Khalistan Movement Gains Momentum as Registration Starts Today

[achhu]

10% of indian army is Sikh

that is true, sikhs like army job .

 

[FuturePAF]

sikhs are indian first then sikh .

wasting water is still wasting water. If it is at the expense of the Sikhs and other Punjabis it can become more of a sore point over time.

 

[Peshwa]

So what is the latest count of this referendum? Any updates on when this separate state is being inaugurated?
Obviously on PDF, Khalistan is already a separate country with its own passport, currency and embassy...that is a given lol

@FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

 

[achhu]

wasting water is still wasting water. If it is at the expense of the Sikhs and other Punjabis it can become more of a sore point over time.

whole india in one .no wastage of water .

 

[achhu]

So what is the latest count of this referendum? Any updates on when this separate state is being inaugurated?
Obviously on PDF, Khalistan is already a separate country with its own passport, currency and embassy...that is a given lol

@FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

count at least 20 crore khalistanis .
jai khalistan .

 

[Peshwa]

count at least 20 crore khalistanis .
jai khalistan .

vaat lagli re!

 

[danger007]

india was already dismembered and ripped to shreds without mercy on August the 14th 1947 when it lost over 35% of it's territory in the creation of Pakistan..........

Thank you , and we sliced that too..

 

[HttpError]

If you consider after independence i.e from 1947, then no we have only added more territory to our union.
But in historical context, we have lost more than 50% territory.
We can consider everything from Afghanistan to Burma in the India empire (erstwhile).
We can in theory claim Central Asia, some parts of Iran, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia and some parts of Indonesia (thanks to chola empire)

Why stop there? Go ahead and also lay claim on Middle East and Europe.

 

[GumNaam]

Thank you , and we sliced that too..

only an indian would be proud of slicing an already sliced bharat mata into more slices in exchange for a slap on the left indian buttcheck followed by a bengali money shot in the indian face for a "thank you"!

 

[Ace of Spades]

india was already dismembered and ripped to shreds without mercy on August the 14th 1947 when it lost over 35% of it's territory in the creation of Pakistan..........

That's factually incorrect statement. British raj got divided on 1947. India never in history was a country. So india never lost no territory on 1947. Pakistan did lose her territory. It's important to remember that and be honest towards oneself...only then Pakistan can make proper policies.

 

[GumNaam]

That's factually incorrect statement. British raj got divided on 1947. India never in history was a country. So india never lost no territory on 1947. Pakistan did loose her territory. It's important to remember that and be honest towards oneself...only then Pakistan can make proper policies.

incorrect. the ideology of a geographical "india" has always been there for centuries if not millenniums. even ancient traders would identify themselves as traders from "hind" and not some kingdom or fifdom.

Pakistan lost its territory due to its own mistakes regardless of how much credit indians try to take. no one else in the world gives them credit because everyone is aware of the fact that a minority just can't hold on to the majority ESPECIALLY when the majority is a 1000 miles away.

 

[Ace of Spades]

incorrect. the ideology of a geographical "india" has always been there for centuries if not millenniums. even ancient traders would identify themselves as traders from "hind" and not some kingdom or fifdom.

Pakistan lost its territory due to its own mistakes regardless of how much credit indians try to take. no one else in the world gives them credit because everyone is aware of the fact that a minority just can't hold on to the majority ESPECIALLY when the majority is a 1000 miles away.

there is a difference between region and a country. There is nothing called "ideological geographical india". If so quote some those centuries old references.

 

[GumNaam]

there is a difference between region and a country. There is nothing called "ideological geographical india". If so quote some those centuries old references.

well, for one thing, there are ahadith that mention "hind"...'enuf said. secondly, the concept of nation states is only a century or so old, before that, it was the age of empires. so at best, one can only say that there was no "nation state of india" before 1947 and nothing more.

 

[Ace of Spades]

well, for one thing, there are ahadith that mention "hind"...'enuf said. secondly, the concept of nation states is only a century or so old, before that, it was the age of empires. so at best, one can only say that there was no "nation state of india" before 1947 and nothing more.

Again please have a look at the difference between region and a country. A person from romania is european and an irish is also european. Doesn't make them from one nation.

Do you have any evidence of some sort of central governing body ruling current Pakistan+india+bangladesh of that ideological geographical india?

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

That's factually incorrect statement. British raj got divided on 1947. India never in history was a country. So india never lost no territory on 1947. Pakistan did loose her territory. It's important to remember that and be honest towards oneself...only then Pakistan can make proper policies.

The British raj itself was the undivided "united" india that indians still mourn the loss of even today. Is the reality of an undivided united india only decided by the British and not indians? Do Pakistsnis still mourn the loss of bangladesh and cry about it even today?