What's new

Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun: Chinese "aircraft carrier killer" missile launch experiment on a moving ship with two hits

GS Zhou

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 10, 2015
Messages
2,455
Reaction score
5
Country
China
Location
China
The original news content in Japanese, but converted to English by Google Translation. Link is attached below.



[Beijing = Takayuki Nakagawa, Washington = Kazuhiko Makita] The inside of the Chinese army that the Chinese army was targeting a moving ship during the launch test of an anti-ship ballistic missile in the South China Sea in August 2020. A known source has revealed. High-ranking US military officials also acknowledge this fact. There are multiple testimonies that two missiles, also known as "aircraft carrier killer," hit the ship, which poses a threat to the US military deploying aircraft carriers around China.


 The launch test was conducted on August 26, in the waters between Hainan Province and the Paracel Islands. According to people familiar with the matter, one "Dongfeng (DF) 26B" (range: about 4000 km) was launched first from Qinghai Province in the inland area, targeting an old merchant ship that had been automatically navigated unmanned. A few minutes later, one "DF21D" (with a range of over 1500 km) was launched from Zhejiang Province in the east. The two missiles "struck the ship almost at the same time and sank."

 Another source testified that two missiles had hit a merchant ship, and said that it "showed off the Chinese missile capabilities" to US military reconnaissance aircraft and Aegis ships deployed around the sea area. It is believed that this is the first time that the Chinese military has conducted a launch experiment on a moving target in the South China Sea. It shows that the surveillance system such as reconnaissance satellites that capture the position of the ship and the accuracy of missiles are steadily improving.

 In late November, US Indo-Pacific Commander Philip Davidson admitted in a public security forum held online that "Chinese troops have tested anti-ship ballistic missiles at moving targets." He didn't say whether he actually hit the ship.
 
. . . .
Nothing special
The US develops missiles that can hit Xi when he drives his car in Beijing downtown.
My friend do you understand missile technology at all? We have cruise missile and ballistic missiles and also hypersonic missiles, just like the US but a ballistic missile sinking a moving ship, that's a FIRST ON EARTH.even your Papa doesn't have this tech. The hard part is targrttting and maneuverable war heads.
 
. .
My friend do you understand missile technology at all? We have cruise missile and ballistic missiles and also hypersonic missiles, just like the US but a ballistic missile sinking a moving ship, that's a FIRST ON EARTH.even your Papa doesn't have this tech. The hard part is targrttting and maneuverable war heads.
Assume you can hit US carriers by ballistic missiles, what do you think how will the US respond? Once you fire ballistic missiles you lose the war.
How can the US military know if you arm the ballistic missiles with conventional or nuclear warheads?
The moment you fire from the mainland, China will be bombarded by ballistic missiles.
Xi Jingping has 10 minutes to decide if he launches all missiles towards America.
Maybe you are right.
China is overpopulated.
 
Last edited:
.
Assume you can hit US carriers by ballistic missiles, what do you think how will the US respond? Once you fire ballistic missiles you lose the war.
How can the US military know if you arm the ballistic missiles with conventional or nuclear warheads?
The moment you fire from the mainland, China will be bombarded by ballistic missiles.
Xi Jingping has 10 minutes to decide if he launches all missiles towards America.
Maybe you are right.
China is overpopulated.
We already declared our policy of no first use, if the US fire nukes, we will retaliate and the Russians will too and then it will be the end of the world, understand? Your Papa is not as stronk as you think.
 
.
Assume you can hit US carriers by ballistic missiles, what do you think how will the US respond? Once you fire ballistic missiles you lose the war.
How can the US military know if you arm the ballistic missiles with conventional or nuclear warheads?
The moment you fire from the mainland, China will be bombarded by ballistic missiles.
Xi Jingping has 10 minutes to decide if he launches all missiles towards America.
Maybe you are right.
China is overpopulated.
Just like Vietnam lost the war?
 
.
We already declared our policy of no first use, if the US fire nukes, we will retaliate and the Russians will too and then it will be the end of the world, understand? Your Papa is not as stronk as you think.
Ok I know you declare no first use. The question is can we trust your words? I mean you declare peaceful rise too. You declare many things.
Ballistic missile is a game with fire. You can fire cruise missiles, you can fire every super duper missile you want, however the moment you fire ballistic then that’s like playing Russian roulette. You don’t know how your opponent responds.
 
.
Nothing special
“Nothing special” from a Vietnam member when your defense industry is currently at this level.

national defence winner project :85mm tank shell with 130RHA peneration at 1000m, sorry to say, you can't even penetrate WW2 Tiger tank with this.
88r2qp29738442s8n4n0315sq5517sr4.jpg


putting a yankees cold war howitzer on a soviet truck and called it indigenous.

下载 (3).jpg
297_253191_899157.jpg
 
.
Ok I know you declare no first use. The question is can we trust your words? I mean you declare peaceful rise too. You declare many things.
Ballistic missile is a game with fire. You can fire cruise missiles, you can fire every super duper missile you want, however the moment you fire ballistic then that’s like playing Russian roulette. You don’t know how your opponent responds.
That's for US to find out if its nuclear, we already told them, they want to start a nuke war then too bad but u doubt they will start armageddon over one carrier and we wont shoot their carrier unless they violate get into Taiwan crisis or start a war in Nansha area, they have a choice and they know the risks. We are peaceful, you see us invading anyone? Did we fight any war since 1980s?
 
.
“Nothing special” from a Vietnam member when your defense industry is currently at this level.

national defence winner project :85mm tank shell with 130RHA peneration at 1000m, sorry to say, you can't even penetrate WW2 Tiger tank with this.
View attachment 707085

putting a yankees cold war howitzer on a soviet truck and called it indigenous.

View attachment 707083View attachment 707084
Cannot destroy tigers?
Ok small calibre just 85mm, however those shells are hardened with tungsten core.

Pháo tự hành nâng cấp Made in Vietnam thể hiện uy lực dũng mãnh trong nhiệm vụ đặc biệt - Ảnh 1.

Pháo tự hành nâng cấp Made in Vietnam thể hiện uy lực dũng mãnh trong nhiệm vụ đặc biệt - Ảnh 2.
 
.
Damn, no one remembers this thread is for anti-ship ballistic missile, some coolest war system that human being have today. Not a thread for some WW2 gun!
 
.
US tech sucks. I had a Chinese tablet that died after battery went to zero only a few times. I took out the battery and was surprised it's an American company manufacturing in China. I replaced it with genuine Chinese battery, made the battery go to zero more than 20 times now, still charging up just fine.

If America can't even produce lithium polymer batteries properly, imagine all the crap their military is getting...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom