What's new

Key to Bangladesh's Economic Success: Development Over Democracy!

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States

Until 2010, Bangladesh was a laggard in South Asia region. Its per capita income was about half of Pakistan's. Now Bangladesh's per capita gdp is higher than both India's and Pakistan's. What changed? The biggest change is Bangladeshi leader Shaikh Hasina's decision to stifle the unruly Opposition and the media to bring political and economic stability to the South Asian nation of 160 million people. It has eliminated a constant sense of crisis and assured investors and businesses of continuity of government policies. With development taking precedence over democracy, Shaikh Hasina followed the example of Asian Tigers by focusing on export-led economic growth of her country. She incentivized the export-oriented garment industry and invested in human development. Bangladesh now outperforms India and Pakistan in a whole range of socioeconomic indicators: exports, economic growth, infant mortality rate, primary school enrollment, fertility rate and life expectancy.



Bangladesh's Exports:

Bangladesh's garment exports have helped its economy outshine India's and Pakistan's in the last decade. Impressed by Bangladesh's progress, the United Nations’ Committee for Development Policy has recommended that the country be upgraded from least developed category that it has held the last 50 years.



The next challenge for Bangladesh is to move toward higher-value add manufacturing and exports, as Vietnam has done. Its export industry is still overwhelmingly focused on garment manufacturing. The country’s economic complexity, ranked by Harvard University’s Growth Lab, is 108 out of the 133 countries measured. That is actually lower than it was in 1995, according to the Wall Street Journal.


Vietnam's Rise:


Vietnam ruled by autocrats is rapidly becoming an Asian Tiger. With rising manufacturing costs in China and the US-China trade war, many major manufacturers are relocating to other countries in Asia. This situation has helped Vietnam emerge as a hub of foreign direct investment (FDI). FDI flow into the country has averaged more than 6% of GDP, the highest of any emerging economy. The country’s recent economic data shows a rise of 18% in exports, with a 26% jump in computers/components exports and a 63% jump in machinery/accessories exports. These figures have earned Vietnam the moniker of the newest "Asian Tiger".




Pakistan's Lost Decade:


It was in 2007 that Pakistan caught the "democracy" fever led by the lawless lawyers of Lahore. This led to the return of corrupt dynastic rule of Asif Zardari and then Nawaz Sharif. The year 2007 also marked the beginning of yet another lost decade that saw Pakistan's per capita gdp's continuing lag behind South Asia region and other emerging economies.

Pakistan's per capita income started to lag behind other emerging nations in 2007



Pakistan's Potential:

Pakistan was the original "Asian Tiger" back in the 1960s when other developing Asian economies sought to emulate its development model. It became an export powerhouse in the 1960s when the country's manufactured exports exceeded those of Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia combined. The creation of major industrial estates in Karachi under President Ayub Khan's industrial policy incentivized industrial production and exports of value added manufactured products such as textiles. Now the country's industrial output lags its neighbors'.


With Chinese looking to relocate some of their industrial production to low-cost countries, Pakistan has a golden opportunity to grow its industrial output and exports again. Here's Karen Chen explaining why:

“Vietnam is too crowded already and moved into automobiles and electronics. There is no space for investment in Vietnam. Myanmar doesn’t have infrastructure. India is terrible. In Bangladesh you don’t have right conditions for setting up fabric units. So Pakistan is the ideal location for such garment manufacturing because of abundance of cheaper labour. The investment and tax policies for SEZs and new projects are also good. We’ve confidence to be at here.”

Seizing the opportunity to attract export-oriented investors will help Pakistan become the next Asian Asian Tiger economy. It will help the country avoid recurring balance-of-payments crises that have forced the nation to seek IMF bailouts with all their tough conditions. Focusing on "Plug and Play" Special Economic Zones (SEZs) is going to be essential to achieve this objective.

A video of retired General Amjad Shoaib responding to the question: "Is Pakistani military establishment to blame for all of Pakistan's problems?" He answers: "Yes, the Pakistani military produced Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif....Zardari also rose from the NRO (pardon) granted by the Pakistani military". But then he asks: "Who forced the people to vote for them? Shouldn't the people share the blame for the ascent of these politician?"




Related Links:
Haq's Musings

South Asia Investor Review

Pakistan's Debt Crisis
Declining Investment Hurting Pakistan's Economic Growth
Brief History of Pakistan Economy
Can Pakistan Avoid Recurring IMF Bailouts?

History of Pakistan Business and Industry

CPEC Financing: Is China Ripping Off Pakistan?

Pakistan's Lagging Industrial Output

Pakistan is 5th Largest Motorcycle Market

"Failed State" Pakistan Saw 22% Growth in Per Capita Income in Last 5 Years

CPEC Transforming Pakistan

Pakistan's $20 Billion Tourism Industry Boom

Home Appliance Ownership in Pakistani Households

Riaz Haq's YouTube Channel

PakAlumni Social Network

 
.
Afghanistan: Development Over Democracy
Iraq: Development Over Democracy


Let's be real. Sheikh Hasina has rule this country for 17 years combined with iron fist. There are coups, assassinations, and assassinations during so-called democracy period before Hasina rules.

Bangladesh was in unstoppable chaos during so-called democracy period and economy was stagnant, until iron fist applied by Hasina for 17 years.


Propaganda has one thing in common, they only tell you half of the story.
 
Last edited:
.
Afghanistan: Development Over Democracy
Iraq: Development Over Democracy


Let's be real. Sheikh Hasina has rule this country for 17 years combined with iron fist. There are coups, assassinations, and assassinations during so-called democracy period before Hasina rules.

Bangladesh was in unstoppable chaos during so-called democracy period and economy was stagnant, until iron fist applied by Hasina for 17 years.


Propaganda has one thing in common, they only tell you half of the story.

If you hate democracy so much then why do you live in USA ?
 
.
If you hate democracy so much then why do you live in USA ?
I am currently in China. I went to US because an American girl love me and was waiting for me.

And by the way, US is not democracy anyway. US is plutocracy or kleptocracy disguised by one man one vote.

Chinese including me love Democracy for more than 100 years, we chase democracy as much as others. But if the democracy only serves the interest of top 0.1% population as we see in US, then that's not the democracy we wanted.

  • In past 30 years, mid-income(purchasing power) of Americans stagnant, while the tremendous wealth was captured by the elite 0.1%. No new infrastructure built for 99.99% of Americans, but decaying. I can see it with my naked eyes.
  • In past 30 years, mid-income(purchasing power) of Chinese increased more than 10 times, infrastructure for 99.99% Chinese hugely developed. I witnessed it.

Yes, US has campaigns and ballot, but it's just a show, isn't it? If the ballots can't do anything to improve majority Americans conditions, what's the meaning of it?

So you lecture me which one is more democratic?

Come on, don't be so absurd.

Last but not least, I just pointed the facts of Bangladesh. You don't know the details of Bangladesh history, or do you?

You commented on Iran affairs, but has no clue on Iran history nor politics, just jump on it. Now again on Bangladesh?

@QWECXZ knew it.
 
Last edited:
.
I am currently in China. I went to US because an American girl love me and was waiting for me.

And by the way, US is not democracy anyway. US is plutocracy or kleptocracy disguised by one man one vote.

Chinese including me love Democracy for more than 100 years, we chase democracy as much as others. But if the democracy only serves the interest of top 0.1% population as we see in US, then that's not the democracy we wanted.

  • In past 30 years, mid-income(purchasing power) of Americans stagnant, while the tremendous wealth was captured by the elite 0.1%. No new infrastructure built for 99.99% of Americans, but decaying. I can see it with my naked eyes.
  • In past 30 years, mid-income(purchasing power) of Chinese increased more than 10 times, infrastructure for 99.99% Chinese hugely developed. I witnessed it.

Yes, US has campaigns and ballot, but it's just a show, isn't it? If the ballots can't do anything to improve majority Americans conditions, what's the meaning of it?

So you lecture me which one is more democratic?

Come on, don't be so absurd.

Last but not least, I just pointed the facts of Bangladesh. You don't know the details of Bangladesh history, or do you?

You commented on Iran affairs, but has no clue on Iran history nor politics, just jump on it. Now again on Bangladesh?

@QWECXZ knew it.

Bangladesh ethnic homogenity, peace with India, GSP+ textile concessions from EU, low military spending and not fighting with generals in Myanmar have nothing to do with Bangladesh's success
@vi-va
 
.
Bangladesh ethnic homogenity, peace with India, GSP+ textile concessions from EU, low military spending and not fighting with generals in Myanmar have nothing to do with Bangladesh's success
@vi-va
You confirmed one thing, Bangladesh success due to right policy and good environment. Thanks for Hasina's iron fist.
The biggest change is Bangladeshi leader Shaikh Hasina's decision to stifle the unruly Opposition and the media to bring political and economic stability to the South Asian nation of 160 million people.
 
.
It's a single party dictatorship

In the sub continent that allows you to bypass the local politics and dross
 
.
It's a single party dictatorship

In the sub continent that allows you to bypass the local politics and dross
The investors like it. Hasina's iron fist brings political stability, predictable policy, more friendly business environment, and rip off red tape.

Modi is copying Bangladesh Hasina's policy. While Hasina is doing what China was doing in past decades.
 
.
The investors like it. Hasina's iron fist brings political stability, predictable policy, more friendly business environment, and rip off red tape.

Modi is copying Bangladesh Hasina's policy. While Hasina is doing what China was doing in past decades.

On the flip side

Pakistan has a retarded multi party system with numerous politicians and parties pulling the country in multiple directions for their own interests

We have a ignorant population who simply does not understand the time and sacrifice it requires for economic reforms to take place


We need to follow the authoritarian model to force change in Pakistan
 
. . . .
On the contrary, some of biggest increases in economic development came during those periods
and the gifts they give was destroyed the country next 10 years too . ayoubs gift was 1965/71
zia's gift was afghanis heroin terrorism and gun culture
mushraf left us with gift WOT /TTP / bla bra

dictatorship is worse thing for multi cultural country . we are not BD we are mixture of 6 countries . every province have own culture language dreams and way of life . yes dictatorship work in punjab alone if SSmake head and he rule 20 years may be punjab overpass BD . if dictatorship went in sindh it will be remain dirt poor in blochistan may be it work may be not on kpk there will be civil war . not sure about kashmir and GB . GB is doing great BTW .
 
.
and the gifts they give was destroyed the country next 10 years too . ayoubs gift was 1965/71
zia's gift was afghanis heroin terrorism and gun culture
mushraf left us with gift WOT /TTP / bla bra

dictatorship is worse thing for multi cultural country . we are not BD we are mixture of 6 countries . every province have own culture language dreams and way of life . yes dictatorship work in punjab alone if SSmake head and he rule 20 years may be punjab overpass BD . if dictatorship went in sindh it will be remain dirt poor in blochistan may be it work may be not on kpk there will be civil war . not sure about kashmir and GB . GB is doing great BTW .
All dams that you have today is because of ayub. So jo karay wo bhi ghalat jo na karay wo bhi ghalat

Name 1 good that democracy has given?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom