What's new

Karzai admits to sheltering Baloch Terrorists

mr42O

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 15, 2009
Messages
6,178
Reaction score
4
Country
Pakistan
Location
Norway
Hearing news on TV about wikileaks and latest news is India is involved in Baluchistan and Karzai is giving safe haven to Baluchi terrorists. Chalo yee be confirm ho giya.

Wikileaks also saying Musharaf was very very angry on American to let Indians use Afghanistan against Pakistan to support terrorism
 
.
^^

Here's the text of that particular leak:


Saturday, 20 January 2007, 12:35
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 05 KABUL 000185
SIPDIS
NOFORN
SIPDIS
STATE FOR SCA/FO DAS GASTRIGHT, SCA/A, SCA/CEN, S/CRS,
SA/PB, S/CT,
EUR/RPM
STATE PASS TO USAID FOR AID/ANE, AID/DCHA/DG
STATE PASS TO OPIC DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF DULCE ZAHNISER
NSC FOR AHARRIMAN
OSD FOR KIMMITT
CENTCOM FOR CFC-A, CG CJTF-76, POLAD, JICCENT
EO 12958 DECL: 01/20/2017
TAGS PREL, PGOV, PTER, ASEC, MARR, AF, PK
SUBJECT: BOUCHER, MOSBACHER AND KARZAI TALK ENERGY,
INVESTMENT, PAKISTAN AND COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY
Classified By: A/DCM Sara Rosenberry for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D).

-------

SUMMARY

-------

1. (S/NF) On January 10, Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs Richard Boucher and Overseas Private Investment Corporation President and Chief Executive Officer Robert Mosbacher met with President Karzai. Mosbacher briefed Karzai on the Investment Corporation's projects in Afghanistan, focusing on energy projects, credit programs, and the 209-room Marriott Hotel planned for Kabul. Boucher called on both Afghan and Pakistani Jirga Commissions to meet as soon as possible. Karzai is doing everything he can to make the jirgas work. The President expressed his opposition to Pakistani mining and fencing of the border and suggested that Pakistan close madrassas and terrorist training camps if it was really serious about terrorism. Karzai wants to rid himself of the Bugti problem but argued that the Bugtis were not terrorists. Boucher briefed on requested budget funding for Afghanistan. He encouraged acceptance of ground spraying of poppy crops in Helmand. Karzai was non-committal and pointed to British reluctance. Karzai believes that 2007 will be a better year for Afghanistan and called for better preparations to show the people that we were ready for the spring offensive. END SUMMARY

Overseas Private Investment Corporation Projects in Afghanistan

--------------------------------------------- ------

2. (SBU) President Karzai began by noting that electricity was becoming increasingly important for Afghanistan. Electric power from Afghanistan,s neighbors was unreliable and countries like Uzbekistan were raising prices, he said. Mosbacher briefed Karzai on his meetings in Kabul on electricity and other projects. He said new power capacity and building private sector development were key. If and when the legal structure for independent power production was established, the Investment Corporation would be able to help with more financing.

3. (SBU) In response to a question from Karzai about projects being considered, Mosbacher explained that industrial consumers were paying too much for electricity. These entities would be good customers for new electricity projects since households were not paying enough to support new investment. At the end of March, the utility industry would be corporatized, but a consistent set of rules will be needed to set a framework for independent power production. Any private power project would take 18-24 months from the time the legal framework was established. Karzai thought this was too long. Mosbacher explained that huge pieces of equipment needed to be brought in, which takes time. They would be run by heavy fuel oil, but natural gas was best as it was a fraction of the cost of diesel. In addition, laws needed to be passed before investment could begin.

4. (SBU) Mosbacher explained that other Investment Corporation projects included a 209-room, four-star Marriott Hotel. The project was on track but outstanding problems on the lease needed to be resolved. He expected that construction could start in the spring and with an opening within 18-24 months. Much of the material and labor will be sourced in Afghanistan. The hotel will employ 400 people.

5. (SBU) Mosbacher briefed that his organization was also going to be providing small and medium-sized business credits for agricultural and manufacturing facilities, through a new commercial and a non-bank lending institution. These two

KABUL 00000185 002 OF 005

projects could start in 6-9 months.

Cross-Border Jirgas

-------------------

6. (C) President Karzai said that Afghanistan had done everything it could on the jirgas, e.g., providing lists and documents to Pakistan. Prime Minister Aziz explained during his visit that a Commission would soon be appointed. Assistant Secretary Boucher urged that both sides get their Commissions together as the next step, the sooner the better. He suggested it shouldn,t be too difficult to work out the local versus national versions of the jirgas and pledged U.S. and international support. Karzai reiterated that he was doing everything he could. Boucher stated that he would nudge the Pakistanis on the jirgas and hoped the Foreign Minister and Prime Minister-level meetings would continue.

7. (C) Karzai described Aziz as a "good man," someone he could talk to openly and frankly. Aziz had the intellectual capacity to talk through the issues. Karzai hoped the U.S. could influence the Pakistanis on the jirgas. Boucher noted that Speaker Quanooni had been invited to Pakistan and Karzai said he would encourage him to go.

Border Mining and Fencing

---------------------------

8. (C) The Assistant Secretary relayed press reports that Pakistan may be reconsidering its proposal for selective mining and fencing of the border. The U.S. had been encouraging Pakistan to use the tripartite meetings to deal with such issues. Karzai said there was speculation that Pakistan was clamping down on the Taliban and the insurgency on the border as a pretext to get to the Balochi refugees who were crossing the border. He observed that there was much domestic pressure in Pakistan against mining and fencing. Boucher interpreted the move as a sign of Pakistani frustration and that Pakistan was taking the border problem seriously. Karzai rebutted that they could close madrassas and training centers if they were really serious about terrorism. Pakistan just needed to check its own intelligence.

9. (C) Karzai noted that some in the Pakistani media were calling for jihad against the United States. He expected more bloodshed in 2007. Assistant Secretary Boucher replied that the Pakistani media said many things but it was important to look at the actual situation on the border. For example, in November, there was actually a decrease in infiltration from North Waziristan, although the reason is unclear. Karzai explained that the media in the region was not like that in the West, as it was easily manipulated by governments. Both the Pakistani and Afghan governments knew well how to use the media.

10. (C) Boucher told Karzai that the United States believed that Pakistan was now doing more on terrorism. He pointed to an increase in arrests of more Taliban and the recent attack on a madrassa in the Bajaur Agency. Boucher acknowledged, however, that some Pakistani authorities also turned a blind eye to infiltrators. He said we needed to keep reminding them of their responsibilities. Karzai responded that we needed to keep reminding them to give up the Pakistani dream of a larger Islamic Pakistani Emirate. Boucher conveyed the United States, view that both Musharraf and Aziz knew well the dangers of not cracking down on terrorism. He said events in North Waziristan have scared them and they now fear they could lose control. Boucher agreed that we needed to see swifter action by Pakistani authorities, but we should not doubt their commitment.

KABUL 00000185 003 OF 005

Bugti

-----

11. (S/NF) Assistant Secretary Boucher asked Karzai if he knew where Bugti was. Karzai responded that a lot of Bugtis come to Afghanistan. In fact, over 200, with their sons and money, have come. Karzai said he advised them to go the United Nations for asylum, but many were frightened and are in hiding. The United Nations declined to deal with the issue, considering it too sensitive. Karzai said he was "not interested in having them in Afghanistan as it was too much trouble."

12. (S/NF) In his meeting with Pakistani Prime Minister Aziz, Karzai had said that the Bugtis were not terrorists and represented nobility in Afghanistan, so it would be hard to turn them over to Pakistan. Boucher clarified that it was the grandson that the Pakistanis were after for instigating an uprising. Karzai responded that fomenting uprising does not make one a terrorist. The real terrorists were Bin Laden and Mullah Omar. Afghanistan needs a sign that Pakistan will stop supporting these terrorists. Boucher asked Karzai which side should move first and queried whether Afghanistan could take the grandson into custody or strike some political deal. Karzai explained that the Bugtis would blame the United States if Afghanistan turned them in. There would be disgust toward both Afghanistan and the United States.

13. (S/NF) Boucher asked Karzai if he could assure Pakistan that the Bugtis were not supporting armed struggle and that India was not involved. Karzai said "yes", though he doubted Pakistan would accpet his assurances. Pakistan would continue to think India is involved. There is a lot of misinformation out there, Karzai commented. He said he knew Bugti, who was highly respected in the U.S. Karzai explained that Bugti had once tried to call Karzai but he had refused for the sake of good relations with Pakistan. Now he cannot forgive himself for refusing. Karzai assessed that Pakistan had troubles with many other tribes too, as a result of its trying to divide and conquer and turn the tribes against each other. Pakistan needed to address the bigger picture, Karzai urged. (Note: Halfway through the discussion of Bugti, Karzai signaled that the issue was too sensitive and asked that notetaking be suspended. End Note)

New U.S. Funding

----------------

14. (C) Assistant Secretary Boucher briefed Karzai in broad terms on new funding for Afghanistan that we expect to come from a supplemental budget. In addition to an increase in U.S. funding we were working toward, a series of international meetings would focus on funding and other needs for Afghanistan )- the NATO Foreign Ministers meeting, the Joint Coordination and Monitoring Board Political Directors meeting in Berlin, and the G-8. The United States will be pushing countries to commit to funding where it is needed most. He reported that Presidential Senior Economic Advisor Naderi had agreed to attend a series of meetings to brief on where the money was most needed.

15. (C) Boucher explained that several key elements should move forward to support the new money, namely the Presidential Appointments Commission, improved governance, continuation of the Policy Action Group process (which he said was working well), more government presence around the country such as the Presidential Policy Action Group visit to Kandahar, and dealing with corruption. Karzai expressed his disappointment with the Policy Action Group, asking "What is

KABUL 00000185 004 OF 005

it doing?" He said that when displaced people from Kandahar have been returned and when the youth in the South have jobs, then he will be able to declare that the Policy Action Group was working. 16. (C) On corruption, Karzai called for corrupt people to be punished and to simplify the procedures for doing so. On governance, he believed that the situation was much better than three years ago. Most governors were competent and knew what was going on in their provinces. Karzai felt that the Government of Afghanistan was much more in charge than three years ago. He said the police were better and were becoming more linked to other police in other regions. Organization and training had much improved.

17. (C) Boucher said that the supplemental budget would allow for an expanded target for police expansion and stepped up training. He shared that the budget would be more than the normal USD 3 billion, but possibly broken up between 2007 and 2008, with the police and military portion showing up in 2007. The money would focus on more training equipment, road construction, power grids, and provincial judicial systems. Boucher said that the final figures would be out in a few weeks, possibly around the time of the State of Union Address. Secretary Rice would make an announcement at the NATO Foreign Ministers meeting. More details will emerge in February.

Strategic Dialogue

------------------

18. (C) Assistant Secretary Boucher apologized that scheduling programs had prevented the travel of Under Secretary Burns for the Strategic Dialogue meeting. With the

SIPDIS expected arrival of Deputy Secretary Negroponte, Burns' schedule should become more flexible, he said. Boucher underlined that Burns was keenly interested in the Strategic Dialogue. Karzai said it would send an important signal.

United Kingdom, Helmand and Poppy

---------------------------------

19. (C) Karzai asked if the United States was "fine with the UK in Helmand? Are they up to something?" Boucher responded that the British were trying to do a good job and were focused on Helmand. Karzai said they need to know that Helmand is part of a bigger picture. Boucher agreed and said it was important to get other countries to look at the country as a whole and to promote national authority, not just focus on the regions where they are operating.

16. Boucher said that everyone needed to accept ground spraying of poppy in Helmand. Karzai stated that the United Kingdom would not accept it. Boucher urged Karzai to focus on poppy this year to show our seriousness in the most serious of places, Helmand. Karzai reported that Helmand Governor Wafa complained that the British were willing to do eradication only in areas where there was government control, but that we needed to eradicate where the Taliban were. Boucher urged Karzai to consider a pilot project in Helmand and offered to approach the British if necessary. Boucher said that he would be meeting his British counterpart soon and would raise the issue.

Spring Offensive

----------------

17. Karzai believes that 2007 will be a better year but called for better preparations to deal with the spring offensive. We need to show the people that we are prepared, he said. Boucher stated that the spring offensive must be "our offensive" and that we need to hit the Taliban hard

KABUL 00000185 005 OF 005

before they can come at us. He commented that all of us were better prepared this year.

18. Karzai asked Boucher to convey to Prime Minister Aziz how grateful he was for his recent visit to Afghanistan. He also noted that he enjoyed Boucher's recent meeting with him in Turkmenistan and he hopes to be the first visitor to Ashgabat after the upcoming election.

19. SCA Senior Advisor Caitlin Hayden cleared this cable.

NEUMANN

US embassy cables: Karzai admits to sheltering Baloch nationalists | World news | guardian.co.uk

READ THE BOLDED PART!
 
. . .
Bharati support for terrorism in Balochistan is old story. What is more important is their support for TTP, which creates much more terror.

All your claim are without proof and fanboy stories
This one not differ from previous :lol:

Just read original news on post #2
 
.
Any proof? Or even a link for this news? Please don't post stuff that's far from true and make it sound like official news!! This is a BIG NEWS if it was the case it would be on SOME website. Even BBC doesn't have it. It only has a news abt 'britain and u.s. fear over pakistani nukes!' So post a link don't try and insight people!

Thanky ou!

Big news? Its not a new news already so what is leaking about it?

we already know that India is involved in terrorism in Balochistan. India is funding and sheltering BLA terrorists and Now Afghan soil is being used for terror training camps by BLA terrorists against Pakistan.


We dont need support of wikileaks for this. This we already know. wikiphiki leaks are just an attempt to divert world attention from US/NATO failed wrong wars against humanity
 
. .
Whole wikileaks are POV of one or another...


But when such wikileak bash Pakistan its so true that even god can't change it. But when its against India or any other nation its just POV.
 
.
we already know that India is involved in terrorism in Balochistan. India is funding and sheltering BLA terrorists and Now Afghan soil is being used for terror training camps by BLA terrorists against Pakistan.


We dont need support of wikileaks for this. This we already know. wikiphiki leaks are just an attempt to divert world attention from US/NATO failed wrong wars against humanity

you mean the same way we know that pakistan is responsible for inciting communal hatred in india... by providing money, muscle and material... and asking ppl to revolt against other religions and govt and also supporting every other terrorist organization.. in india and world over..
 
.
Indeed read the bold lines as sujjested.Nothing sujjests that Karzai or India is involved. Read carefully 420 or get a translator

Karzai/Afghanistan is certainly involved - he essentially refused to deport Brahamdegh Bugti or any of his associated insurgents/terrorists to Pakistan - which means he is giving known terrorists/insurgents involved in Pakistan sanctuary in Afghanistan, and the US is completely aware of it.

There is another cable involving an exchange between a US official and Zardari where this comes up as well, and how the refusal of Karzai to deport these insurgents was a major reason for tensions between Musharraf and Karzai.

No doubt this attitude of the Afghan government has contributed to the belief in the Pakistani military and strategic community that the Afghans are being duplicitous and cannot be trusted, and hence the desire for Pakistan to have an Afghan government that is friendly to Pakistan.

Also keep in mind that Afghanistan has provided sanctuary to terrorists/insurgents, from Baluchistan and some Tribal areas, in the past, going back to the early years of Pakistan's independence. The Afghan government in fact tried to foment an insurgency in the Tribal belt that failed, and under Soviet influence was responsible for carrying out terrorist attacks (bombings and assassinations) in Pakistani cities.

These cables justify Pakistan's concerns over Afghanistan and its involvement in providing sanctuary to terrorists attacking Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
.
Indeed read the bold lines as sujjested.Nothing sujjests that Karzai or India is involved. Read carefully 420 or get a translator
In his meeting with Pakistani Prime Minister Aziz, Karzai had said that the Bugtis were not terrorists and represented nobility in Afghanistan, so it would be hard to turn them over to Pakistan. Boucher clarified that it was the grandson that the Pakistanis were after for instigating an uprising. Karzai responded that fomenting uprising does not make one a terrorist. The real terrorists were Bin Laden and Mullah Omar. Afghanistan needs a sign that Pakistan will stop supporting these terrorists. Boucher asked Karzai which side should move first and queried whether Afghanistan could take the grandson into custody or strike some political deal. Karzai explained that the Bugtis would blame the United States if Afghanistan turned them in. There would be disgust toward both Afghanistan and the United States.


So he knows where they are. He don't see them as terrorist. Whats more. He got soft point for them......

Terrorist supporter Karzai. He is hiding pakistani most wanted terrorist and don't see them as terrorist and call them nobel. My foot. It will be a shame if ISI don't support taliban (GOOD TALIBAN) after all this.
 
.
This thread has some different cables that also refer to Afghanistan harboring Baluch terrorists/insurgents, and the US being aware of it.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/strate...ice-but-respond-militarily-indian-attack.html

Ambassador had asked Interior Minister Rehman Malik several times about the status of Brahamdagh Bugti who is in exile in Afghanistan. (Readers will recall that the status of Mr. Bugti was a major bilateral irritant between Afghanistan and the Musharraf government, since Musharraf wanted Bugti "deported" to Pakistan by Karzai to "face justice" for participation in separatist activities.) Zardari said he was going to ask Karzai to keep him in Afghanistan: Bugti was now involved in conflicts for supremacy in his tribe. Zardari said that government was drafting legislation to give the Balochis more autonomy and political control.
 
.
BTW, Pakistan's assertions that Afghanistan was harboring Baluch terrorists/insurgents were always dismissed, and now we can see that they were true and the US was aware of it.

Pakistan has also claimed that it has evidence of Indian officials meeting these Baluch terrorists in Afghanistan, claims which were similarly dismissed. It remains to be seen whether any cables will refer to those claims, or whether they might be classified at a higher secrecy level and therefore not be part of this set of documents.
 
.
@AM

And more he knows where they are. He just can't turn them over. Because they are too nobel and not terrorist. Even though killing after so many Security forces and civilians. Kidnapping UN official. They are nobel.
 
.
So he knows where they are. He don't see them as terrorist. Whats more. He got soft point for them......

Terrorist supporter Karzai. He is hiding pakistani most wanted terrorist and don't see them as terrorist and call them nobel. My foot. It will be a shame if ISI don't support taliban (GOOD TALIBAN) after all this.

Pakistan has also, repeatedly, accused the Governor of Kunar/GoA of sheltering TTP elements from Bajaur and Mohmand, and allowing them to launch attacks from there.

This is also one of the provinces where the US has been steadily removing its military posts from, essentially allowing the Taliban greater freedom to launch attacks into Pakistan. After seeing the accusations regarding Bugti and the Baluch terrorists being validated, I am much more certain that the accusations against the Afghan government regarding sheltering elements of the TTP are also accurate.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom