What's new

Journalists are biggest terrorists: Zardari

Beskar

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
4,176
Reaction score
4
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
http://thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=19720

Monday, January 19, 2009

Journalists are biggest terrorists

By Rahimullah Yusufzai

PESHAWAR: President Asif Zardari seems to be so unhappy with the media that he told a delegation of businessmen from the NWFP recently that journalists were the biggest terrorists in Pakistan.

Members of the delegation of the Sarhad Chamber of Commerce & Industry (SCCI), which met the president on January 15, quoted him as saying that journalists misreported things and presented the situation in a non-objective manner. They said the president felt the media should be careful in its handling of sensitive issues.

“Journalists are the biggest terrorists,” President Zardari is said to have remarked while talking about the issue of terrorism in NWFP and Fata. In his view the journalists were bigger terrorists than even the terrorists.

Requesting anonymity, some of the delegation members told The News that they were surprised by the Zardari’s remark as it was made out of context. They said no example of misreporting or distortion of facts by the media was given to justify the remark about journalists being terrorists.

“It came out of the blue. There was intensity of emotion when that statement was made,” a senior Peshawar businessman recalled. A PPP leader, who for obvious reasons wished not to be named, confirmed that the president did make the statement about journalists being terrorists.

A source, close to the Presidency, asserted that the president could not declare journalists as terrorists. He said the president holds journalists in great respect. He said Zardari had many journalist friends in the past and at present too he enjoyed good relations with mediamen. He insisted that many a time in his presence the president praised the journalist community.

There are reasons for President Zardari to be angry with the media and journalists. The president and the PPP-led federal government have come under growing criticism by most of the media due to their handling of the situation in the wake of Mumbai attacks. The decision to send the ISI head to India in response to the demand by Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was roundly criticised by the media and had to be taken back. Even before that, sections of the media tended to blame President Zardari and the PPP for backing out of the promises and agreements made with Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N. The media has become increasingly critical of the government’s performance on account of the poor law and order situation, energy crisis and certain unmerited appointments in government departments, banks and the foreign ministry.

Led by the Sarhad Chamber of Commerce & Industry President Sharafat Ali Mubarak, the delegation had met President Zardari to request him to declare the militancy-hit NWFP as a war-affected zone and provide the province a special package of economic incentives for its doomed industries. The delegation also sought relief in provision of gas and electricity for the industrial estates in the Frontier in view of the dire state of affairs in the province.

The president offered to facilitate a visit by the Frontier businessmen to the US to lobby with government officials and other relevant people to argue their case, particularly with regard to the setting up of the proposed Reconstruction Opportunity Zones (ROZs) in NWFP. He also directed some of the federal ministers and advisers, including Rehman Malik and Shaukat Tareen, to listen to the grievances and proposals of the SCCI members and jointly prepare proposals for bailing out the industrial sector in NWFP.

A number of the delegation members said they were disappointed with the outcome of their meeting with President Zardari. They said the delegation expected the president and the federal government to help NWFP through special measures to cope with the unprecedented challenges of extremism and terrorism.
 
mr, Asif Zardari i feel for him he is under so much pressure from all around , honorable prime minister and mr Musharraf and isi and extremist group and public and usa and world community and india. he needs a break from every thing.
 
mr, Asif Zardari i feel for him he is under so much pressure from all around , honorable prime minister and mr Musharraf and isi and extremist group and public and usa and world community and india. he needs a break from every thing.

Musharaf? Lol, Musharaf doesn't have anything to with Zardari. Besides, he was given the presidency to solve our problems. So far, he's failed to do so. what he REALLY needs is a COMPLETE break from the office. :whistle:
 
Actually i agree with zardari this time these clowns have so far refused to call these terrorist terrorist and arent helping the government 1 bit.
 
Musharaf? Lol, Musharaf doesn't have anything to with Zardari. Besides, he was given the presidency to solve our problems. So far, he's failed to do so. what he REALLY needs is a COMPLETE break from the office. :whistle:

he is doing really cool.he handled situation skill fully other wise this could have been much more worse. It's easy to be 'cyber warrior'
nations are not built overnight.
 
he is doing really cool.he handled situation skill fully other wise this could have been much more worse. It's easy to be 'cyber warrior'
nations are not built overnight.

Considering how you don't know the least bit of ground realities about Pakistan, from a Common man's point of view, you don't really have the right to tell me what my president is and isn't capable of.

And if you're pathetically suggesting that everyone on this forum who bears the right to free speech is a "Cyber warrior" than you surely are an Imbecile.
 
he is doing really cool.he handled situation skill fully other wise this could have been much more worse. It's easy to be 'cyber warrior'
nations are not built overnight.

he is doing very good ????? whose perspective - Indian don't like him for not taking strong steps. pakistani dont like him taking steps atall!
right now from pakistan's perspective they need mr. Musharraf ( no matter how much we Indian dislike him he speak of a Pakistani) and from Indian and American perspective nawaj shariff would be even better.
(((((It's easy to be 'cyber warrior'))))))- Dude! its just a forum to put your thought across nobody is throwing a bomb at you. allow other to put their views too.
nations are not built overnight. Pakistan and India are 60 yr old nation and democratic nation too. these nation building democracy and politician have kept us at bay or else both the nation would have been somewhere else, so this time theory - of let them have more time is stupid its time to take action from both side but an intelligent one not a dumb one.
 
Iam expecting Zardari to replace the humorous character who has left the office recently:) he has the potential to do this.....after all we all need a new clown too..lol:)
 
Unfortunately this is one thing on which I have to agree with Asif Bhutto Zardari.:bounce:

Yeah exactly. I completely agree with him on this. It's a surprising response from him. But in all honesty, Our Media has gone haywire and would basically report anything, and everything for the sake of Ratings. Specially, Geo. There's a strong outrage from the common man's perspective about Geo. Boycotting is the first step!
 
But still think about what a big deal Zardari and the like would have made of this if Musharraf had said this while they were clawing for power...
 
he is doing very good ????? whose perspective - Indian don't like him for not taking strong steps. pakistani dont like him taking steps atall!
right now from pakistan's perspective they need mr. Musharraf ( no matter how much we Indian dislike him he speak of a Pakistani) and from Indian and American perspective nawaj shariff would be even better.
(((((It's easy to be 'cyber warrior'))))))- Dude! its just a forum to put your thought across nobody is throwing a bomb at you. allow other to put their views too.
nations are not built overnight. Pakistan and India are 60 yr old nation and democratic nation too. these nation building democracy and politician have kept us at bay or else both the nation would have been somewhere else, so this time theory - of let them have more time is stupid its time to take action from both side but an intelligent one not a dumb one.

It seem's you do not know much about domestic Pakistani politics.

First of all, Zardari is more popular than Musharraf in Pakistan. According to the latest Gallup survey 19% Pakistani's are strongly in favor of his presidency against the 17% when Musharraf held office. This is a defence forum, hence you will find more people supporting Musharraf.

Secondly, America will NEVER accept Nawaz Sharif. They have tried controlling him before but he has a mind of his own.
 
It seem's you do not know much about domestic Pakistani politics.

First of all, Zardari is more popular than Musharraf in Pakistan. According to the latest Gallup survey 19% Pakistani's are strongly in favor of his presidency against the 17% when Musharraf held office. This is a defence forum, hence you will find more people supporting Musharraf.

Secondly, America will NEVER accept Nawaz Sharif. They have tried controlling him before but he has a mind of his own.

Musharraf was President for eight years. Which time period was your supposed "Popularity" poll taken in?
 
It seem's you do not know much about domestic Pakistani politics.

First of all, Zardari is more popular than Musharraf in Pakistan. According to the latest Gallup survey 19% Pakistani's are strongly in favor of his presidency against the 17% when Musharraf held office. This is a defence forum, hence you will find more people supporting Musharraf.

Secondly, America will NEVER accept Nawaz Sharif. They have tried controlling him before but he has a mind of his own.

Who is America to decide weather to accept Nawaz Shrif or not if people chooses he has to be chosen one.
Every time I hear army or america did not agree to his candidature for prime minister or president I wonder what is its use if it is veto by these "gun" forces?
 
Back
Top Bottom