What's new

Major DNA ancestry database now correctly lists Pakistanis as Central Asian

indus valley people acquired central asian dna during turko mangol invasion
Actually inaccurate, the "Turkic/Mongolian" genetic contribution is less than 2-3% to Pakistanis, but spikes in Burushos and Hazaras, though their numbers are not that great to affect the average.

Secondly, this genetic component would be categorized under 'East Asian', not 'Central Asian'. This is highlighted in this data graph.
upload_2019-10-24_13-6-34.png


Our two main components are from Iranian Neolithic Farmers (IVC) and Indo-European migrants (Aryans). This is also similarly shared with NW and High-caste Indians though they have significantly less Indo-European admixture.

When comparing Iron-age samples of the Indus Region (Vedic Age), we can see that genetically not much has changed except for a shift towards Central Asian/Steppe which can be explained by the Scythian/Kushan/Bactrian migrations that occurred.

unknown.png
 
. . . .
indus valley people acquired central asian dna during turko mangol invasion
actually it was much earlier Sonny


the the original Aryan migration

most north Indians have y chromosome with central Asian genetic makers
distinct from South Indians

multiple international researches have proven this which included Indian scientists :)
 
. . .
actually it was much earlier Sonny


the the original Aryan migration

most north Indians have y chromosome with central Asian genetic makers
distinct from South Indians

multiple international researches have proven this which included Indian scientists :)
Nah. Even beharis are north indians, only punjabis, some rajisthani and kashmiris are similar to Pakistanis not others.
 
Last edited:
.
N

Nah. Even beharis are north indians, only punjabis, some rajisthani and kashmiris are similar to Pakistanis not others.

according to yr rss chutya bhakts bs

the geneticists don't condone yr misbelieves my child ;)
 
.
Last edited:
. .
People of North Sentinel Island Andaman are pure race.
Read again what I said...
"U would be HARD PRESSED to find a "pure" race without any mixing". This means that while it's not impossible...the exceptions are few. Those include any uncontacted tribes(whether on Andaman island or deep in the Amazon region).
 
.
Nah. Even beharis are north indians, only punjabis, some rajisthani and kashmiris are similar to Pakistanis not others.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3769933/#!po=0.303030
this research paper is written by Indian scientist published in international journal read and reduce yr ignorance Sonny
here's the abstract
Most Indian groups descend from a mixture of two genetically divergent populations: Ancestral North Indians (ANI) related to Central Asians, Middle Easterners, Caucasians, and Europeans; and Ancestral South Indians (ASI) not closely related to groups outside the subcontinent. The date of mixture is unknown but has implications for understanding Indian history. We report genome-wide data from 73 groups from the Indian subcontinent
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom