What's new

LoC agression: We reserve rightto hit back, says Army

SwAggeR

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
2,991
Reaction score
-13
Country
India
Location
India
On a day Pakistan finally
agreed to a flag meeting to
defuse tension along the
volatile LoC, the Indian Army
chief is believed to have told
his top general in the border state that the force reserved
the right to retaliate at a place
and time of its choosing. In a
cross-border morning raid onJanuary 8, a group of Pakistani
soldiers came 500 metres deep
into Indian territory in
Poonch’s Mendhar sector, killed
two army men and took away
the head of one of the soldiers as trophy, triggering several
rounds of firing from both
sides. The situation along the
Line of Control remains tense
with reports of exchange of
fire coming in. The brigade-commander level
flag meeting will be held at
Chakan-Da-Bagh in the Poonch
sector of Jammu and Kashmir
on Monday, four days after
India sought such a contact. It is learnt that army chief
General Bikram Singh has told
northern army commander Lt
Gen KT Parnaik that the force
reserved its right to retaliate
against Pakistan. The chief made it clear to his
top commanders that action
had to be taken against any
provocation in a professional
manner, sources said. A top
commander in J&K told HT that General Singh also said that
“moral ascendancy” be
maintained and the LoC be
guarded effectively by
observation and fire. “They killed two of our boys
and we killed two of theirs. But
their act was gruesome, not in
the spirit of the Geneva
Convention. Our army has
gained moral ascendancy over theirs,” former army vice-chief
Lt Gen Vijay said. Pakistan agreed to the flag
meeting a day after India's
senior-most military
commander, Air Chief Marshal
NAK Browne, said the country
might have to look at “some other options for compliance”,
if Pakistan continued to breach
the November 2003 ceasefire.
Reacting to the statement,
Pakistan navy said it was
capable of repelling any border attack.


LoC agression: We reserve right to hit back, says Army - Hindustan Times

This won't die down so easily over the cup of tea.
 
. .
I remember reading about a similar statement by an Indian Army Brigadier when Lal Bahdur Shastri agreed to the cease fire in 1965 even though India was in a advantageous position. We all know what happened 6 years later ...

I will try to find the book I read it in. Not sure but may be it was "kaoboys of raw"
 
. . . .
Just try it baby :sniper:

29th Baloch Regiment & Pakistan Rangers is waiting

Havent used our mortars in a couple of days either :pakistan:
Time and place of our choosing.
In between I would be most pleased if Pakistan calls off boring flag meeting in retaliation to COAS provocatiory statement.
 
. .
The right to hit back and the responsibility to not.

People armed with nuclear weapons responsible for the lives of 1,400,000,000 people cant engage in tit for tat revenge, so India retaliates what do you think happens next?

Yes the deaths on both sides are tragic, more so because none of them should have happened and if the stories are true barbaric but escalation would be even more of a tragedy.
 
. .
..pakistan may have won few battles against India in all it's history ...but the fact is India has always won the WAR... :azn:
..we have the patience of an elephant ...The latest episode will also end this way...
...we have defeated the 'thousand cuts' theory...but can U survive..'few slashes'...
Keep..your Baloch..or SSG's ready for Bana Singh's, and I hope they still remember him..;)
...picture abhi baki hai mere dost...
...BTW, till then let's enjoy some fireworks in pakistan
 
.
The right to hit back and the responsibility to not.

People armed with nuclear weapons responsible for the lives of 1,400,000,000 people cant engage in tit for tat revenge, so India retaliates what do you think happens next?

Yes the deaths on both sides are tragic, more so because none of them should have happened and if the stories are true barbaric but escalation would be even more of a tragedy.

Chill..a pressure cooker has a safety valve which lets out the extra pressure from time to time..the commanders on both sides...atleast im sure on the indian side know where it starts and where it ends..
 
.
The right to hit back and the responsibility to not.

People armed with nuclear weapons responsible for the lives of 1,400,000,000 people cant engage in tit for tat revenge, so India retaliates what do you think happens next?

Yes the deaths on both sides are tragic, more so because none of them should have happened and if the stories are true barbaric but escalation would be even more of a tragedy.

I dont think it will go to full blown all out war. I tend to believe the present situation is because hawks on both sides do not want normalization (or at least the pace of it), but both sides know pretty well where to stop.
 
. .
..pakistan may have won few battles against India in all it's history ...but the fact is India has always won the WAR... :azn:
..we have the patience of an elephant ...The latest episode will also end this way...
...we have defeated the 'thousand cuts' theory...but can U survive..'few slashes'...
Keep..your Baloch..or SSG's ready for Bana Singh's, and I hope they still remember him..;)
...picture abhi baki hai mere dost...
...BTW, till then let's enjoy some fireworks in pakistan

Well lets see...

1947 - Pakistan snatched half of Kashmir away from India

1965 - Stalemate

1971 - Coward Indian Army surrounded Pak Army by 4 sides

Yes, you won all of it. :lol:

What latest episode? Will this episode end like the 2001 and 2008 episode did? Big talk, but all that came out was a fart and a 280 page dossier? :rofl:

Bana Singh was a real person, but his actios were just folklore & myth, just like the myth of the Indian soldier killing 200 chinese in one run :whistle:

Now if India tries to retaliate :pakistan:

BSF will be target practice for Pakistan Rangers
:sniper:
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom