`Lord Ram was born in Pakistan, not Ayodhya`

[raktaka]

What was his son's name? I thought Lahore was derived from La Aur.....................

Lahore was earlier known as Lavapuri after the son of Shri. Rama called "Lava or Luv".

The fort from which the name comes was called Luv-awar or the "Fort of Luv" which later became Lahore.

The kingdom of Shri. Rama was split between his two sons Lava/Luv and Kusha/kush.

Lava established his capital in Lahore and Kusha established his capital in Kushavati in UP.

 

[zebra7]

no stress. now send rss and shiva sena 2 come 2 practice in pakistan. they can form alliance with mullahs and make some more nonsense in pakistan

Mate don't take stress, Its the India and its secularism that allows the people to talk openly against the majority religion. Look how a famous muslim artist draws Hindu godress naked drawing and still not got killed or hanged with blasphemy law. Or look how Osmani living in the country with the Hindu Majority and calling for killing all Hindus. If Same thing would happens in your country with Muslim majority, the one who did won't be surviving a single day in your country.

 

[ravi kiran]

Anyhow talking about it in general as me being Muslim how I should look at Mandir, well I should respect it as their place of worship as long as it is treated as place of worship by Hindus themselves and is a place that contributes positively to their community and public as a whole. In a scenario if they leave that area and this Mandir gets vacant and abandoned forever and nobody is taking care of that place now, then the best thing to maintain its respect would be to convert it to a Mosque without demolishing it and with little structural changes (may be) and interior.

Peaceful Jihad?

 

[zebra7]

So much fuss over a guy who most likely never existed.

How can this not an offense to the religious faith of some community.

 

[unbiasedopinion]

Quraishi argues that it was nowhere mentioned in the Vedas or the Puranas that the Gangetic plain is the birthplace of Ram

Vedas and Purans dates much much earlier than Lord Ram. So referencing these books to prove the existence of Lord Ram itself is plain stupidity.

But in Ayodhya and other places of UP – whose names appear in Ramayana in connection with some event of Sri Rama story – no human habitation is found beyond 600 BC in the past

Seriously??? Does he know about Varanasi? It is the oldest city in existence and dates more than few thousands years back.

However, that goes against the very character of Babar. I have with me a copy of his last testament where he advised his son Humayun to abolish religious prejudices and refrain from cow slaughter, among other things.

On one hand he is refereing to Babar as minority friendly by advising his son to refrain from cow-slaughter where as in another hand, there are protests by them terming cow slaughter as an attack on them. Hippocrates?

He is being minority in India has the freedom to raise the question on the existence of Lord Ram (the main god of majority) and still people claim India is not safe for minorities.


Varanasi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[ravi kiran]

So much fuss over a guy who most likely never existed.

same can be said for muhamad or even for allah.
Peace.

 

[jaunty]

How can this not an offense to the religious faith of some community.

It is not an offense. People are free to express their opinion, as long as counter opinions like the one I made are also accepted. Why should you get offended if someone thinks that Ram did not exist? That should not shake your belief.

 

[Albatross]

So much fuss over a guy who most likely never existed.

Or he might have been a prophet out of 124000 as said in Islam.

Followed later on as a deity by disillusioned followers but there is no proof.

The Glorious Qur’an mentions in Surah Fatir, chapter 35 verse 24

“. . . And there never was a people, without a warner
having lived among them (in the past).”
[Al-Qur’an 35:24]



Regarding the question of which prophet of God was sent to India, and can we consider Ram or Krishna to be prophets of God, there is no text in the Qur’an or Sahih Hadith mentioning the name of the prophet that was sent to India. Since the names of Ram and Krishna are nowhere to be found in the Qur’an and Sahih Hadith, one cannot say for sure whether they were prophets of God or not. Some Muslims, especially certain Muslim politicians who try to appease the Hindus, say Ram Alai-his-salaam, i.e. Ram, may peace be on him. This is totally wrong, since there is no authentic proof from the Qur’an and Sahih Hadith that he was a prophet of God. However, a person may say that perhaps they may have been the prophets of God.

 

[zebra7]

It is not an offense. People are free to express their opinion, as long as counter opinions like the one I made are also accepted. Why should you get offended if someone thinks that Ram did not exist? That should not shake your belief.

Billions of people believe that, and if that man have a doubt, then he could present his doubt with some facts to back his claim, but its an offense if he did with one liner, and not only the offense on the the RAM, but he is attacking and make fun of the belief of billions of those people, who believe RAM.

 

[jaunty]

Billions of people believe that, and if that man have a doubt, then he could present his doubt with some facts to back his claim, but its an offense if he did with one liner, and not only the offense on the the RAM, but he is attacking and make fun of the belief of billions of those people, who believe RAM.

Opinions are not required to be backed up by facts. Facts and opinions are two different things that people often confuse. You can base your opinion on facts but that is not a necessity. Besides, it is impossible to prove the non existence of something or someone. He is not attacking anyone, but merely expressing his opinion which is perfectly fine and acceptable. You are free to practice what you believe in.

 

[Politico]

same can be said for muhamad or even for allah.
Peace.

Billions of people believe that, and if that man have a doubt, then he could present his doubt with some facts to back his claim, but its an offense if he did with one liner, and not only the offense on the the RAM, but he is attacking and make fun of the belief of billions of those people, who believe RAM.

person saying that is administrator. he or she cud possible be a hindu and 2 say such things just 2 make more people join forum and make more money 4 forum. no need 2 insult islam or prophet because 1 person make nasty stupid statement

 

[airuah]

and
Jesus was born in Salem in Tamil nadu

Mohammed was born in Dhaka

 

[untitled]

Hmmmm too many reported posts in this thread

 

[surya kiran]

Then tho, that is Indian territory! Export Bajrang Dal there!

 

[zebra7]

It is not an offense. People are free to express their opinion, as long as counter opinions like the one I made are also accepted. Why should you get offended if someone thinks that Ram did not exist? That should not shake your belief.

Does your logic apply for the same if I remark the Muslim in the same way.