What's new

Khalistan?

Hi all

I was thinking is it possible to allow a semi independent small state of Khalustan, in Pakistan. Examples are Vetican city or Monaco.

Its just bcz Sikh is a separate nation and with Huge numbers but with no 'national' identity. However, Sikhs's dreamland home include both pujab, haryana and jammu.. which will abstain us, mainly, any opportunity to give them a thought/seed of separate homeland...

Your thoughts..

I'm all for supporting them if they want an independent Punjab that succeeds from India and they can call it Khalistan. I'd even be completely open to letting them use our roads and ports for trade if India tries to be a bitch about it.

However, I wouldn't give a non-Muslim even a pebble of Muslim soil which belongs to the Pakistani civilization.

Muslims removed the after affects of Ranjit Singhs occupation from Pakistani ancestral lands why would we ever give them our territory or allow them to rule any inch of it?

Pakistan is my ancestral land it's not theirs.

It belongs to me and my people not them.

Anyone can come at us and we'll defend our territory.
 
Last edited:
.
You want them to leave Indian Punjab and reside in Nankana? What about their lands, their property and belongings in India. In addition, how are you going to accommodate them and where?
Not all just Pakistani Sikhs... its just like their representation... they have to leave nothing.. nor india, nor canada.. nothing
 
. .
so pakistan will donate its punjab for the cause?
 
.
Khalistan is a reality & the struggle of Sikhs for independent country Khalistan will come true.
 
. .
so pakistan will donate its punjab for the cause?
I think he is talking about moving them to Nankana. Pakistani side of Punjab is quite big as compare to the Indian one.
 
.
Khalistan is a reality & the struggle of Sikhs for independent country Khalistan will come true.
No it's not, khalistan campaign abroad is run by sikh kids with severe identity crises who can't put together two words in punjabi, others jumping the khalistan bandwagon. Elder sikhs just want justice and recognition of the massacre along with more development in punjab. I don't know what the case is in Indian punjabi but those are my observations of khalistanis in Canada.
 
.
I think he is talking about moving them to Nankana. Pakistani side of Punjab is quite big as compare to the Indian one.
Aah...
But then again, their basic chant was for a free land....autonomous rule wont simply cut it. I know its just a thought that will nver come true..but what if say it was granted, and you face an rebel movement in the next 30 years...?
 
.
Hi all

I was thinking is it possible to allow a semi independent small state of Khalustan, in Pakistan. Examples are Vetican city or Monaco.

Its just bcz Sikh is a separate nation and with Huge numbers but with no 'national' identity. However, Sikhs's dreamland home include both pujab, haryana and jammu.. which will abstain us, mainly, any opportunity to give them a thought/seed of separate homeland...

Your thoughts..
(editing bcz I have over estimated that all members would know about small and enclave semi independent states all over the world) Pakistan will given nothing to anybody. Its just like giving Pakistani sikhs to control their Holy land of Nankana more according to their beliefs. (considering muslims live their too).. Have you forgotten State of Bhawalpur, which formally entered in Pakistan in 56 i think...so a solution like that
You have our blessings. go ahead, take the first step.:D:D
 
.
I was in Pakistan last month and I saw a sardar jee wearing a blue turban driving his VW. I rolled down my window and yelled " OYE AJJA RACEAAN". He starts laughing and said chal ajja. Dang we were racing on nahar like we are running for some indy 500.
 
.
Khalistan is a reality & the struggle of Sikhs for independent country Khalistan will come true.

Will Pakistan allow Lahore in particular or Maharaja Ranjit Singh's land in general go to Khalistan ?
 
.
You have our blessings. go ahead, take the first step.:D:D
i posted to share views not blessings.... :P
bcz its very unorthodox in sub continent to talk about such things....

Will Pakistan allow Lahore in particular or Maharaja Ranjit Singh's land in general go to Khalistan ?
Partition was a trade off... we left our lands in india and others left thr lands in Pakistan... so no one inherits Lahore, but Pakistan,,,
 
.
.
i posted to share views not blessings.... :P
bcz its very unorthodox in sub continent to talk about such things....
hehe..okay.. sorry for being cheeky..

To be honest. There is absolutely no chance of that happening, whatever you are saying.
Khalistan was a movement of the Sikhs to get a separate homeland, typical separatist movement. The idea of their homeland had Lahore as the center and more or less the entire Punjab, which was Maharaja Ranjt Singh's territory.

Pakistan covertly supported it, led by Gen. Zia-ul-Haq as that was the policy of Pakistan against India at that time. I don't believe for a second that Pakistani govt. supported the Sikhs out of love for them. It was just a good opportunity to create trouble in India, such has been the geopolitics.

Pakistan would have supported it as long as it was trouble for India. The moment the Sikhs start asking for Lahore and the rest of Punjab, Pakistan would have backtracked.

Partition was a trade off... we left our lands in india and others left thr lands in Pakistan... so no one inherits Lahore, but Pakistan,,,

But creating Khalistan means Lahore becomes a part of it. Or are you thinking of East Germany-West Germany situation with Berlin in between ? :D
 
.
Back
Top Bottom