What's new

Median Incomes and Middle Class in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Haq's Musings: Comparing Median Incomes of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan

Pakistan's per capita median income is $73.26 per month in terms of 2005 PPP (purchasing poverty parity) US dollars as of 2010. It is higher than India's $60.48 andBangladesh's $51.67 per capita per month, according to the World Bank.


Source: World Bank


Median income is the amount that divides the income distribution into two equal groups, half having income above that amount, and half having income below that amount. Mean income (average) is the amount obtained by dividing the total aggregate income of a country by the number of people in that country. A country's median income is a better indicator than the average income to gauge how a population is faring economically.

Median income also helps assess the size of the middle class in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh based on the definition used by Asian Development Bank and World Bank. Both of these institutions define middle class as those earning $2 or more per capita per day in terms of 2005 PPP US$.

Pakistan median income of $73.26 per month translates into $2.44 per day, higher than $2 per day income level used by ADB and WB to define middle class. It means that more than 50% of Pakistanis are in middle class. India's $60.48 per month puts 50% of Indians in middle class while Bangladesh's $51.67 means fewer than 50% of Bangladeshis are in middle class.


Source: Asian Development Bank 2010



A 2010 Asian Development Bank's report titled "Asia's Emerging Middle Class: Past,. Present, And Future" reported Pakistan's middle class size as 40.12% of the country's population as of 2005. It also estimated Bangladesh's middle class at 20.25% and India's at 25.05% of their total populations.


Source: Institute of Business Administration Karachi Pakistan


More recently, research conducted by Dr. Jawaid Abdul Ghani of Karachi School of Business and Leadership (KSBL) concluded that Pakistan's middle class rose to 55% of the country's population in 2010.

Even though Pakistan's GDP growth has been relatively low compared to India and Bangladesh in recent years, the country's middle class has continued to grow rapidly. It's explained as follows: It's not the overall GDP growth and average per capita income increases but the median per capita income growth that tells you how the GDP gains are shared among the population.

Data shows that economic gains in Pakistan are shared better than India and Bangladesh because of lower inequality. Income poverty rate (those below $1.25 per capita per day) in India is 33% and Bangladesh 43% versus 13% in Pakistan, according to WB data on povcalNet. Gini Index for India is 33, Pakistan 29 and Bangladesh 32, indicating that Pakistan has lower inequality.

Related Links:

Haq's Musings

Pakistan's Middle Class Estimated at 55% of Population

Comparing Bangladesh and Pakistan in 2012

India-Pakistan Comparison in 2014

Pakistan's Official GDP Figures Ignore Booming FMCG Sector

Musharraf Accelerated Human and Economic Development in Pakistan

Pakistan's Growing Middle Class
Pakistan's GDP Grossly Under-estimated; Shares Highly Undervalued
Fast Moving Consumer Goods Sector in Pakistan

3G-4G Roll-out in Pakistan
Pakistan Government Deploys Mobile Apps
Telecom and Media Boom in Pakistan
Mobile Money Revolution in Pakistan

Haq's Musings: Comparing Median Incomes of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan
 
Last edited:
. .
When did the Whole Pakistan urbanized.
 
.
By the way, this is also been talked many times in china, what's is tha standard of "Mindle class"??????
In China, some one think that the standard;
1. a 3 people small home income 10000~60000$
2. has house, >30m^2 per person
......................................................

but others think the standard should be higher and more complex, hard to fix a standard
 
Last edited:
. . .
Median Income.....WTF....I am sure that even 99.99 % of economist dont know economic term used by Riaz Haq.
Any guesses for next economic term??????????
 
.
@RiazHaq
You post all twisted data in your threads ..when asked for clarification you are silent ..whats %ge headcount here ?
 
. . .
Note to some members, if you have no analytical rebuttal to refute these stats and data sourced from the World Bank then don't troll and spam the thread. I understand for many of you this is an inconvenient truth but this doesn't give you the privilege to troll and spam threads.
 
.
Population below $2 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than $2.00 a day at 2005 international prices.

World Bank data on percent of population living on less than $2 a day per capita:

Bangladesh 2010 76.5%

India 2012 59.2%

Pakistan 2011 50.7%

Poverty headcount ratio at $2 a day (PPP) (% of population) | Data | Table
World bank data table are massively incomplete in this link.And for different country,different year is used for example bangladesh's was from 2010. You should show latest data only for example 2014,otherwise do not show.
 
.
The Median as a Better Measure of Development – and Better Than the World Bank’s Shared Prosperity
11/6/13Nancy Birdsall


In India, median consumption is $1.55 a day; that is associated with a $1.25 poverty rate of 33 percent.


Looking along the vertical axis at countries classified as low-income by the World Bank, median daily consumption per capita varies enormously: from $1.30 in Benin and Bangladesh to more than twice as much, i.e. at or close to $3 in Cameroon and Tajikistan.

Looking across the chart along the horizontal axis at about $1.50 daily median consumption per capita, the bubbles represent countries with a wide range of mean GNI or GNI per capita: Malawi, Ethiopia, and Guinea at less than $500; Pakistan, Senegal and Nigeria at about $1000; East Timor at almost $2,000 per capita; Swaziland at almost $3,000; and Angola at almost $4,000 (where the $1.25 poverty rate is 43 percent).

The Median as a Better Measure of Development – and Better Than the World Bank’s Shared Prosperity | Center For Global Development
 
.
Back
Top Bottom