What's new

Kashmir - Inside a Friday Protest (Documentary)

These are 2 different scenarios.

1. Hyderabad is geographically distant from pakistan so people could not.

2. Kashmir was already free, until u invaded and we were called in to protect the rest of it.
But kashmir is geographically closer to u, so the pro pakistanis can just move into azad kashmir and the pro indian p0kians can move to india.
Deja vu

1. You will be surprised just how far people migrated, just look it up and you will be in for a shock.

2. The population was Muslim majority, all Muslim majority states on the border were meant to go to Pakistan, regardless of their ruler. But the ruler decided to join India, so then Kashmir officially became part of India. Naturally, we attacked and took as much of it as we could.
 
.
1. You will be surprised just how far people migrated, just look it up and you will be in for a shock.

2. The population was Muslim majority, all Muslim majority states on the border were meant to go to Pakistan, regardless of their ruler. But the ruler decided to join India, so then Kashmir officially became part of India. Naturally, we attacked and took as much of it as we could.

1. I know, but it was a barrier and discouraged a lot of people. The majority of the southern muslims stuck back.

2. U are rly flawed in the historical facts part.
Raja hari singh had a stand still agreement between both india and pakistan. He would have most probably joined pakistan or would have partitioned j&k by giving kashmir to pakistan and the rest to india in the negotiationes planned for march 1948.
But pakistani army attacked j&k and hari singh was rly worried, especilly after the tribesmen started looting the kashmiris and slaughtering hindus.
Then he pleaded india to intervene, but india set the condition of accetion. After the instrument was signed, then only india moved in.
Pakistani army and tribesment had almost captured srinagar airport before indian army pushed them back.

So pakistan was the aggressor which is also mentioned in the UN SC resolution which u would know if u ever cared to read it once
 
.
People are very attached to their homelands. If I came and controlled your house, and you wanted to get independence, would you really just move to your relatives place? Or would you fight to kick me out?



Wow you didn't even read the news about the attack did you? It was ISIS. The TTP is done, finished. Even if they did do the attack, it would only show they are getting desperate by going after soft targets.
So you admit the ISIS has entered Pakistan in a big way? You guys had trashed all such reports earlier about the ISIS gaining a foothold in Pakistan! You guys are thus in for a torrid time as the ISIS is 4 times more deadly than the TTP!

Good luck to you. Needless to say your media and people like you will now say that the ISIS in Pakistan is the handiwork of RAW! Ok. So be it! What you gonna do?
 
.
Would love if security forces manage to video of the '"sermon" in Kashmir mosques that result in these riots.

The videos should be showed on every channel and debated for days. One of the ways to show how double faced these Wahabis are..
 
.
So you admit the ISIS has entered Pakistan in a big way? You guys had trashed all such reports earlier about the ISIS gaining a foothold in Pakistan! You guys are thus in for a torrid time as the ISIS is 4 times more deadly than the TTP!

Good luck to you. Needless to say your media and people like you will now say that the ISIS in Pakistan is the handiwork of RAW! Ok. So be it! What you gonna do?

They haven't entered Pakistan in a big way, some militants just pledged allegiance and did the attack. Like I said before, they are weakened if they are going for soft targets instead of military ones. I can guarantee you these idiots will be just as easy as the TTP.

As for our media blaming RAW, rich coming from you since your media blames ISI for all your problems too. At least on our side you don't get major officials in the government or army chanting it.

1. I know, but it was a barrier and discouraged a lot of people. The majority of the southern muslims stuck back.

2. U are rly flawed in the historical facts part.
Raja hari singh had a stand still agreement between both india and pakistan. He would have most probably joined pakistan or would have partitioned j&k by giving kashmir to pakistan and the rest to india in the negotiationes planned for march 1948.
But pakistani army attacked j&k and hari singh was rly worried, especilly after the tribesmen started looting the kashmiris and slaughtering hindus.
Then he pleaded india to intervene, but india set the condition of accetion. After the instrument was signed, then only india moved in.
Pakistani army and tribesment had almost captured srinagar airport before indian army pushed them back.

So pakistan was the aggressor which is also mentioned in the UN SC resolution which u would know if u ever cared to read it once

Why divide it if (as I said before) we have the right to own it? The tribesman caused a ruckus because Muslims in Jammu started being massacred, don't treat people one way and expect them to treat you another. The Pakistani army only officially entered the conflict in May of 1948 by the way.
 
.
Why divide it if (as I said before) we have the right to own it? The tribesman caused a ruckus because Muslims in Jammu started being massacred, don't treat people one way and expect them to treat you another. The Pakistani army only officially entered the conflict in May of 1948 by the way.

That was none of our business what the erstwhile king of j&k did.
U invaded them, he asked for help and after he signed the instrument of accesion, it became our problem.
You could handled it differently and might have gotten kashmir.
 
.
That was none of our business what the erstwhile king of j&k did.
U invaded them, he asked for help and after he signed the instrument of accesion, it became our problem.
You could handled it differently and might have gotten kashmir.

No, tribals started fighting back, he signed instrument of accession, and eventually the Pakistani army was dragged in.
 
.
No, tribals started fighting back, he signed instrument of accession, and eventually the Pakistani army was dragged in.

The tribals were sent by pakistani army themslves.
And when their a$$ was getting kicked ur army had to come in.
 
. .
Tribals were local volunteers and ones from Pakistan. The army came in once things got difficult.
The first clash occurred at Thorar on 3–4 October 1947.[39]

On 22 October another attack was launched in the Muzaffarabad sector, The state forces stationed in the border regions aroundMuzaffarabad and Domel were quickly defeated by tribal forces (some Muslim state forces mutinied and joined them) and the way to the capital was open. Among the raiders, there were many active Pakistani Army soldiers disguised as tribals. They were also provided logistical help by the Pakistan Army. Rather than advancing toward Srinagar before state forces could regroup or be reinforced, the invading forces remained in the captured cities in the border region engaging in looting and other crimes against their inhabitants.[40]In the Poonch valley, the state forces retreated into towns where they were besieged.[41]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947
 
.
The first clash occurred at Thorar on 3–4 October 1947.[39]

On 22 October another attack was launched in the Muzaffarabad sector, The state forces stationed in the border regions aroundMuzaffarabad and Domel were quickly defeated by tribal forces (some Muslim state forces mutinied and joined them) and the way to the capital was open. Among the raiders, there were many active Pakistani Army soldiers disguised as tribals. They were also provided logistical help by the Pakistan Army. Rather than advancing toward Srinagar before state forces could regroup or be reinforced, the invading forces remained in the captured cities in the border region engaging in looting and other crimes against their inhabitants.[40]In the Poonch valley, the state forces retreated into towns where they were besieged.[41]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947

And? Nothing new, Pakistani troops volunteered to help tribals, big deal. The Pakistani army itself wasn't involved until much later.
 
.
And? Nothing new, Pakistani troops volunteered to help tribals, big deal. The Pakistani army itself wasn't involved until much later.
U r just corroborating my claim. That ur army had to come in when the tribals got their a$$ kicked.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom