among Muslims for example Sunnies deny or challenge those hadith coming from Shia sources and vice versa. There is also rift between fractions of Ale Sunnah. There are controversies on hadith among conflicting schools of thought of Akaied and jurisprudence like Wahabis and Beralvies and Deo Bandies and Ahle hadith.
If we muslims want to get respected we have to understand that the thing which I think true for my self may not be a truth for others and stop criticizing others and start looking on our selves only than we shall be able to make a tolerant society.
Secondly if we succeed in understanding the concept of Hadood [parameters ]and also the potential and concessions granted by Allah to legislate according to the requirements of time then only we will be able to over come difficulties and will be able to do what is desired from us to do.
How unfortunate it is that at present Muslim Ummah is producing only Muftees and no Mujtahids. And majority of us are still living in 7th century. Knowledge, which is the path to paradise, has become an alien in Muslim masses. Narrow mindedness, fanaticism and ignorance have become new version of Islam. I some time wonder how would Prophet respond to us so called Muslim and wonder what would have been prophets emotions about the present Ummah? For Ummah he wept and prayed for!
I think its time to wake up and learn from our blunders. Islam is not a still water; it gives huge space to change while remaining in the parameters or hadood Allah. Ummah must decide weather it wants to act as Allah and prophet wanted it to or remain divided and intolerant?
Ummah is passing through the most dangerous and challenging time of its history. It is facing multi facet challenges along with serious internal and external threats.
At one side there are centuries old Shia-Sunni rivalries on the other hand there are rivalries with in Shia and Sunni schools of thoughts. There is also damaging trend of Takleed (Following) and virtually every door has been closed for Ijtihad.
Ummah is divided into Shia, Sunnies and Arab, non-Arabs, Takledies and non-Takledies. In fact there is no concept of Ummah at present. Sub groups with in Ummah have destroyed the unity of Ummah.
At the external side, taking advantages of Muslim fundamentalism and disunity our enemies are exploiting us and at the same time humiliating us. At present Muslim Ummah is like a damsel raped and dishonoured by its own family members and from outsiders (encouraged by example of her relatives).
MUSLIMS OF TODAY AND SITUATION
At present population of Ummah is more than it ever was with resources that can make it one of the most powerful forces economically and physically but alas! Is it not the irony that with every mean available she is most impotent nation ever found in the history? Its recourses are being exploited by vultures who have made it their motto to drain even the last drop of its blood and who wants to take away every thing physically and spiritually it ever had or has.
Religion has become a prisoner in the hands of illiterate Mullah whose only aim is to implement his version on masses by terrorizing them that is why when masses have choice they reject mullahs the celebrations an streets of Kabul after the demise of Taliban by Americans and gang of willing, are the best examples how mullah served the purpose of anti Muslim Islam phobic forces.
Muslims them selves are overrunning the concepts of Human rights, women rights, tolerance and human respect, which Islam gave to the world. Stubbornness, ignorance and fanaticism have become a virtue. Hypocrisy is a trademark of present, so called pious Muslims, in fact Ummah is unsafe from its own religious and political leaders. Saddams, Osamas have become our heroes. Worst people on the earth are either our leaders or inspirations.
The civilization built on the values of material is draining spirituality of Ummat -e-wast. And Ummat-e- wast is acting like that person who was found of a sadistic pleasure in offering his own blood to vampires.
It time to think and reach a consensus about what we want. If we want disgrace and humiliation than we are on right path but if we want honor and respect than we should address core issues and mend our selves and break the chains of hatred, blind Takleed and non tolerance. Its difficult but not impossible we can do it if we want it.