Jihad ul Mutah in Najf ?

[Bratva]

@al-Hasani @Arabian Legend @Yzd Khalifa

Would you summarize what lady is saying ?

 

[Dubious]

what the hell is jihad ul mutah?

 

[-SINAN-]

what the hell is jihad ul mutah?

As far as i know, something like "Sex Jihad"....which encourages woman to go and have sex with Jihadist so, they would perform better in fighting...

Sick people and their sick methods.

 

[Dubious]

As far as i know, something like "Sex Jihad"....which encourages woman to go and have sex with Jihadist so, they would perform better in fighting...

Sick people and their sick methods.

thats disgusting!! yuck!!

 

[Jf Thunder]

KILL THESE TYPE OF JIHADIS

 

[JonAsad]

Its talking about contractual marriage for the purpose of sex for the Jihadis-

Temporary wife until the jihadi dies or mutually agreed time limit-

 

[Imran Khan]

enjoooooooooooooooooy jihadiyo

 

[TheFlyingPretzel]

Its talking about contractual marriage for the purpose of sex for the Jihadis-

Temporary wife until the jihadi dies or mutually agreed time limit-

How is that any different from paying for prostitutes?

As a matter of fact how is nikkah, in general, any different from contracting with a prostitute? In nikkah a a contract is signed in front of witnesses where a woman consents to fulfilling her conjugal duties to a man (euphemistic way of saying "opening her legs on demand"), who in turn gives her money (dower: haq-mehr) and, in most cases, takes her home with him. In prostitution, a woman consents to providing the same service in exchange for money based on an oral agreement, to which the contracting male's close friends are, more often than not, witnesses. With the exception of the permission of the Wali in the former case, am I missing something?

 

[Jf Thunder]

How is that any different from paying for prostitutes?

As a matter of fact how is nikkah, in general, any different from contracting with a prostitute? In nikkah a a contract is signed in front of witnesses where a woman consents to fulfilling her conjugal duties to a man (euphemistic way of saying "opening her legs on demand"), who in turn gives her money (dower: haq-mehr) and, in most cases, takes her home with him. In prostitution, a woman consents to providing the same service in exchange for money based on an oral agreement, to which the contracting male's close friends are, more often than not, witnesses. With the exception of the permission of the Wali in the former case, am I missing something?

Nikah is long term and it is based on respect, love and affection, and just fulfilling your desires, you also have to raise kids.
while prostitution attracts only sick minded people like you who try to tangle pure and positive things with shit

Its talking about contractual marriage for the purpose of sex for the Jihadis-

Temporary wife until the jihadi dies or mutually agreed time limit-

your signature, i think it was "Arab leaders" not "Muslim leaders"

 

[!eon]

This is special offer for shia fighters coming from Pakistan to Iraq

 

[TheFlyingPretzel]

Nikah is long term and it is based on respect, love and affection, and just fulfilling your desires, you also have to raise kids.
while prostitution attracts only sick minded people like you who try to tangle pure and positive things with shit


your signature, i think it was "Arab leaders" not "Muslim leaders"

There's no need to get personal. The debate is academic, raised by a "female" peer of mine who works in the development sector for the uplift of women.

Nikkah is not based on love and affection. Owing largely to the almost absent interaction between men and women in a strict Islamic society (observing the veil), it is all but impossible for believing boys and girls to grow fond and affectionate of each other before marriage. Marriages are usually contracted by the Walis of the children and therefore are grounded in convenience rather than affection. Nikkah, under Islamic law, is a strict contractual agreement which seeks to establish a working relationship between man and woman pursuant to which both the man and woman can satisfy their physical needs and also rear children who can be taught Islamic values and grow up to become God-fearing, contributing citizens.

Nikkah is meant to be long-term. Correct. Unless you consider the Shiite contract of Mutah, which is prostitution through and through.

 

[Jf Thunder]

There's no need to get personal. The debate is academic, raised by a "female" peer of mine who works in the development sector for the uplift of women.

Nikkah is not based on love and affection. Owing largely to the almost absent interaction between men and women in a strict Islamic society (observing the veil), it is all but impossible for believing boys and girls to grow fond and affectionate of each other. Marriages are usually contracted by the Walis of the children and therefore are grounded in convenience rather than affection. Nikkah, under Islamic law, is a strict contractual agreement which seeks to establish a working relationship between man and woman pursuant to which both the man and woman can satisfy their physical needs and also rear children who can be taught Islamic values and grow up to become God-fearing, contributing citizens.

that i am against, i believe that the boy and girl should first like each other and give their consent only then can they live with love and respect, i think arranged marriage should only be for a last resort in case their ages are passing and they are un able to find a good match for themselves, dont you agree?
also i am against the full face veil although i think the "dopatta" or the Hijab is sufficient


and sorry for getting personal, i will delete that part right i way, i apologize truly

 

[TheFlyingPretzel]

that i am against, i believe that the boy and girl should first like each other and give their consent only then can they live with love and respect, i think arranged marriage should only be for a last resort in case their ages are passing and they are un able to find a good match for themselves, dont you agree?
also i am against the full face veil although i think the "dopatta" or the Hijab is sufficient
and sorry for getting personal, i will delete that part right i way, i apologize truly

It is important to note that even in a contract marriage, consent is a compulsory requirement, although the extent to which that requirement is observed in most marriages is highly questionable. In nikkah, if either the man or the woman refuses to consent to the arrangement, the nikkah is null and void.

Also, do you mean to suggest you are against a prime tenet of Islam? That's not an advisable position to take in an increasingly ultra-religious society like Pakistan. I can't say whether I agree or disagree because the requirement of the veil is an essential component of the Islamic way of life and, therefore, my opinion on the matter would be to no end.

Reverting back to the topic, here's a concise comparison of both the arrangements:

Requirements of a nikkah:

1. Consent, in the absence of which the marriage is void ab initio;
2. Capacity to contract, although in the cases of child marriages the parents can contract on behalf of the children and when the child reaches the age where he/she develops the capacity, they can either choose to accept the marriage or revoke it in which case it stands dissolved.
3. Witnesses;
4. Written contract;
5. Permission of the Wali;
6. Money - Haq-Mehr;

Practices usually observed in prostitution:

1. Consent of the sex-worker, in the absence of which it becomes statutory rape;
2. Capacity to contract. Most sex-workers engaged in the business are mature enough to understand the simple arrangement which they are entering into. Sex for money.
3. Witnesses are only a requirement where proof of the contract is required and is only true for cases where prostitution is legal and entirely oral e.g. countries like Amsterdam.
4. Agreements with sex-workers are usually oral. In countries where prostitution is illegal, the contract itself is without legal force but that does not negate the fact that an illegal 'arrangement' has nonetheless been entered into;
5. No requirement. This is the only way in which prostitution differs from nikkah. Also as you rightfully pointed out, nikkah agreements tend to be of a longer duration than contracts with prostitutes;
6. Money is given to the sex-worker in exchange for the service.

With the absence of regulatory law which governs and protects sex-workers, as is the case for marriage, the two arrangements bear resounding similarities, so much so that it may appear to shock the senses and that is completely understandable.

 

[R2D2]

This is pure Iranian propaganda. First they said wealthy Saudis and Qataris are buying young virgin Syrian girls from Refugee Camps in Lebanon and now they have started this propaganda.

It is well known that Arab fighters married in Afghanistan and tribal areas and their brave children are now fighting against the American there.

It is also well known that Mutah or marriage for fixed duration is not allowed in Sunni Islam and that the Safavid Shias practice it extensively in Iran.

In fact, most of the prostitutes in Pakistan convert to the Shia faith as it gives them internal satisfaction from their disturbed conscience that they are not doing something illegal and immoral.

 

[al-Hasani]

THE VIDEO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SUNNI MUSLIMS. WHY ARE PEOPLE COMMENTING ON A ARABIC VIDEO THAT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF?