What's new

Martyrs’ families demand restoration of military courts

Jf Thunder

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
9,194
Reaction score
-3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The families of martyrs on Wednesday urged the quarters concerned to restore the military courts to ensure speedy justice to the victims of terrorism as their abolition had further added to their pain.

The development comes days after a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court unanimously declared the trial of civilians in military courts as null and void and ordered that the 103 accused in cases relating to the violence on May 9 and 10, 2023 be tried under the ordinary criminal laws.

The court through the 4-1 majority also declared certain clauses of the Army Act as ultra vires the Constitution and of no legal effect. One judge of the bench, reserved his verdict on one para, though siding with the bench on the remaining paras.

Addressing a press conference at the National Press Club, the martyrs’ families appealed to the Supreme Court to review its decision against the military courts.

Nawabzada Jamal Raisani, Haji Sanaullah Khan, Rahimullah, Wazir Farman Elahi, Anwar Zeib, Fawzia, Muhammad Jamshed and others were among the heirs of martyrs, who addressed the presser.

Read more: SC rules against civilians’ court martial



They said that the military courts were all the more important to provide justice to the victims of terrorism and rioting as, otherwise, it might lead to higher terror incidents. It might also embolden enemy secret agencies to go for any misadventure like Kulbhushan Yadav, they added.

“The martyrs are the nation’s pride and the apex court is requested to have a thorough review of underlying factors in order to effectively curb anti-state activities and terror acts while delivering verdicts through military courts,” the families said.

They indicated that they would formally file a petition in this regard in the apex court on Monday.

The martyrs' heirs said that they had gathered at this point to demonstrate their unity to carry forward a movement for the restoration of military courts.

They said that they were just trying to uphold the sanctity of the martyrs’ blood and added that the military courts would surely take the elements involved in terrorist activities to task and give solace to their heirs.

The families stressed for quick disposal of Kulbhushan’s case at the International Court of Justice so that spy networks should be discouraged.

The families pointed out that the real issue was the lengthy and slow judicial process so they were demanding the military court trials of the culprits without further delay.

“It is our responsibility to stand against the anti-state elements. Those affected by terrorism deserve due respect and care. The children and families of martyrs stand united on the issue as their loved ones sacrificed their lives for the motherland,” they added.

The families said that it seemed that the menace of terrorism had one again surfaced in the country, as evident from the recent terror acts in the province of Balochistan and elsewhere.



 
. . .
a very bad tactic, to put moral pressure on the Supreme Court
I however, have full confidence, that the CJ will decide on the merits, rather than on press conferences.

Whichever Lt Col was tasked with this did a great job!

Well done sir.
how can you be sure that it was Lt Col?
 
.
how can you be sure that it was Lt Col?

That's the level usually deputed to handle these things.

If it's a Brigadier doing this, I would be shocked.

If it's a Major, I would be pleasantly surprised.

Point being though, this definitely does not seem organic.
 
.
Not to say ATC is the silver bullet to curb terror but their demand makes sense, if someone lost their son/ husband/ brother in an operation against a terrorist and he was let go by civilian courts due to "lack of evidence", (which has happened) its basically like pissing on their sacrifice. Dismantling ATCs is only going to cause an increase in extrajudicial measures by LEAs. Dismantling ATCs is not the answer, all stakeholders being pragmatic in utilising them is.
 
.
That's the level usually deputed to handle these things.

If it's a Brigadier doing this, I would be shocked.

If it's a Major, I would be pleasantly surprised.

Point being though, this definitely does not seem organic.
obviously

Not to say ATC is the silver bullet to curb terror but their demand makes sense, if someone lost their son/ husband/ brother in an operation against a terrorist and he was let go by civilian courts due to "lack of evidence", (which has happened) its basically like pissing on their sacrifice. Dismantling ATCs is only going to cause an increase in extrajudicial measures by LEAs. Dismantling ATCs is not the answer, all stakeholders being pragmatic in utilising them is.
ATCs are still operative, which is fine.

The Supreme Court has struck down the Military Courts for the May 9 riots.
 
. .
Not to say ATC is the silver bullet to curb terror but their demand makes sense, if someone lost their son/ husband/ brother in an operation against a terrorist and he was let go by civilian courts due to "lack of evidence", (which has happened) its basically like pissing on their sacrifice. Dismantling ATCs is only going to cause an increase in extrajudicial measures by LEAs. Dismantling ATCs is not the answer, all stakeholders being pragmatic in utilising them is.

The estab itself wrecked the whole process of military courts the day they started trying simple everyday civilians udner military courts for a protest.

The next of kin of the Shuhada (taking nothing away from their genuine grievances) should be asking Asim Munir these questions, not the SC.

Actually they should be asking these questions to whichever moron convinced/forced them to do this press conference.
 
.
The estab itself wrecked the whole process of military courts the day they started trying simple everyday civilians udner military courts for a protest.

The next of kin of the Shuhada (taking nothing away from their genuine grievances) should be asking Asim Munir these questions, not the SC.

Actually they should be asking these questions to whichever moron convinced/forced them to do this press conference.
do you honestly think they can do that?
heck, even the PM cannot do that !
 
.
1699493858590.png
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom