What's new

KISSINGER WARNS TRUMP: ISIS IS KEEPING IRAN IN CHECK, YOU MUST NOT LET TEHRAN FILL THE VOID

When America is going to dispose this old Zionist turd? He has by any stretch of imagination out lived his self life.

I would not have used these words, but very reluctantly, I have to concede that it is most effective and most befitting.

The problem is that CIA has yet to brief Trump that ISIS are their boys. Why? Because no one can trust Trump with anything above "Confidential" classification, as he may 'accidentally' tweet about it.

Poor Kissinger, "Bhens kay agay been bajja raha hai"! :D

<gasp!>

You mean they are sharing even 'Confidential' classified documents with him?
 
.
Who is enjoying the chaos? LOL a Jew is now advicing Trump .

Someone was lecturing me that the hostility between Iran and Israel was a mere smokescreen intended for the masses LOL

Well, anyone can do the math after the Jew spoke in favor of ISIS and against Tehran.

Popcorn time!
 
.
Who is enjoying the chaos? LOL a Jew is now advicing Trump .

Someone was lecturing me that the hostility between Iran and Israel was a mere smokescreen intended for the masses LOL

Well, anyone can do the math after the Jew spoke in favor of ISIS and against Tehran.

Popcorn time!
Trumps son-in-law and high advisor is also Jewish, and his wife _ the daughter of Trump_ who is also a high adviser became Jewish too.. so this is not new..

Now ISIS truth came out in the open.. after it has been almost totally decimated..But seemingly anything left of it is still useful in this grand scheme of the US policies in the middle east..
 
.
Former Afghan president Hamid Karzai on Sunday questioned how ─ under the watch of US intelligence and military ─ the militant Islamic State (ISIS) group emerged in Afghanistan over the past few years.

Karzai, during an interview on RT, also questioned why extremism and violence had increased in Afghanistan when the US had come to the country to bring peace and stability.

"The US came to Afghanistan to bring peace and stability and defeat extremism — [yet] we have more of it today. Why? That is what we should be discussing," Karzai said. "Clearly bombings, killings, prisons and the harassment of people [in Afghanistan] have not worked."

Noting that ISIS emerged in Afghanistan over the past few years, Karzai asked: "Who did this under the watch of US intelligence and military in Afghanistan and how come?"

"We have the right to ask these questions and the US government must answer."

When asked if he had suspicions that US bases in Afghanistan "were being used", the former president said that he had "more than suspicions", claiming that Afghan people had approached him and told the him that they are being supplied with helicopters.

"[They have told me about] how unmarked, non-military coloured helicopters supply these people in not just one, but many parts of the country," Karzai said, adding that such reports were coming in on a daily basis from the people in Afghanistan and from Afghan government sources.
 
.
What an utterly despicable cynic. I've always hated him - Galbraith called him a Millimetternich - and every now and then, he shows how absolutely cold-blooded he is.

he is cold blooded. Before Kissenger USA had a policy of massive retaliation in response to any provocation.
After Kissenger you have this. So pick your poison.
 
.
What an utterly despicable cynic. I've always hated him - Galbraith called him a Millimetternich - and every now and then, he shows how absolutely cold-blooded he is.
well I am not surprised, he is one of most hated persons in Bangladesh
 
Last edited:
.
Trump next tweet will be like " Isis are our boys ,very nice boys .. The best boys you will ever meet and we will make Isis great again " ..

CIA will be like wtf man ..
 
.
lame nothing but some farts..

you have been installed with mollah regime by west..

what else do you think is the story behind from paris in love to iran? if the west would have supported the shah (now think what he did against west to be overrun by mullah from west) never ever would they have send someone to overthrow him

 
.
What a pathetic turd, I've always hated him.

Trumps son-in-law and high advisor is also Jewish, and his wife _ the daughter of Trump_ who is also a high adviser became Jewish too.. so this is not new..

Now ISIS truth came out in the open.. after it has been almost totally decimated..But seemingly anything left of it is still useful in this grand scheme of the US policies in the middle east..

Henry Kissinger is a pathetic c**t. This opinion is his and his alone, why bring religion into this? Ok, he is one Jewish man who supports ISIS, I can find you millions of muslims who support ISIS(which is a muslim group)
 
. .
What a pathetic turd, I've always hated him.



Henry Kissinger is a pathetic c**t. This opinion is his and his alone, why bring religion into this? Ok, he is one Jewish man who supports ISIS, I can find you millions of muslims who support ISIS(which is a muslim group)
He was behind a US strategy to divide the middle Eastern countries into pieces since 1973, by using extremist Muslims to fight the otherwise stable countries and destabilize them.. all of it to ensure Usrael's survival.., the strategy is long enduring, that is why you still see US presidents asking for his advice on it.. He is the father of that strategy and foreign policy towards the Middle east.. Brzezinski followed suite with more detailed plans like Al Qaeda, and its offsprings..
 
.
Militant Sunni Islam has long been infiltrated and undermined by these Zionists. This is an established fact.

Keep in mind folks, all jews are not Zionists, likewise all sunni's are not ISIS lovers or Al-Qaeda supporters.

Al-Qaeda and ISIS are western sponsored and Sawdi/Turkey/ Qatari/UAE/ Israeli supported organizations. This much is also established.
 
.
lame nothing but some farts..

you have been installed with mollah regime by west..

what else do you think is the story behind from paris in love to iran? if the west would have supported the shah (now think what he did against west to be overrun by mullah from west) never ever would they have send someone to overthrow him
No, there was no "story behind from Paris in love to Iran". western countries follow their interests and have tendency to put cart before the horse even if it be their best ally "Shah". In fact they realized that due to uprising in entire Iran ,which all people participated and the fact that even most of the army had already fled and joined the people and revolution, Shah had a snowball's chance in hell to stay in power.
As mater of fact presence of Khomaini in Paris happened in cooperation with Shah and Sadam esp after Algeria agreement, Iraq was next to Iran which made it easier for Khomaini to lead its revolution that's why Shah secret police decided to make him go as far as it was possible. Khomaini wanted to go to Syria, Kuwait or Turkey but Shah agents had influence in all Muslim countries back then but not in Paris, but even French Gov asked permission of Shah to let him stay. So Shah planed his doom? France was in Europe and far away from Iran which could have made it difficult for Khomain to have connection with people in Iran. that's why Shah agreed.
As revolution went on the entire country was calling for Imam to come back, Bakhtiar as the head of Gov in absence of Shah closed all airports esp Mehrabad airport on January 26:

It was originally planned that Ayatollah Khomeini would enter Iran on January 26, but Prime Minister Shapour Bakhtiar announced that the airports would be closed. From Paris Khomeini declared that he would return as soon as the airports were reopened. The closure of the airports led to widespread protests and strikes. In Tehran alone 28 people were killed. On January 29, the airport was reopened on the orders of Bakhtiar and Khomeini stated a new return date of 1 February.​

French Gov did everything to prevent return of Imam from not approving their passports to not giveing them airplane to return to not insure the airplane.

And it's presence of people to welcome Imam if you can call it mollah regime by west :


And it's not all like what happened in 1953 through operation Ajax that toppled Iran first elected democratic government by Kermit Roosevelt the grandson of the USA president:
cia-12-638.jpg 1953_Iranian_coup_d'état.jpg

They had other mission by Robert Ernest Huyser a four-star general in the United States Air Force 1979:

71E2hbJ+8ML.jpg Untitled.jpg

General and Shah army commander had plan to do these thing to prevent return of Khomaini 10 days before his return:
1) To make Imam plane to land in other country.
2) Shooting it down.
3) Closing airport runway by tanks.

But 'cause there should be some people to govern on and as far as all Iranian wanted his return and due to not knowing what to do in American administration it did't happen.
 
Last edited:
.
View attachment 430517
President Donald Trump meets with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in the Oval Office at the White House on May 10, in Washington, D.C.PHOTO: MOLLY RILEY-POOL/GETTY


Former top U.S. diplomat Henry Kissinger has warned the Trump administration that Iran should not be allowed to fill the power vacuum that will be created when the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) is defeated.

In Iraq, Baghdad's forces have liberated the northern city of Mosul from the jihadi group and are close to ousting ISIS from all of its population centers. In Syria, a Kurdish-Arab coalition has recaptured almost half of the eastern Syrian city of Raqqa, which became the de facto ISIS capital after the group rose to prominence in mid-2014.

Now, the 94-year-old Kissinger, who served as secretary of state under Richard Nixon, has cautioned that defeating ISIS could lead to a “radical Iranian empire” across the Middle East.

“In these circumstances, the traditional adage that the enemy of your enemy can be regarded as your friend no longer applies. In the contemporary Middle East, the enemy of your enemy may also be your enemy. The Middle East affects the world by the volatility of its ideologies as much as by its specific actions,” he wrote in an article last week for CapX.

“The outside world’s war with ISIS can serve as an illustration. Most non-ISIS powers—including Shia Iran and the leading Sunni states—agree on the need to destroy it. But which entity is supposed to inherit its territory? A coalition of Sunnis? Or a sphere of influence dominated by Iran?

“The answer is elusive because Russia and the Nato countries support opposing factions. If the ISIS territory is occupied by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards or Shia forces trained and directed by it, the result could be a territorial belt reaching from Tehran to Beirut, which could mark the emergence of an Iranian radical empire,” he wrote.

Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards have been advising the Shiite-dominated Iraqi government and supporting Shiite militias, known as the Popular Mobilization Forces, working with Baghdad to liberate ISIS-held territories in the country.

In Syria, Iran is supporting the regime of President Bashar al-Assad alongside Russia. It has provided ground troops, tactical advisers and Shiite militiamen from countries such as Afghanistan to bolster the dictator's ranks.

Both Iran and the U.S. are working to degrade ISIS in the two countries, but the U.S. role is limited to special forces on the ground and a coalition of air forces bombing the jihadi group from above. Washington and Tehran rarely recognize the role of the other in combating the threat of ISIS and are avoiding any escalation between the two militaries.

This has not extended to the Assad regime. President Donald Trump in April authorized the first American strike against the Syrian government. The U.S. government accused the Syrian government of carrying out a chemical weapons attack against civilians. Both Syria and key ally Russia denied the allegations, despite witness testimony and soil samples gathered by Turkey that showed the presence of a chemical agent in the attack on the Idlib town of Khan Sheikhoun.

The Russian government said the Syrian military hit a weapons depot holding “toxic” weapons stored by militants. International powers, such as the U.S., Israel, Turkey, France and Britain, accused the Syrian regime of targeting civilians with chemical weapons.



http://www.newsweek.com/kissinger-w...eck-he-must-not-let-it-fill-void-647766?amp=1
KISSINGER????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IS HE STILL ALIVE????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
.
ISIS is only in Iraq and Syria. It has no foothold in an Indo European country like Iran. Try again, Kissinger.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom