it was so effective that they used fake photo from last year when Taliban was fighting opposition groups as evidence . clearly shows who is not strong with truth.
No high ranking government or military official misrepresented any photograph. Only Taleban propagandists and local reformist / moderate traitors echoing the lie believe Iranian forces are incapable of effective counter-fire.
...which you are ignorant of.
yeah , we have quran , if they are in accordance with it there is no need of them and if they are against it , they are lies and must be destroyed .
Thoroughly incomprehensible elucubrations.
you claim USA was the last one that attacked Iran and i showed your statement was not based on any fact, their language have no role here
I was addressing the following absurd claim: "last time that some one attacked Iran they spoke Arabic" (exact quote). This is untrue and I demonstrated it.
Of course you deliberately ignored the falsehood as well as the fact that your oppositionist associate chose to focus on the language practiced by the aggressor, because anti-Arab racialism plays into the zionist agenda you serve.
My response was totally factual. At least the three latest armed attacks on Islamic Iran have been carried out by separatist and/or sectarianist CIA-proxies along Iran's western and southeastern borders. So you "showed" strictly nothing of the sort, all you did was to underscore how little clue you have.
Arabs is a group , let put Zionists instead of Israel to satisfy you
Arabs are a people. My statement clearly mentioned people and nothing else. Regimes are a completely different matter.
and when i'm at hospital i'm not at my computer and interesting thing about my specialty is when i 'm not at hospital my time belong to me and i can spend it as i like and sadly for you unlike other specialty there are laws which dictate how much i can stay in hospital and if i stay more than that its against the law and more importantly there are wonderful devices called cell phone we use them both for work and when we have spare time for other things
Spare us those fairy tales.
actually that plebiscite was like it
do you want islamic republic ? yes/No
and was held 46 year ago , two generation changed since then so if at the time you conclude that 98% Iranian actually wanted islamic republic there is no reason the percentage have not changed in last 46 year .
No government on earth will hold periodic referenda about the very existence of its underlying political order.
by the way as a matter of fact my father says he voted more than once in that plebiscite without having his birth certificate with him
Wouldn't have changed anything if it were otherwise.
Also, this goes to highlight the confidence Revolutionaries had in the outcome of the vote. Otherwise opponents to the establishment of an Islamic Republic could have tilted the balance by casting multiple votes each, had their numbers been comparable to proponents of the Islamic Republic.
What I find ridiculous is that a non Iranian person is trying to tell us what our history is and who our enemy should be ...
I am Iranian. As opposed to two of your closest relatives.
Also your romanticized vision of history and your idea of who Iran's enemies are, were precisely formulated by non-Iranians representing western and zionist imperial powers, and were transmitted to you by their (paid) Iranian agents and their mass media you follow.
Go tell that to the Iranian people who's sons and fathers were killed by Arab bullets..
Why don't you go study the history of the Imposed War rather than issuing blatantly counterfactual statements.
Oh, and weaponry used by Saddam wasn't exactly "Arab" either. Something our martyrs and war heroes were and are perfectly aware of. Hence their characterization of the USA regime - not of any "Arabs", as
sheytāne bozorg, in line with Al-Imam Al-Khumayni's (r.) sound strategic outlook.
But this is already a tad too complex for obsessed, embittered individuals to grasp.
