What's new

Malicious campaign against Pakistan Army

Leader

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
29,159
Reaction score
9
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Bwl6e5fCYAAruk0.jpg


page1.jpg
ePaper :: Pakistan Observer

A War Between Pakistan’s Police and Army: Sharif Family’s Latest Reckless Politics

10686671_10152248143556316_6578229989988412948_n.jpg


Pakistanis have seen a rapid downfall in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s powers in less than two weeks.



His dramatic downfall is the result of political blunders in fifteen months in power.



But instead of resolving the political crisis and uniting the country, the embattled prime minister and the Sharif family are spending money on the media and some journalists and politicians to mount one of the most organized, reckless and dangerous attacks on the nation’s armed forces.



The plan is so heinous that it includes turning Pakistanis against their own military through a daily dose of disinformation, and pitching Pakistan’s Police and the Military against each other.



In doing all this, the premier and the Sharifs are playing a political game unheard of and unknown in Pakistani political history.



There is a reason why Nawaz Sharif is described as the most humiliated prime minister in Pakistan’s history, or why one western news wire service described him as the new Deputy Commissioner of Islamabad in terms of his reduced power and influence. [See Nawaz Sharif: The New Karzai of Islamabad]



This is a prime minister who failed to unite Pakistanis after the May 2013 elections. So arrogant was the new prime minister that for nearly a year he would not shake hands with many elected representatives that he disliked. He did not attend a single session of the Senate of Pakistan. He rarely attended Parliament sessions. He failed to rise above old political rivalries that date back a decade, and allowed those hatreds to come in the way of his job to unite Pakistanis. He allowed a simple case of possible election fraud in four constituencies to snowball into a major anti-Nawaz political movement. And while this crisis was developing, Sharif missed numerous opportunities to nip it in the bud. On 17 June, he and his younger brother ordered the police to open fire on unarmed anti-Nawaz Pakistanis in Lahore. Fourteen were killed, nearly a hundred injured. One of the killed was a young pregnant mother. On the night of Aug. 31 and Sept. 1, he turned Islamabad into a war zone and unleashed the most tear-gas shelling in Pakistan’s history on unarmed peaceful protesters who demanded his resignation. Three were killed and nearly 700 were injured. In dealing with this crisis, Sharif created the biggest security scare Pakistanis have seen in peacetime, sealed one of the five provinces that make up the country, and seized all commercial cargo containers to block streets in Punjab and the federal capital, and generally mishandled a normal political event. Not the most innovative solution to a political issue.



On Aug. 29, the prime minister stood on the Parliament floor and lied to the nation about who asked the army to broker a solution to the crisis. [He did.]



In committing all of these blunders, Nawaz Sharif failed to demonstrate wisdom and experience that should have come handy to a third-time elected premier, the first in Pakistan and one of the few in world democracies.



Even now, in 19 days of the anti-Nawaz sit-in in Islamabad, Sharif has failed to act magnanimously to solve what primarily is a political issue, not a security issue.



Instead, his family, party and some journalists and politicians allied to him through incentives, have launched a ferocious anti-military campaign to divert attention from his political failures.



The campaign, in the media, parliament and on social media, seeks to portray Sharif as a victim of a military-induced conspiracy, or ‘script’, where the anti-Nawaz movement is supposedly military’s creation.



The purpose of this campaign is to turn the debate away from his political failures and blame someone else.



The truth, however, is bitter. Since 2008, Pakistan’s military has emerged as the strongest supporter of democracy in the country, and ignored numerous opportunities to intervene in favor of strengthening the government.



Whose ‘script’ was it to fail in uniting the nation after elections, arrogantly refuse to solve a political issue before it snowballs, order the murder of 14 Pakistanis in Lahore, and three in Islamabad and injure a total of 1,000 Pakistanis in both cities?



Now Nawaz Sharif’s cronies in media and politics are creating misunderstandings between the country’s Police and the Military, like Achakzai did in parliament yesterday. There can hardly be a worse example than this of dangerous political recklessness.



Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif should own up his political blunders, recognize his failures that led to a crisis and led his opponents to come out to streets, stop shifting the blame on to the military.



As his old comrade Javed Hashmi said in the parliament, thirty-one years at the top of politics is a long time. It is time Nawaz Sharif gracefully resigned to spare Pakistan further agony.



Mr. Quraishi is a senior fellow at Project for Pakistan in 21st Century, a journalist and a human rights activist. Follow him @AQpk

A War Between Pakistan’s Police and Army: Sharif Family’s Latest Reckless Politics
 
.
But thats what the democracy is about?
numbers are needed in the parliment to sell the whole country & its nucks because its the decision of the elected ones !
whats the problem in it every politician & even the ARMY stands with this croupt democracy why to cry then!
 
. .
oh please, you have to use force sometime, the model town was just an example, after that PTI and PAT turned Islamabad into a war Zone, attacked PTV, attacked an SSP, and our police is hesitating in even using tear gas?
Sure this govt has all the mandate to kill all the protesters or all of its political opposition !
thats called democracy in pakistan?
 
. .
It's the almight messiah who dragged the army in on the advice of general Pasha. I don't believe General Raheel had any foul play.
 
.
Actually, initially i was under impression that army was backing the whole drama. Until i saw General Raheel and Nawaz meeting, which bring another PoV for whole this episode (this was my point from day one but umpire finger, technocrate goverbmnet made me change my thoughts).

My take starts from very basic alligation of JI that IK was isreael asset. When operation happen in karachi. And then FATA region, the proxy of west got destablized in Pakistan. And peace overall started to grow. This made impact on the financial aspects of the country.

Pakistan started to move out USA nexus into China. And china was ready to invest good enough amount in Pakistan to make its alley even More steong. The puppet master who were using TTP started to look into option TuQ was simplest.option. with time they executed the plan through.some of his establushment. And civil stooge, Raheel isn't one.. and plan A was executed to bring.down democratic government and bring up Marshall which would help to bring more measery to the country.

That was the reason, Nawaz disnt force army to proceed with this, also Raheel conrinue to stay away from this whole drama, even after inviting so many times.
 
.
@Fracker i am going off topic and i understand that , but could you please tell me why would Israel Care who you& I(Pakistani) have as a prime minister.

Last checked Pasha Is working for UAE government and is advising IK question you should be asking why is he in pakistan and what does he wants.
 
.
@Fracker i am going off topic and i understand that , but could you please tell me why would Israel Care who you& I(Pakistani) have as a prime minister.

Last checked Pasha Is working for UAE government and is advising IK question you should be asking why is he in pakistan and what does he wants.

By Israel, i mean USA nexus. Check todays USA newspapers you will know they are way too much interested in who should run the country.

And UAE intelligence is very much dependent upon USA Toppling government, bring down economy, make it unsafe for other countries to invest..

I am still working on all the links, searching for saleem saffi articale on 12 Aug, which mainly in sync with my theory.

Edit: Its completely on topic
 
. .
Govt tried to create direct confrontation between protesters of Islamabad and Army, not once but twice.

First, till 29th Aug, there was heavy police deployment inside Parliament house along with few hundred army personnel. But at the night of 29th Aug, on orders of Ch. Nisar, all the police men were withdrawn from Parliament house and were dispatched to protect PM House. They left few hundred army men alone to guard Parliament House building, leaving them completely at the mercy of thousands of protesters; army men were heavily out numbered. As expected, the clash nearly took place at 31 Aug, when protesters stormed into Parliament House premisses and tried to enter the building where Army men were taking positions. Army men could have easily opened fire at advancing protesters since they were under attacked and massively outnumbered. But instead, army men warned the protesters at loud speaker to respect the army and stop their charge towards the building since Army is deployed to protect it and they will do anything to make sure its protected. The protesters luckily listened to army's call and stopped right there. A serious confrontation between army and protesters was avoided narrowly.

Second, Police was again heavily deployed to protect Pak Secretariat areas from protesters, there were several conflicts already taken place between police and protesters at the entrance of Pak Secretariat. But two days ago, all of a sudden, entire police force was found missing from the scene when protesters woke up in morning. The Pak Secretariat entrance was left alone for protesters to enter and march forward. They entered and stormed unguarded PTV building with no resistance from police. Few minutes later, army was sent to clear the building (instead of police) on govt's orders. Again a try to create confrontation between army and protesters. And again the army asked them to leave the building peacefully and protesters did that.


Conclusion: What kind of democratic govt is this, who is desperately trying its level best to create a confrontation between civilian protesters and armed forces again and again?

Other important questions are:

- Govt has imposed article 245 in Islamabad, which means Army is responsible for the security of the capital city and its key buildings. Then why the police force is there in the first place?

- If govt decided to use police instead of army, then why they use army instead of police when situation gets out of hand?
 
.
By Israel, i mean USA nexus. Check todays USA newspapers you will know they are way too much interested in who should run the country.

And UAE intelligence is very much dependent upon USA Toppling government, bring down economy, make it unsafe for other countries to invest..

I am still working on all the links, searching for saleem saffi articale on 12 Aug, which mainly in sync with my theory.

You dont have to post the links, your biggest trading partner is United states and western countries. All they have to do is stop buying from you and your economy will fall a apart.
 
.
oh please, you have to use force sometime, the model town was just an example, after that PTI and PAT turned Islamabad into a war Zone, attacked PTV, attacked an SSP, and our police is hesitating in even using tear gas?

There is a thing called water cannon and loudspeakers as army used during PTV incident, they are used against rioters first you just don't start live bullets and thousands of shells.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom