Sam Dhanraj
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 450
- Reaction score
- 0
Lessons from Samarkand for madrasas
18 Nov 2007, 0000 hrs IST,Swaminathan S Anklesaria AiyarI am just back from Uzbekistan, after seeing the architectural wonders of Samarkand, Bukhara and Khiva. The greatest of these is Samarkands Registan Square, flanked by three massive buildings decorated with brilliant tiles, flashing hues from turquoise to orange. Millions come to admire the monuments. But how many are astonished, as i was, to find that all three buildings are ancient madrasas?
Today, we often associate madrasas with Islamic fundamentalism and the indoctrination of terrorists. Saudi Arabia is accused of funding madrasas throughout Asia that preach an especially fundamentalist brand of Wahabist Islam. Other madrasas are also viewed with suspicion.
But, the ancient madrasas of Samarkand, Bukhara and Khiva were centres of learning, not of terrorism. They were not schools. They were simultaneously religious seminaries and great universities, teaching and studying mathematics, medicine, astronomy and all sciences.
Ulugh Beg, ruler of Central Asia and grandson of Tamerlane, built three madrasas. He was the greatest astronomer of his time, famous for his star charts and astronomical calculations. He nurtured an entire cadre of scientists and astronomers at his observatory in Samarkand, the worlds finest at the time.
Omar Khayyam is best known in India as a poet who wrote the famous Rubaiyat. But he was also one of the scientist-philosophers of Samarkand.
Central Asia was a world centre of learning for centuries. Khiva was the birthplace of Muhammad al-Khorezmi (780-850 AD), the father of algebra. The word algebra is derived from al-jabr, one of al-Khorezmis techniques to solve quadratic equations. He also pioneered the use of the decimal point. Ibn Sina, known in the West as Avicenna, was among the foremost medical authorities of his time, apart from being a philosopher and historian. He studied and taught at the madrasas at Bukhara and Khiva.
The great madrasas of Central Asia were built on a monumental scale and decorated as lavishly as palaces. That emphasised the honour bestowed on science and learning at the time.
This holds lessons for India. We have, maybe 30,000 madrasas, most of which teach Muslim children the Koran, sometimes Urdu, and little else. Such children often skip regular school, leading to low Muslim literacy.
The government would like madrasas to modernise, and teach regular subjects found in school curricula. But many Muslims fear this is unwarranted government-secular intrusion into their religious institutions. Some see madrasa reform in neighbouring Pakistan and Afghanistan as intimately related to government attempts to control all views and quash political opposition, while pleasing their American masters. Such fears may have less basis in India, but cannot be called baseless. The BJP touted madrasa reform after a report on national security. Muslims ask, schools run by the RSS are not asked to reform, so why only the madrasas?
Islamic educational reformers include Maulana Khalid Rahmani of Hyderabad, member of the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board, and general secretary of the Islamic Fiqh Academy. He wants madrasas to teach socially useful sciences, and notes that the Koran refers to disciplines such as astronomy, physics, biology, history and languages.
Deoband is viewed as a fundamentalist seminary, yet its founder introduced Sanskrit in the curriculum, to communicate better with the broader community of his time. Using the same logic, Maulana Rahmani thinks English should be taught in madrasas today. Madrasas in Kerala teach in Malayalam, and are integrated with general schooling. The Jamia Milia Islamia in Delhi is a good example of a university with the highest standards of modern learning.
Yet, these are isolated examples of Islamic modernism. Most madrasas still teach little more than the Koran, and there is little Muslim enthusiasm for their reform and modernisation.
The Sachar Committee concluded that the solution to low Muslim literacy and high dropout rates was to open high-quality government schools in Muslim areas rather than focus on madrasa reform. The committee found that only 3-4% of Muslim children have full-time madrasa education; that Muslims view madrasa education as a religious supplement and not a substitute for ordinary schooling.
Muslims are keen to reap the benefits of education, yet Muslim literacy remains low because of the lack of decent state schools, high Muslim poverty that makes private schools unaffordable, the lack of toilets for girls in schools, and real or perceived anti-Muslim discrimination.
I agree that decent government schools can play an important role. Voluntary madrasa curriculum reform can also help. But, after visiting Samarkand i see an additional approach.
Muslims should be encouraged and financed to create modern universities named after Islamic scholars of yore such as Ulugh Beg, al-Khorezmi and Ibn Sina. These modern universities should be called madrasas, as in the Islamic Golden Age. We need to portray madrasas as the legacy of great Islamic scholars, not of Wahabi mullahs.
Let the new madrasas be religious seminaries as well as universities, as in ancient Samarkand and Bukhara (and also in ancient Nalanda, Taxilla, Oxford or Cambridge). Rather than stress only madrasa modernisation, let us take madrasas centuries back in history to their glorious traditions of the Islamic Golden Age. That may be more successful in winning over Muslim hearts and minds.
Lessons from Samarkand for madrasas-Swaminomics-Swaminathan A Aiyar-Columnists-Opinion-The Times of India