What's new

LCA Ridiculed 20 years ago.

Ronin

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
Country
Australia
Location
Australia
LCA-CARTOON_zps8xcubbfo.jpg


India’s Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Program will complete 20 year of the first roll out of the Technology demonstrator (TD-1) aircraft this year which happened on 7th November 1995 in the presence of then Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao.

While the first flight of TD1 was supposed to take place in the second half of 1996, The second Technology Demonstrator (TD2) was scheduled to follow nine months later in January 1997. Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao in his speech in roll out ceremony had said that warplane would be inducted into the air force by the year 2003 two years before the scheduled date of 2005.

Many in the audience were seen rolling their eyes hearing PM’s statement of early inductions of airplane then scheduled. While TD-1 flew for the first time on 4th January 2001, almost 5 years later than scheduled first flight, many key people associated with the program knew aircraft was far from ready for the scheduled first flight in 1996 as declared by PM in his speech.

Air Marshal Philip Rajkumar (Retd) who worked on the project for nine years from 1994 to 2003 was in charge of the flight test program which is a crucial phase in the development of any aircraft and in his book The ” Tejas Story: The Light Combat Aircraft Project ” had predicted based on amount of work still to be done on aircraft’s fly-by-wire system and US sanctions after Pokhran-II that first flight was possible only in early 2000 .

Above Cartoon drawn by Mohit Jayal which was published on December 1995 shows how Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Program even in its early days had more critics than supporters. Adverse commentary was a norm in newspapers those days and Critics blamed two factors which they thought was ridiculous, one was sophistication planned for aircraft which they though was too demanding and second was ambitious claims of capability to produce high technology needed for aircraft in-house was termed to ambitious.
 
. .
It's better to be late than never. this aircraft surely look like Mirage 2000.
 
. . .
And the joke is on you as LCA frame design was base on Mirage 2000. A cutting edge plane back in the 80s.

It wasn't. They're just both delta wing designs, that doesn't mean it was based on the other. There were
delta wing designs even before Mirage-2000.

LCA airframe is totally different from the Mirage-2000. It just takes some knowledge of aircraft to understand it.
 
.
India’s Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Program will complete 20 year of the first roll out of the Technology demonstrator (TD-1) aircraft this year which happened on 7th November 1995 in the presence of then Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao.

While the first flight of TD1 was supposed to take place in the second half of 1996, The second Technology Demonstrator (TD2) was scheduled to follow nine months later in January 1997. Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao in his speech in roll out ceremony had said that warplane would be inducted into the air force by the year 2003 two years before the scheduled date of 2005.

Many in the audience were seen rolling their eyes hearing PM’s statement of early inductions of airplane then scheduled. While TD-1 flew for the first time on 4th January 2001, almost 5 years later than scheduled first flight, many key people associated with the program knew aircraft was far from ready for the scheduled first flight in 1996 as declared by PM in his speech.

Air Marshal Philip Rajkumar (Retd) who worked on the project for nine years from 1994 to 2003 was in charge of the flight test program which is a crucial phase in the development of any aircraft and in his book The ” Tejas Story: The Light Combat Aircraft Project ” had predicted based on amount of work still to be done on aircraft’s fly-by-wire system and US sanctions after Pokhran-II that first flight was possible only in early 2000 .

Above Cartoon drawn by Mohit Jayal which was published on December 1995 shows how Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Program even in its early days had more critics than supporters. Adverse commentary was a norm in newspapers those days and Critics blamed two factors which they thought was ridiculous, one was sophistication planned for aircraft which they though was too demanding and second was ambitious claims of capability to produce high technology needed for aircraft in-house was termed to ambitious.

It is not the engineer's fault if the politicians shoot their mouths off

Yeah, and from the angle where I am standing, it looks like F-22..

assuming sarcasm
 
. . . . .
@chauvunist ...
You are pointing finger to urself and asking All to laugh at you...
..Mashallaha..such a (non-) sense of humour..:-)
..That should make U feel secure...:azn:
..poor soul..:tdown:
 
.
Our goals changed. LCA's job was to replace Migs but it couldn't be achieved in time. Now its new job would be close air support along with the replacements of migs. New radars and avionics have certainly put LCA in a whole new level. Initially it did have failures but we did not lose hope on it. It certainly gave us a lot of experience. It is a great aircraft now and It will help us build AMCA and I am totally sure it will be In a few years there would be 6 gen A/c and then there would be a race to build them. And experience gained from AMCA would also help us in achieving new goals!
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom