What's new

Meet the indian Baloch

That individual's opinion is same as Shehbaz Sharif claiming that he developed entire Pakistan. Pakistanis didn't have that kind of mentality of involving in internal affairs of others back then. It was only learned and somewhat adopted after 1971.

LOL.

The ISI aren't included in 'Pakistanis'? It's all on record in a Pakistani general officer's book; not opinions, but what he saw and witnessed. Not a single opinion. And that was in 1966. One year earlier, multiple SSG companies were sent across into Indian Administered Kashmir. Pakistanis had an excess of that kind of mentality of interfering in other's internal affairs LONG before 1971.

Since Z. A. Khan isn't good enough for you, here's a Caucasian witness; now that should help you believe!


I'm enjoying this progressive taking you deeper and deeper into the doo-doo. Read on, MacDuff.
 
.
Free Nagaland and Assam - lol. Did they just throw darts at India's map and pick any state the dart landed on?
More people have died in the ongoing insurgency in Northeast India than WoT in Pakistan.

India has the most amount of separatist movements in the world.
 
.
And, as usual, an uninformed perspective.

My reference was to ISI interference in Mizoram, as recorded meticulously by your own general officer.

As i said. I don't care what happened in 62. I am talikng about today and in future
 
.
Our so called interference would only be limited to IOK. You won't see us day dreaming about regions that don't even share border with Pakistan like bharatis do regularly.We have no free manipur, free nagaland delusions like bharatis have for Baluchistan, Karachi, KPK, FATA and God knows what else.

So since you were talking about Pak interference in your affairs, I gave you our perspective.

Pakistanis don't care what happens in and around the Ganga swamps.
 
. .
More people have died in the ongoing insurgency in Northeast India than WoT in Pakistan.

India has the most amount of separatist movements in the world.
Sure - that explains the 80% turnout in the last general election. More than any other region.
 
. .
LOL.

The ISI aren't included in 'Pakistanis'? It's all on record in a Pakistani general officer's book; not opinions, but what he saw and witnessed. Not a single opinion. And that was in 1966. One year earlier, multiple SSG companies were sent across into Indian Administered Kashmir. Pakistanis had an excess of that kind of mentality of interfering in other's internal affairs LONG before 1971.

Since Z. A. Khan isn't good enough for you, here's a Caucasian witness; now that should help you believe!



I'm enjoying this progressive taking you deeper and deeper into the doo-doo. Read on, MacDuff.

Is it official book?

Kashmir is not your territory.
 
. . .
Go look for it. Hurry!!

If that makes you sleep comfortably.

I'm sleeping VERY comfortably, knowing that I have quoted authentic references, and that you were driven from one defensive posture to another, without knowing what to do about it. Incidentally, that confirmed my suspicion that you know little or nothing about events, and merely scream and shout and vent in other unfortunate ways with no foundation in fact.

That's fine then. I'm treating this file as closed.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom