What do you expect? Bangladesh simply don't have any leverage over China. And Bangladesh government knows it. China become largest FDI investor in Bangladesh, Largest trading partner as well. We need them not the other way around. Be realistic.
Partnership and trade between BD and China will only keep increasing in coming years. No one in right mind in business community of BD and the ruling party either Hasina or any one else will want relationship dynamic to change with China.
Yes I agree , and that's why although I am against the policy of china about Rohingya issue , but still consider China as the best and most tested and trusted ally of Bangladesh , and i always prefer China more than west ( I believe our authority also do the same). I also believe that China has the right to defend it's own interest , but just China could be a bit different , could remain neutral ,but that's another topic .
Sure sure.....you dont even understand how IMF works regarding this in first place, just blindly believe your 10% percentile corruption hellhole "95% seats won fairly" "minister" lol:
https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2016/07/27/15/45/Standards-for-Data-Dissemination
Notice the glaring differences between the two standards. It comes from the relevance of the country in first place. One's motive is to assist (those that are puny, backwards and over-reliant on one thing)...the other one has big boy pants already on i.e:
SDDS subscription indicates that a country meets the test of “good statistical citizenship.”
Now you tell me why you have no debate anywhere on these issues given the clear fog you operate in? I mean is there even a debate allowed on something so simple as the 95% win rate for election LOL?
After all @bluesky :
https://www.dhakatribune.com/special-supplement/2018/05/22/what-have-we-done
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Bangladesh keeps trying to achieve first world dreams with third world policies. The reason why this is problematic, minus the obvious is that our goal is quantity not quality. For instance, we have more than 165 million people (quantity/easy slave labour) who are being marked literate based just on their ability to write their name, or when they added a “special provision” in the Child Marriage Act that will essentially allow a rapist to marry their underage survivor without her consent but just with her parents’ or a judge (let’s not even begin the conversation on women or their consent because these are too “foreign” a concept round these parts).
We have mastered the art of fudging the numbers. Scamming the system to meet our “development” goals, but to what end? In the end, the ridiculously large volume of humans living in a tiny New York apartment size country is going to spill over, either like chaos theory or like crabs in a bucket; your pick. Our “leaders” have figured it out; slaves to capitalism that’s eating the West alive right now, they’re paying workers $50 a month and pocketing the rest to buy homes in “better” countries for their children to live in.
If the national policy is to take the money and run, then there is nobody left to focus on reinvesting in the country, which is precisely why we have never returned to a post-war societal status. The real challenge is putting our money where our mouth is. For example the constitution that believes in equity, has never been taught at a primary level as a guiding principle of civil life.
(more at link) @Retired Troll @Indus Pakistan
Ring a bell?:
https://opinion.bdnews24.com/2017/12/18/where-did-the-benefits-of-economic-growth-disappear/
There is some disquiet among economists about the quality of data provided by Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). No less a person than the Economic Adviser to the Prime Minister has expressed his dissatisfaction about the qualifications of the BBS staff and the quality of their work. These are very long standing problems, and yet, very little has been done to improve the quality of the services provided by BBS.
The government is perhaps more worried about the embarrassment an efficient BBS can do to its image with correct data than the harm an inefficient BBS can inflict on policy making and, the economy with incorrect data.
The current feeling of consternation originates largely from the fact that macroeconomic data, such as economic growth rate, is frequently not consistent with other data, such as credit, export and import etc. with which they are supposed to be correlated.
Significantly, the latter is not provided by BBS, but by other government organisations such as Bangladesh Bank, National Board of Revenue and Export Promotion Bureau.
Inflating the data!
(More at link)
And now SANEM pointing out more discrepancies mounting than before:
@GeraltofRivia @lonelyman @SBUS-CXK @Game.Invade @M.AsfandYar @Fledgingwings @Aung Zaya @Sugarcane @Major Sam
https://www.thedailystar.net/busine...th-asian-network-on-economic-modeling-1741114
Who is SANEM? Someone instrumentally involved with BBS data matrix in first place:
https://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Osmani-2017-Final-report.pdf
(pages 31 and 40)
You will only find this increase with time the more and more you hit the ceiling of current over reliance on a non-dynamic, brittle system (that is not even up for some debate in front of BD public) as I described:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/bang...to-economic-trade.617775/page-8#post-11453823
So dont give me your Biman babu typical BS claim of "im a forced mongol descendant and proud of it" crap about "conservative" estimate and IMF "vetting" (they just give the guidelines to an LDC and hope you are credible enough to implement....which you increasingly show you are not).
There is no chance a country being "conservative" about GDP would only manage to invest this puny amount outside its borders compared to its GDP claim:
https://unctad.org/sections/dite_dir/docs/wir2018/wir18_fs_bd_en.pdf
Outward FDI stock of 362 million USD? 2 bucks per capita? Give me a break lol. Same performance as your walton "exports" in the end lol...make media article for 100 units on trial.....avoid discussing have 1000 and 10,000 orders been bulked/commited later...have they happened? Repeat, rinse, recycle and reuse this drama as needed lol.
....and then have a 0 -2 filing rate of patents at USPTO each year, junk credit rating, do about as well as sub saharan africa in science output, earn in lowest 10% percentile as immigrants in US and UK and be consistently ranked at utter bottom rung of corruption this long on top.
Then start facing energy consumption stagnancy this early too:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/bang...rd-chartered-bank.617934/page-7#post-11450042
You have to prove things....not bray things. Capiche?
First step is to let some debate on it (on your TV)......but you won't....because you lot are fundamentally afraid about such things....its just more comfy to believe that there is both "democracy" and "95% seat win" operating at same time perfectly lol. The attitude extends for everything else....and the lesson will be proportionally harsh in the end.
The numbers are so sky high confusing my head started to hurty......Sure sure.....you dont even understand how IMF works regarding this in first place, just blindly believe your 10% percentile corruption hellhole "95% seats won fairly" "minister" lol:
https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2016/07/27/15/45/Standards-for-Data-Dissemination
Notice the glaring differences between the two standards. It comes from the relevance of the country in first place. One's motive is to assist (those that are puny, backwards and over-reliant on one thing)...the other one has big boy pants already on i.e:
SDDS subscription indicates that a country meets the test of “good statistical citizenship.”
Now you tell me why you have no debate anywhere on these issues given the clear fog you operate in? I mean is there even a debate allowed on something so simple as the 95% win rate for election LOL?
After all @bluesky :
https://www.dhakatribune.com/special-supplement/2018/05/22/what-have-we-done
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Bangladesh keeps trying to achieve first world dreams with third world policies. The reason why this is problematic, minus the obvious is that our goal is quantity not quality. For instance, we have more than 165 million people (quantity/easy slave labour) who are being marked literate based just on their ability to write their name, or when they added a “special provision” in the Child Marriage Act that will essentially allow a rapist to marry their underage survivor without her consent but just with her parents’ or a judge (let’s not even begin the conversation on women or their consent because these are too “foreign” a concept round these parts).
We have mastered the art of fudging the numbers. Scamming the system to meet our “development” goals, but to what end? In the end, the ridiculously large volume of humans living in a tiny New York apartment size country is going to spill over, either like chaos theory or like crabs in a bucket; your pick. Our “leaders” have figured it out; slaves to capitalism that’s eating the West alive right now, they’re paying workers $50 a month and pocketing the rest to buy homes in “better” countries for their children to live in.
If the national policy is to take the money and run, then there is nobody left to focus on reinvesting in the country, which is precisely why we have never returned to a post-war societal status. The real challenge is putting our money where our mouth is. For example the constitution that believes in equity, has never been taught at a primary level as a guiding principle of civil life.
(more at link) @Retired Troll @Indus Pakistan
Ring a bell?:
https://opinion.bdnews24.com/2017/12/18/where-did-the-benefits-of-economic-growth-disappear/
There is some disquiet among economists about the quality of data provided by Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). No less a person than the Economic Adviser to the Prime Minister has expressed his dissatisfaction about the qualifications of the BBS staff and the quality of their work. These are very long standing problems, and yet, very little has been done to improve the quality of the services provided by BBS.
The government is perhaps more worried about the embarrassment an efficient BBS can do to its image with correct data than the harm an inefficient BBS can inflict on policy making and, the economy with incorrect data.
The current feeling of consternation originates largely from the fact that macroeconomic data, such as economic growth rate, is frequently not consistent with other data, such as credit, export and import etc. with which they are supposed to be correlated.
Significantly, the latter is not provided by BBS, but by other government organisations such as Bangladesh Bank, National Board of Revenue and Export Promotion Bureau.
Inflating the data!
(More at link)
And now SANEM pointing out more discrepancies mounting than before:
@GeraltofRivia @lonelyman @SBUS-CXK @Game.Invade @M.AsfandYar @Fledgingwings @Aung Zaya @Sugarcane @Major Sam
https://www.thedailystar.net/busine...th-asian-network-on-economic-modeling-1741114
Who is SANEM? Someone instrumentally involved with BBS data matrix in first place:
https://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Osmani-2017-Final-report.pdf
(pages 31 and 40)
You will only find this increase with time the more and more you hit the ceiling of current over reliance on a non-dynamic, brittle system (that is not even up for some debate in front of BD public) as I described:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/bang...to-economic-trade.617775/page-8#post-11453823
So dont give me your Biman babu typical BS claim of "im a forced mongol descendant and proud of it" crap about "conservative" estimate and IMF "vetting" (they just give the guidelines to an LDC and hope you are credible enough to implement....which you increasingly show you are not).
There is no chance a country being "conservative" about GDP would only manage to invest this puny amount outside its borders compared to its GDP claim:
https://unctad.org/sections/dite_dir/docs/wir2018/wir18_fs_bd_en.pdf
Outward FDI stock of 362 million USD? 2 bucks per capita? Give me a break lol. Same performance as your walton "exports" in the end lol...make media article for 100 units on trial.....avoid discussing have 1000 and 10,000 orders been bulked/commited later...have they happened? Repeat, rinse, recycle and reuse this drama as needed lol.
....and then have a 0 -2 filing rate of patents at USPTO each year, junk credit rating, do about as well as sub saharan africa in science output, earn in lowest 10% percentile as immigrants in US and UK and be consistently ranked at utter bottom rung of corruption this long on top.
Then start facing energy consumption stagnancy this early too:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/bang...rd-chartered-bank.617934/page-7#post-11450042
You have to prove things....not bray things. Capiche?
First step is to let some debate on it (on your TV)......but you won't....because you lot are fundamentally afraid about such things....its just more comfy to believe that there is both "democracy" and "95% seat win" operating at same time perfectly lol. The attitude extends for everything else....and the lesson will be proportionally harsh in the end.
You seems to be very bitter and broken heart about Bangladesh's economy. But it will not help in anyway. Right policy is needed for Pakistan.
Yes, insignificant we bitch, demand, brag day and night, why do you care? Why do you take so much time to posts here day after day? Teasing, showing frustration of various things about Bangladesh. Seems like you do not belong to those ''nobody'' who are not interested in Bangladesh. You see, there are at least 25-30 current active members from Bangladesh now posting here. But you would not find them going and trolling in Pakistani economy or other sections. Why do you care so much about what we do here? Then claiming ''insignificant'', ''nobody interested''. Don't these sound hypocrite in your mouth?
বেচারা কইতেও পারে না, সইতেও পারে না!
