What's new

Kashmir's ex-jihadists face frosty homecoming

Mech

BANNED
Joined
Mar 26, 2011
Messages
3,161
Reaction score
-5
Country
India
Location
Slovenia
Kashmir's ex-jihadists face frosty homecoming

13TH-OPEDFENCE1_1111589f.jpg


Late one evening 25 years ago, when the rickety minibus he worked on pulled into Kupwara at the end of a bone-rattling ride from the market town of Sopore, Syed Bashir Ahmad decided he was done selling tickets. From the bus station, he began walking up over the Dudhniyal forests, across the Line of Control (LoC). His passengers, that day, had included a group of Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) cadre, headed for training at Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)-run camps in Pakistan. Mr. Ahmad decided to go along, he says, more or less on a whim.

Frostbitten and exhausted, his journey ended in a hospital. Three months later, Mr. Ahmad moved in with relatives in Muzaffarabad, married a cousin, and eventually began working as a taxi driver.

Last week, he returned home with his wife, Safina Ahmad, and their seven children, hoping to rebuild his life. Later this summer, their oldest daughter, Bushra, will marry a relative's son. Sabah Ahmad, just 12, likes the homeland she has known for eight days: “in Muzaffarabad,” she says, “we couldn't sleep without a fan, and the power kept going all the time. Here, it's cool.”

Perhaps too cool. Until the Indian government stitches together a legal framework for the hundreds of families who have returned to Jammu and Kashmir since 2005, Ms Ahmad can be prosecuted as an illegal immigrant. Though the children can lay claim to Indian citizenship, the government has yet to waive regulations mandating that their birth be registered at a mission overseas. Finding jobs and setting up businesses is tough; social acceptance is, at best, grudging.

Growing numbers

Back in the summer of 2005, troops at the Indian Army's Nanak Post, near Uri, watched as four small brightly-coloured specks clawed their way up the mountainside. Through their binoculars, the troops could see the group was not terrorists, but a woman with two crying infants in her arms; the man next to her, luggage tied around his back, was urging two older children up the climb. Finally, as the family reached the barbed wire that divides Kashmir, he shouted out: “my name is Nasir Ahmad Pathan, and I want to come home.”

Ever since 2007, when The Hindu's sister publication, Frontline, interviewed the Pathan family for a report on Kashmir's returning ex-jihadists, many more have made the crossing. This year, almost a hundred have returned, joining the 140-odd last year; the total exceeds 500.

For most, the decision to come home seems pragmatic. “Sugar sells at Rs.85 a kilo in Muzaffarabad,” says Mr. Ahmad's wife, Safina, “and a gas cylinder costs Rs.1,600. We had a son to put through college, and daughters to be married. So I asked my husband, when your family has land and a home, why should we keep living like this?”

In most cases, the journey home involves a substantial investment. The Ahmad family paid Rs.70,000 each to an agent in Rawalpindi for Pakistani passports and airfares from Karachi to Kathmandu. From Kathmandu, the family crossed the open India-Nepal border into Uttar Pradesh, and caught a train from Lucknow. In recent years, most families that have returned have done the same.

Future uncertain

Life, though, remains profoundly uncertain for those who have returned. Five years after they came to India, the Pathan family are yet to receive citizenship papers, or any other form of documentation. Neither has Abdul Rasheed, who returned with his Pakistani wife, Nyla Abbasi and two children to Srinagar in 2009. Others have had more serious problems. Kulgam resident Mohammad Jalil Amin, for example, served 10 months in jail when he was arrested on returning home, though in June 2006.

Zonia Dar, whose father Shabbir Ahmad Dar returned to India earlier this summer, has spent five months trying to restart her education as a doctor. Her qualification from a Karachi medical college, though, is worth nothing in India.

In 2010, the government of India announced a rehabilitation policy — but Pakistan hasn't responded. Indian diplomats, sources said, have informally discussed the issue with the United Nations and international humanitarian organisations, but to little effect. “In the long term,” says a senior police officer, “this is going to be real problem. There has to be some framework.”

Without support, those who have returned are finding things to be difficult. In 2001, Kreeri resident Sharif Din, then a 17-year-old high school student, joined a group of young people recruited by local Hizb-ul-Mujahideen commander Mushtaq ****. Even while he trained for two months at a Hizb-ul-Mujahideen camp near Muzaffarabad, Mr. Din's family raised the money needed to buy him out of a tour of duty with the jihadist group. “I won't lie,” he says, “I was terrified about coming back to fight. I was almost killed by the Army twice on the way into Pakistan, and the boys who were with me at the camp are either still there, or dead. I begged my family to save me.”

Back home, though, Mr. Din isn't able to use the pharmacological qualification he acquired in Pakistan. Even though he briefly found a job at the Florence Hospital in Srinagar, he says, the Army insisted he live in Kreeri so he could be under surveillance.

He is now contemplating setting up a pharmacy, but hasn't yet managed to raise the capital. He hopes to marry, but no one is willing to give a daughter to a man without a job, and who faces possible trouble with the police.

Like Mr. Din, former Muslim Janbaaz Force jihadist Manzoor Ahmad, a one-time embroidery-artisan from Khadniyar near Baramulla, has faced difficulties rebuilding his life in the year since he came home. Having dropped out of school in 1991, he finds no market for his rusty talents. In Pakistan, he earned Rs.6,000 a month working in a mobile accessories store; in Khadniyar, he spends his days helping his brother write villagers' petitions to government offices. He hopes to start his own mobile-phone business eventually.

Manzoor Ahmad's business idea has had a mixed welcome from his family. A relative recalls his brother telling him, “for all these years while you were wasting your time in Pakistan, we tended the lands, we looked after the home, we even put up with beatings from Army men because we were your relatives. Now, you come back here and ask for a share in the property to start a shop?”

In Muzaffarabad, jihad commanders have been blaming Pakistan's diminished support for the death of their war. “We are fighting Pakistan's war in Kashmir,” Hizb-ul-Mujahideen chief Muhammad Yusuf Shah said earlier this month “and if it withdraws its support, the war would be fought inside Pakistan.” Mr. Shah has held out threats like these before. In February 2009, he warned that if “there is a setback to the war due to the cowardice of the [Pakistan] government, then this war will need to be fought in Islamabad and Lahore.”

The reality, though, is that the jihad is dead in Kashmir itself — not because of Pakistan's declining support, but because of the choices the men who fought it, and the society around them, have made. Even the Jamaat-e-Islami, the political mill in which the Hizb-ul-Mujahideen was manufactured, is now in the hands of politicians, firmly committed to politics. Dozens of the organisation's local cadre have fought panchayat elections; its amir, Sheikh Ghulam Muhammad, allowed units to ally with the People's Democratic Party in the 2008 Assembly elections.

The Hindu : Opinion / Op-Ed : Kashmir's ex-jihadists face frosty homecoming

:):)

In its own interest, India must work harder to enable the thousands who crossed the LoC to come home — and to give those who have made the journey back a second shot at life.
 
.
Informal Homecoming: 5 More Ex-Militants Return via Nepal

Srinagar, June 09: In the fresh exercise of ‘informal homecoming’, five former militants, who had crossed over to Pakistan for arms training, have returned toIndia along with their ten family members, sources disclosed on Saturday. These former militants came via Nepal early this week, sources added, and surrendered before the authorities.

Ashiq Hussain Khawaja of Zirhama, Kupwara has returned with his Pakistani wife Neela Begum and three sons. Showkat Ahmad Itoo of Qazigund too has wife Parveena and two sons with him. Abdul Majeed Lone of Bathipora Naidkhai has wife and three kids while Javed Rather of Pattan has come along with wife Nabla Begum and two toddlers. Muhammad Dilawar Beigh of Warpora Kupwara is the only single person among the fresh arrivals.

This significant return is being facilitated by authorities in India’s interior ministry under a ‘Rehabilitation Policy’ that has been initiated by the Kashmir’s chief minster Omar Abdullah. The government had sought applications from families of those who had got ‘stuck’ in Pakistani camps. “We have received 1100 applications. Over hundred boys have already returned, more are following,” says a top Police official of the Kashmir’s Counter Intelligence department. What has surprised authorities is the family liabilities the returning militants bring with them.

The Kashmir government’s rehabilitation policy, which aims at bringing back the Kashmiri boys who had crossed over to Pakistan but chose not to fight, has not been official approved by Pakistani authorities. But the return is being allowed and Pakistani officials have not objected to the Nepal route for the return of those who have been staying put in Pakistan camps for over two decades. Police say at least four thousand Kashmiris are staying in Pakistan’s different cities. They, according to Police, have eschewed the path of violence and want to come back.

Informal Homecoming: 5 More Ex-Militants Return via Nepal
 
.
In Muzaffarabad, jihad commanders have been blaming Pakistan's diminished support for the death of their war. “We are fighting Pakistan's war in Kashmir,” Hizb-ul-Mujahideen chief Muhammad Yusuf Shah said earlier this month “and if it withdraws its support, the war would be fought inside Pakistan.” Mr. Shah has held out threats like these before. In February 2009, he warned that if “there is a setback to the war due to the cowardice of the [Pakistan] government, then this war will need to be fought in Islamabad and Lahore.”

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...ning-kashmiri-ex-jihadists.html#ixzz1xdoRrEzx
What an idiot! This is nothing but nonsensical twaddle from a guy who leads the Muttahida Jihad Council, a combination of 21 disparate terror gangs based at and near Muzafarabad!

That gentlemen, is the pathetic standard of leaders of the so called 'Jihad'! Thank God for that! Because with such intellectual bankruptcy at the helm, they are nothing but brainless cannon fodder for the security forces in the Valley! There's nothing like on-the-job training on live targets for the newly inducted recruits of the security forces! :cheesy:
 
. .
What an idiot! This is nothing but nonsensical twaddle from a guy who leads the Muttahida Jihad Council, a combination of 21 disparate terror gangs based at and near Muzafarabad!

That gentlemen, is the pathetic standard of leaders of the so called 'Jihad'! Thank God for that! Because with such intellectual bankruptcy at the helm, they are nothing but brainless cannon fodder for the security forces in the Valley! There's nothing like on-the-job training on live targets for the newly inducted recruits of the security forces! :sniper:

Thanks to such morons, we now have disillusioned kashmiris returning home. They deserve some credit for the increasing normalcy in J&K.
 
.
We should not allow any of them

No one can understand their hidden agenda .. and they choose their own path now its their density to live in hell
 
.
The government has to step in to rehabilitate the ex-jihadists....
The Army is not responsible for that....
If we dont integrate these returning kashmiris to normal way of life then things will get complicated in the future.
 
.
BBC Report :Kashmir militants give up fight and head home

By Zulfiqar Ali
BBC Urdu, Islamabad
31 May 2012

Twenty years after they took up arms to fight Indian rule in the Kashmir valley, hundreds of local insurgents are now returning to their homes after renouncing militancy.

The reasons are diminishing support from the Pakistani government, a realisation that the "Kashmir jihad" is going nowhere and a promise of amnesty by the Indian government.

"It's no use staying on here," says former militant Mohammad Ahsan who lives in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistani-administered Kashmir.

He is now preparing to leave for his home in Srinagar valley on the Indian side.

"The jihad is over, and poverty is catching on to us; it's better to live on your own land and around your own people than in virtual exile where one day you'll be forced to beg for a living," says Mr Ashan.

He has managed to put together 130,000 Pakistani rupees ($1,500; £960) to buy air tickets to the Nepalese capital, Kathmandu, for himself, his wife and two children. From there he will cross into India to reach Srinagar.

Futile militancy

Militant circles say there are about 3,000 to 4,000 former Kashmiri fighters stranded in and around Muzaffarabad.

Many want to return home, but some do not have the means to pay for the journey.

India and Pakistan both claim Kashmir - they have fought two wars over the territory.

A Line of Control (LoC) divides a narrow strip of Pakistan-administered Kashmir from the bulk of the region, which is held by India.

Beginning in 1988, thousands of Kashmiri youths from the Indian side crossed over the LoC into Pakistan to train in guerrilla warfare, arm themselves and then go back to fight Indian forces in their homeland.

They kept Kashmir on the boil for a decade during the 1990s, but were increasingly frustrated when Pakistani groups, such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, Al-Badr and Harkatul Mujahideen started to gain ascendancy in the "Kashmir jihad".

These groups brought with them greater resources to eclipse local groups, and professed foreign religious ideologies that were less tolerant of local sensibilities.:rofl:

By the mid-2000s, after tens of thousands of Kashmiris had been killed in the uprising without shaking Indian rule, the futility of the militant-driven movement was becoming obvious and there was increased international pressure on Pakistan to withdraw support to these groups.

'Normal lives'

The gradual winding down of the movement has left the bulk of the native Kashmiri fighters in a state of suspended animation.
Those who could raise funds for a journey back home decided to test an earlier offer of amnesty by the Indian government.

Others have simply been sulking as return routes across the LoC - which would be a much cheaper option - are still closed to them.

During 2011, roughly 100 former militants left Pakistan along with their families and returned to their native villages on the Indian side.

Their fate was closely watched by fighters still stranded in Pakistan.

"Nothing bad happened to them," says Rafiq Ahmed, another former fighter in Muzaffarabad who has been in touch with some of the returnees.

"They were held by the Indian police for debriefing for a few days, and were then released. They are now living normal lives."


Thus emboldened, more than 500 fighters have returned to their native homes on the Indian side during the first five months of 2012, says Ghulam Mohammad, a former insurgent who is close to the people involved with the repatriation issues of Kashmiri militants.

"Most of them were married and they have also taken along their families - some 1,000 to 1,500 people in all," he says.

Cash strapped

Mr Mohammad says that between 10 and 15 former fighters are leaving Pakistan every week, along with their families.

They fly to Kathmandu on a Pakistani passport. From there they cross into India and reach Kashmir, where the returning men report to the local police to confirm their arrival.

"The Kathmandu route has two advantages; it is familiar to former militants and their 'handlers' who used it in the past to smuggle militants into India, and it is away from the public glare and therefore suitable to keep this exodus under wraps," he says.

The insurgents' departure comes amid reports of drastic cuts in the money which militant circles say the Pakistani security establishment used to pay them for their activities.

According to these circles, the practice of disbursing funds to various groups for operations inside Indian-administered Kashmir was stopped by the military government of former president Pervez Musharraf in 2006.

In recent months, they say, Pakistan has halved the funds which it still pays to these groups to meet their establishment expenses - such as office rent, stationery, transport, fuel or food.

Militant sources say that these funds can barely support small groups of core activists within each of roughly a dozen Kashmiri militant organisations that still run offices in Pakistani-administered Kashmir.

Pakistan denies giving the insurgents any support other than moral and diplomatic backing for their movement.

Although many former militants say those who have gone back in recent months have benefited from the Indian amnesty.

BBC News - Kashmir militants give up fight and head home
 
.
Kashmir: Militancy vs. Peace

June 8, 2012
D. Aurobinda Mahapatra

While India and Pakistan are trying to promote peace and stability in a conflict torn region of Kashmir, the vested elements like the United Jehadi Council leader Syed Salahuddin emerge as new headaches for Pakistan.

Kashmir is a clear case corroborating that in the conflict transformation process arise myriad obstacles. Besides, it also brings forth that despite the willingness of states to promote peace and stability in a conflict torn region, there will always be vested elements opposing such moves. The recent pronouncements by the United Jehadi Council (UJC – a conglomeration of terrorist organizations, based in Muzaffarabad in Pakistan controlled Kashmir) leader, Syed Salahuddin, indicate that peace in Kashmir will really be a difficult enterprise. The earlier theory that it is the people who are deeply embedded in the culture of peace but the states play havoc in the path towards peace has almost been challenged by the recent developments. While Indian state at times accused Pakistan as an obstacle to peace in the subcontinent and the Pakistan state returned the accusations in the same coin, it appears that even when both the rivals are interested in peace and stability in Kashmir, there will be radical elements who will be interested in the continuation of instability in the region, and in the further escalation of hostility between the two neighbours.

Speaking to Arab News this week, Salahuddin expressed ‘desperation,’ ‘agitation’ over the recent Pakistan policies, termed by him ‘concessions’ to India. His argument has two main components: First, Pakistan which supported the militants in Kashmir in their fight against Indian state politically, diplomatically and morally cannot now step back and promote trade relations by granting most favoured nation status, because the core issue of Kashmir has not been resolved. He criticised Pakistan’s moves to “bestow the title of Most Favoured Nation to India, open several trade routes along the Line of Control and along the settled boundaries.” Second, as he argues, such ‘concessions’ will provide India opportunities to “gain more and more time to implement its own design for the region.” Salahuddin alias Mohammad Yusuf Shah, a Kashmiri, turned to militancy in late 1980s as he perceived the Indian policies as oppressive. There may be some justification over his anger against India’s policies, but his method of violence has in no way contributed to peace and stability in the region. Salahuddin later shifted to Pakistan controlled Kashmir and led Hijbul Mujahideen and played an active role in promoting militancy in the Indian part of Kashmir. In his pursuits he was fully supported by Pakistan in terms of arms and ammunitions and other resources. The apparent shift in Pakistan’s policy has made Salahuddin jittery, and his distaste of Pak policy is understandable as his support base will be substantially shrunk. In Kashmir, it needs emphasis that there are various shades of militants: some groups want Kashmir’s accession with Pakistan, some want to make Kashmir an independent state, and in between there are also militants who are purely opportunistic and for them militancy is a profession.

In the past few days the peace capital generated in India-Pakistan relations is really phenomenal. This has drastically shrunk the space for militancy and its champions, Salahuddin, Hafeez Saeed, Masood Azhar and their ilk. The post-cold war developments and the impacts of globalization, and also the rise of peace constituency around the world, have played deterrent against methods of violence for conflict resolution. And particularly in the context of India and Pakistan, the arch rivals with huge piles of arms including nuclear ones, the realization that peace must be the appropriate method for resolution of contentious issues has gained increasingly currency in recent years. Hence, despite setbacks, some even severe ones like the Mumbai attack of 2008, the peace process initiated in late 1990s and early 2000s has paid back, and been termed ‘irreversible.’ As a natural corollary to all these developments, the earlier phase of alienation and frustration in Kashmir has been moderated and in that place has emerged a new spirit of harmony and reconciliation.

The militants and their leaders perceive these developments as antithetical to their ideology and goal. Understandably, steeped in radical ideology for years and practising violence for decades, it will take time for these militant leaders to appreciate the value of peace and peaceful methods. But, for the time being, they will be staunch opponents of the peace efforts, whether by India or Pakistan. In his interview to the Arab daily, Salahuddin criticized the recent initiatives of India and Pakistan including opening up border for intra Kashmir trade and commerce, allowing people to cross border and meet family members separated earlier, or to promote trade relations. These measures have actually helped in reducing violence in recent years, but to militants these are all just eyewash to avoid the core issue of Kashmir. They have neither offered a feasible solution for the conflict, nor have they given a clear roadmap how to achieve their goals, nor have they proposed ways and means for a resolution which addresses the concerns of all parties including theirs. They preach violence and only violence. And in the 65 odd years of Kashmir conflict, the region has witnessed nothing positive but death and destruction. Thousands of people, mostly civilians, have lost their lives, and the ‘paradise on earth’ has in fact turned into a ‘dangerous place on earth.’ For militants who hold a rigid prism before their eyes, it may appear worthless as they understand and glorify violence, but it is the common people who have suffered the most in the Kashmir conflict, and now they have become most vocal advocates of peace and stability in the region.

Salahuddin does not stop here. He says to the daily, “We are fighting Pakistan’s war in Kashmir and if it withdraws its support, the war would be fought inside Pakistan.” In the context of Pakistan, it is like the closest friend turning most dangerous foe. The boomerang effect of supporting the militancy has already been felt in Pakistan as other militant organizations like the Taliban has turned their ire on Pakistan, which ostensibly under global pressure has attempted to maintain a distance from these organizations. While cautioning Pakistan that it must stop all such manoeuvres, the tone of Salahuddin appeared more threatening than of a plea. It will be interesting to see how the Pakistan establishment counters such threats, and tames the monster which it nourished. The positive point is that the civilian administration of Pakistan has apparently, at least for the time being, shunned its policy of using ‘terrorism as a state policy,’ and harped more on democratic methods to develop friendly relations with countries like India. However, the elements like Salahuddin will emerge as new headaches for Pakistan.

Kashmir: Militancy vs. Peace | Russia & India Report
 
.
Hizbul Militant Returns After 20 Years


A Hizbul Mujahideen militant returned to India via Nepal and surrendered before police in Anantnag district of south Kashmir today after spending two decades in P0K, police said.

Ghulam Nabi Ganie (44), a resident of Pantha chowk area of Srinagar, surrendered before police in Anantnag, a police spokesman said.

He said the militant had exfiltrated to p0k through Line of Control in 1992 for arms training. After 20 years he returned using the Nepal route, the spokesman said.

On June 9, three militants, along with their 10 family members, returned from Pakistan-0ccupied Kashmir and surrendered before police in Kupwara district of north Kashmir.

More than 100 youths, who had gone to P0K for arms training during the last two decades, have returned home following the announcement of a rehabilitation policy for them by the Jammu and Kashmir government.

FILED ON: JUN 13, 2012

Hizbul Militant Returns After 20 Years | news.outlookindia.com
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom