Jharkhand Court Convicts 11 'Gau Rakshaks' of Murder in Alimuddin Lynching Case

[Path-Finder]

https://thewire.in/communalism/jharkhand-court-convicts-11-of-murder-in-beef-lynching-case

 

[Joe Shearer]

https://thewire.in/communalism/jharkhand-court-convicts-11-of-murder-in-beef-lynching-case

Please print the rest of the printed matter, and not simply the URL.

Thank you for this sustained evidence that the Indian judicial system works, perhaps rather better than others in South Asia.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Please print the rest of the printed matter, and not simply the URL.

Thank you for this sustained evidence that the Indian judicial system works, perhaps rather better than others in South Asia.

You can boast when we see these despicable rats hanging on the gallows, till then, I will advise caution. Justice is not served, yet.

 

[Joe Shearer]

You can boast when we see these despicable rats hanging on the gallows, till then, I will advise caution. Justice is not served, yet.

As it happens, this was only the judgement. The sentencing has not been done. It is unlikely that they will be sentenced to death. Indian courts try to avoid it.

On another set of decisions, the courts have been quite firm in their dealings with some of the egregious and autocratic aspects of the current government; the Aadhaar case is a good example. Meanwhile, loose cannons like Subrahmaniam Swamy, who is a busybody always engaged in anything and everything that doesn't concern him, have been restrained by the courts. These instances go on and on, along with instances of the other kind, the leaning towards the BJP kind.

There is no reason, however, to doubt that justice will be served.

 

[Maarkhoor]

perhaps rather better than others in South Asia.

Don't start jumping Sir, they still have right to appeal and Sadvi and Col they will set free by higher courts.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Don't start jumping Sir, they still have right to appeal and Sadvi and Col they will set free by higher courts.

An appeal will not relieve them from being convicts.

And Purohit is only granted a bail. And Sadvi has a different destiny, she is suffering from Cancer.

 

[Maarkhoor]

An appeal will not relieve them from being convicts.

And Purohit is only granted a bail. And Sadvi has a different destiny, she is suffering from Cancer.

Excuses lolsss

 

[Chhatrapati]

Excuses lolsss

Can't help if you live in banana republic where law and order are based on mob opinion.

 

[Maarkhoor]

Can't help if you live in banana republic where law and order are based on mob opinion.

you are talking about India = Banana republic ?

 

[Chhatrapati]

you are talking about India = Banana republic ?

I'm not calling anyone Banana republic. But saying, any action taken is completely based on law of the land. Not based on the opinion of a group of people.

 

[Maarkhoor]

I'm not calling anyone Banana republic. But saying, any action taken is completely based on law of the land. Not based on the opinion of a group of people.

lolsss

goons patrol streets to protect cows while women being raped on moving buses.

 

[Chhatrapati]

lolsss

goons patrol streets to protect cows while women being raped on moving buses.

And whoever does that gets arrested and put in Jail.

 

[Chaosmaster]

lolsss

goons patrol streets to protect cows while women being raped on moving buses.

Coming from Pak, that's really cute. Terrorists roaming the street and trying to start a political party. And like crime doesn't happen in ur country. We all know the infamous cases of lynching in pak as well.
Action gets taken. Period.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

As it happens, this was only the judgement. The sentencing has not been done. It is unlikely that they will be sentenced to death. Indian courts try to avoid it.

On another set of decisions, the courts have been quite firm in their dealings with some of the egregious and autocratic aspects of the current government; the Aadhaar case is a good example. Meanwhile, loose cannons like Subrahmaniam Swamy, who is a busybody always engaged in anything and everything that doesn't concern him, have been restrained by the courts. These instances go on and on, along with instances of the other kind, the leaning towards the BJP kind.

There is no reason, however, to doubt that justice will be served.

When you are boasting that Indian justice system is better then south Asian countries , you have to prove it. For instances here in Pakistan, we have send quite a lot to gallows on charges of terrorism. That for us is justice. So if your courts are reluctant to send murderers to gallows, that doesn't meet our criteria of justice. Which raise another question about Indian justice when Ajmal Kasab and Afzal Guru were hanged in a hurry, why court don't show similar enthusiasm when dispatching the hindu terrorists and the ones belonging to Hindu right-wing parties.

At the end of day its non of my concern how Indian justice works neither I am bothered but when you bring in your d!ck measuring contest and invoke whole south Asian region, na I am sorry that's BS. According to our understanding of justice, yours comes no where near.

 

[Joe Shearer]

When you are boasting that Indian justice system is better then south Asian countries , you have to prove it. For instances here in Pakistan, we have send quite a lot to gallows on charges of terrorism. That for us is justice. So if your courts are reluctant to send murderers to gallows, that doesn't meet our criteria of justice. Which raise another question about Indian justice when Ajmal Kasab and Afzal Guru were hanged in a hurry, why court don't show similar enthusiasm when dispatching the hindu terrorists and the ones belonging to Hindu right-wing parties.

At the end of day its non of my concern how Indian justice works neither I am bothered but when you bring in your d!ck measuring contest and invoke whole south Asian region, na I am sorry that's BS. According to our understanding of justice, yours comes no where near.

First, it was hardly a boast; I made a statement of fact, and if someone reading it considers it boastful, so be it. Second, I have to prove nothing. In your own words, it is none of your concern, with no background other than unrestrained and unfettered hyper-patriotism, how Indian justice works, and there is no need for you to be bothered. Your words make it clear that you are merely being defensive and merely seeking to show that you are working against terrorism, proving it by the number of hangings that you have to show.

To a less unbalanced view, it might have seemed prudent not to make a song-and-dance about it, and to avoid drawing attention to the large number of terrorists you have managed to generate, and to the disbelief of the world to your constant protests of having fought a great fight against terrorism.

The facts speak for themselves; those guilty of a crime were caught, arraigned, tried and convicted, and will soon be sentenced. That they were members of the majority community did not come in the way. They will not be executed, in all probability, because they were not terrorists, and their crimes were not against the state, their crime was one of murder, and it is now no longer the practice in civilised states to execute murderers, except in the rarest of rare cases. In any case, the sentences have not been pronounced, so what is all the excitement about?

You mentioned that you sent terrorists to the gallows. A few sentences later, you are awash with crocodile tears, mourning the judicial execution of terrorists. Could you please make up your mind?

Finally, when you speak about your jaundiced view of how terrorists have been dealt with, you appear to forget that in the two cases you mentioned, the full judicial cycle was gone through, and every opportunity given to the two for legal defence and for fair trial, NOT by a military court and its compulsion to show results even at the cost of harsh sentencing, but by the judicial system as it is and as it should be. It is not clear that you have even a clue when you talk about undue haste, considering that every avenue was explored by the defence, right up to and including appeals for clemency to the President.

You compared those two to the cases of 'Hindu' terrorists arraigned and undergoing trial. Of course, that is a dead giveaway; a mind that thinks of 'Hindu' terrorist and 'Muslim' terrorist betrays its completely unsound processes of thought before even going into the merits of the arguments that it trots out. There was no attempt at measuring 'dicks', to use your uncouth phrasing, except, perhaps, in your own clouded thinking. That such a possibility is the only thing that comes to mind displays only a deep-rooted sense of insecurity and of inadequacy; a well-functioning judiciary and legal system needs no such frenzied and manic responses of the type that we have had to read.

Finally, your thoughts display a huge gulf between your thinking about justice and the ends of justice, and the thinking that prevails in the society that you have chosen to be in. This attitude of dispensing justice through the hangman's noose is perhaps acceptable in your country of origin; it must be painful to adjust these primitive notions and its formative regressive mindset to the very different notions that British society has chosen to follow.