What's new

Keep the India pot boiling

selvan33

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
1,267
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
Keep the India pot boiling

images


As a former senior officer in the Cabinet Secretariat, with rich experience in analysing the behaviour of Pakistani terrorists, has opined recently, there is little doubt that the Pakistani military — as opposed to independent terrorist groups — was involved in the January 8 killing of two Indian jawans along the Line of Control and, more importantly, the mutilation of their bodies.

The officer, now retired, has said that, following the incident, the Pakistan Army “has mounted a disinformation campaign to deny its involvement in the incident and to allege a diversionary attempt by the Indian Army to divert attention from some recent domestic developments in India, such as the students’ protest over a gang-rape incident”.

If the Pakistan military (as opposed to the Pakistani Government) was involved directly in the incident, it must have had a purpose in staging it. What was that objective? Was it to revive interest once again in the “India sector” which, in recent times, appears to have been pushed to the sidelines, with the threat posed by the Taliban topping the list?

CHANGE IN DOCTRINE

Was it to underscore the importance of the “India front” in the scheme of things outlined by a “new doctrine” developed by the Pakistan military? Reports quoting Pakistan security analysts said that the change in doctrine was a “paradigm shift”.

Hitherto, India had always occupied the number one slot in the Pakistan military’s conventional doctrine with weapons and preparations being always directed against India. But, for the first time, Islamabad “had admitted that the real threat was emanating internally”.

Or, was it Army Chief, General A. P. Kayani’s way of hitting back at those who had begun criticising the military following the Pakistan Supreme Court’s ruling in the Asghar Khan case -- featuring ISI funding of politicians, the Public Accounts Committee’s investigations involving three Generals among others, and the National Accountability Bureau’s probe into another scam involving three other Generals?

Kayani, reports late last year said, was under pressure “from his constituency in the cantonments and barracks” to hit back at the “unrelenting and unfair campaign” against the men in khaki.

In both the scenarios, the scale of the Indian reaction is an important input for success.

PAKISTAN’S INVOLVEMENT

A third possibility is based on the premise that the Pakistan Army is faction-ridden, and that those who do not quite see eye-to-eye with the present chief — who, it can be assumed, was very much behind the “new military doctrine” — engineered the Mendhar-sector brutality.

Whatever the motives at work, the Pakistan Army’s involvement in the LoC incident seems confirmed.

New Delhi cannot allow this challenge to pass, by employing the soft line favoured by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Indian Army chief, Gen. Bikram Singh, did well to reassure the nation as well as the armed forces earlier this week that such provocations would not be allowed to pass without a carefully calibrated but, effective, response.

However, care must also be taken to keep in mind the fact that the Pakistan military establishment wants the India-front to keep boiling, which would allow it to continue calling the shots on the domestic scene.
Keep the India pot boiling - Business Line
 
.
Yes, keep the India pot boiling and gerner votes. The killings were completely politically motivated.
 
.
Hard line is a stupid line to take. There is no need to emulate any other country, India must do things our way.

Each of the possible scenarios should be tackled differently, and can be turned favorable. Only the outcome is hard or soft, we need to know what our objectives are as long as they are met its all hard :)
 
.
I think Praveen Swami wrote an article in which he alleged the Indian Army was provoking the Pakistanis and had raided one of their posts 2-3 days before this incident. Also don't think the bodies were mutiliated.
 
.
I think Praveen Swami wrote an article in which he alleged the Indian Army was provoking the Pakistanis and had raided one of their posts 2-3 days before this incident. Also don't think the bodies were mutiliated.

Does it matter what you think?????? if you make a statement based on your thinking (or shall i call it assume)....... Please do not think or assume... Because your assumptions may look stupid....
 
.
Maze ki baat hai...India ka pot boil karte karte PAkistanion ke doodh ki lassi bani padi hai... :omghaha:
 
.
Does it matter what you think?????? if you make a statement based on your thinking (or shall i call it assume)....... Please do not think or assume... Because your assumptions may look stupid....

Well everyone is entitled to an opinion, no? There were conflicting statements from various officials as to whether the bodies were mutiliated or not. And why did the Indian army raid Sawan Patra and provoke the situation? Questions need to be answered
 
. .
Well everyone is entitled to an opinion, no? There were conflicting statements from various officials as to whether the bodies were mutilated or not. And why did the Indian army raid Sawan Patra and provoke the situation? Questions need to be answered

Well you are absolutely right that everyone can have their own opinion. But my point was only on what you said. Ie. the body wasn't mutilated which was your assumption and there is no truth in your assumption....
 
. .
Well you are absolutely right that everyone can have their own opinion. But my point was only on what you said. Ie. the body wasn't mutilated which was your assumption and there is no truth in your assumption....

There were conflicting statements from various officials. If you go through a Reuters report a day after the incident an army spokesman denied multiliation. And why did we not permit an independent enquiry into this alleged mutiliation. Everything seems fishy. It's not as if IA has not lied before.
 
. .
Meh! They paid with the lives of three of their soldiers during the same episode- and since we have no use for the heads of Pakistani soldiers nor for such brutality- the case lies cold. Anyway the commanders on the ground retaliate to such ceasefire incidents on their own. The blood of our martyrs is precious but it does not require a disproportionate response, we lost 2 good men and they lost 3 of their soldiers. Let us leave it that unless there are further diplomatic steps to be taken regarding the episode.

There were conflicting statements from various officials. If you go through a Reuters report a day after the incident an army spokesman denied multiliation. And why did we not permit an independent enquiry into this alleged mutiliation. Everything seems fishy. It's not as if IA has not lied before.

Uhunh and yet they have lied considerably less than their counterparts, its difficult to even use that term but semantics must be satisfied, across the border. You wouldn't even be able to pinpoint the outposts that came under fire and yet you're at it again spewing your malicious disinformation.
 
.
LOL!!! In Pakistani politics, nobody gets vote by bashing India

The self-absorbed delusion within the Indian media is always entertaining.

There were conflicting statements from various officials. If you go through a Reuters report a day after the incident an army spokesman denied multiliation. And why did we not permit an independent enquiry into this alleged mutiliation. Everything seems fishy. It's not as if IA has not lied before.

The Indian army has also engaged in similar brutality in the past, so this self-righteousness rings a tad hollow.
 
.
Meh! They paid with the lives of three of their soldiers during the same episode- and since we have no use for the heads of Pakistani soldiers nor for such brutality- the case lies cold. Anyway the commanders on the ground retaliate to such ceasefire incidents on their own. The blood of our martyrs is precious but it does not require a disproportionate response, we lost 2 good men and they lost 3 of their soldiers. Let us leave it that unless there are further diplomatic steps to be taken regarding the episode.



Uhunh and yet they have lied considerably less than their counterparts, its difficult to even use that term but semantics must be satisfied, across the border. You wouldn't even be able to pinpoint the outposts that came under fire and yet you're at it again spewing your malicious disinformation.

Did'nt the IA conduct a cross border raid on 6th Jan. which resulted in the death of one of their soldiers????? Isnt that a provocation? This fact destroys the credibility of this article.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom