What's new

Japanese Infrastructure Deal with Bangladesh May Disrupt “Belt and Road” Initiative

EastBengalPro

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
690
Reaction score
0
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
Background

On 29 June, the Japan International Co-operation Agency (JICA) and the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh signed a loan agreement to provide official development assistance (ODA) loans of up to 178.225 billion yen (approximately $2.05 billion) to fund six major infrastructure projects. Bangladesh is one of the world’s fastest growing economies, accelerating at an average pace of six per cent per annum due to the development of its garment industries. As such, the country has attracted significant international attention due to its potential market, large work force and competitive labour costs. Bangladesh also holds considerable geopolitical importance due to its proximity to both India and the sea lanes of the Indian Ocean. Consequently, Bangladesh has become something of a global staging ground of competing strategic interests, the most significant issue being the growing influence of China in the region. As a result, Bangladesh is balancing not only the interests of Japan, but also those of India, China and the United States.

Comment

In its Seventh Five Year Plan (2016-2020), the Bangladeshi Government officially set the goal of becoming a middle income country by 2021. In addition to the loans funding the Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport Expansion project, the Kanchpur, Meghna and Gumti Second Bridges construction project, the Dhaka Mass Rapid Transit development project, the Dhaka Underground Substation Construction project, the Small Scale Water Resources development project and the Matarbari Ultra Super Critical Coal-Fired Power project, JICA has stated that it will continue to support Bangladesh in its efforts to further economic growth and overcome domestic social challenges.

JICA has also made interesting advancements in key infrastructure projects in India’s north-east, given Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s commitment to his “Act East” policy, and his assertions regarding the importance of its north-eastern states in the country’s strategic outreach towards South-East Asia. In April, JICA and the Union Government in New Delhi signed a loan agreement for the provision of 67 billion yen ($771.9 million) to fund Phase I of the North-East Road Network Connectivity Improvement project. Phase I will upgrade the existing National Highways 54 and 51 in Mizoram and Meghalaya, which will not only enhance transportation links between the north-eastern states and the rest of India, but will also play a significant role in linking India with Bangladesh.

The project complements the Indo-Pacific Economic Corridor linking South and South-East Asia, an initiative revived by the Trump Administration in the United States, and to some extent intended to potentially counter China’s ambitious “Belt and Road” initiative. The initiative is the formalisation of Beijing’s strategy for bolstering its commercial trade routes, and Dhaka is a crucial participant as well as a key link in China’s Maritime Silk Road strategy. Announced as a commercial exercise, China has been establishing a network of ports extending from its own coastline through the Indian Ocean, South-East Asia, East Africa and the Mediterranean. This activity has been cause for concern among many in South Asia states who perceive this so-called “String of Pearls” strategy to have potentially militaristic implications for the region.

Indeed, China faced a severe setback in February last year when Bangladesh shelved bilateral plans for the construction of a deep-sea port at Sonadia. Beijing intended to design and operate the port that would have been an important transhipment hub for the Maritime Silk Road as well as easing China’s dependence on the potentially vulnerable Strait of Malacca chokepoint.

As a country reliant on seaborne trade, a China-financed deep-sea port would have been extremely beneficial, but Dhaka shelved the plans in response to a Japanese proposalwhich, along with a deep-sea port, included provision of four coal fired power plants in Chittagong in 2014. Regional geopolitics also undoubtedly contributed to the decision. The US, India and Japan are all wary of China’s increasing presence in the Indian Ocean region and likely to have exerted some pressure on Bangladesh to cancel the Sonadia plans. Indeed, India gave significant support to the Awami League government during the 2014 Bangladesh elections, and the US is Bangladesh’s largest market for its textiles industry, as well as its largest source of foreign exchange earnings.

China is still likely to seek influence in Bangladesh, particularly through investments and participation in infrastructure projects, as the ever-growing importance of the Indian Ocean sea routes makes it imperative that China develop close ties with the Bay of Bengal littoral states, particularly Bangladesh. It can, however, expect its plans to be contested by other powers – Japan, India and the US – that are aiming to further their own strategic interests in Bangladesh.

http://www.futuredirections.org.au/...-bangladesh-may-disrupt-belt-road-initiative/
 
. .
Actually people don't know but India-Japan nexus is already countering China B&R initiative. Japan agreed for a trillion yen of investments for India within 5yrs to support India's Act east policy which will link north-east with Bangladesh & Myanmar then linking to countries like Vietnam, Thailand etc. Some major projects like BBIN, MIEC, IMT trilateral highway are under way so basically Bangladesh & Myanmar are in middle of India & Japan's interests.
 
.
Background

On 29 June, the Japan International Co-operation Agency (JICA) and the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh signed a loan agreement to provide official development assistance (ODA) loans of up to 178.225 billion yen (approximately $2.05 billion) to fund six major infrastructure projects. Bangladesh is one of the world’s fastest growing economies, accelerating at an average pace of six per cent per annum due to the development of its garment industries. As such, the country has attracted significant international attention due to its potential market, large work force and competitive labour costs. Bangladesh also holds considerable geopolitical importance due to its proximity to both India and the sea lanes of the Indian Ocean. Consequently, Bangladesh has become something of a global staging ground of competing strategic interests, the most significant issue being the growing influence of China in the region. As a result, Bangladesh is balancing not only the interests of Japan, but also those of India, China and the United States.

Comment

In its Seventh Five Year Plan (2016-2020), the Bangladeshi Government officially set the goal of becoming a middle income country by 2021. In addition to the loans funding the Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport Expansion project, the Kanchpur, Meghna and Gumti Second Bridges construction project, the Dhaka Mass Rapid Transit development project, the Dhaka Underground Substation Construction project, the Small Scale Water Resources development project and the Matarbari Ultra Super Critical Coal-Fired Power project, JICA has stated that it will continue to support Bangladesh in its efforts to further economic growth and overcome domestic social challenges.

JICA has also made interesting advancements in key infrastructure projects in India’s north-east, given Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s commitment to his “Act East” policy, and his assertions regarding the importance of its north-eastern states in the country’s strategic outreach towards South-East Asia. In April, JICA and the Union Government in New Delhi signed a loan agreement for the provision of 67 billion yen ($771.9 million) to fund Phase I of the North-East Road Network Connectivity Improvement project. Phase I will upgrade the existing National Highways 54 and 51 in Mizoram and Meghalaya, which will not only enhance transportation links between the north-eastern states and the rest of India, but will also play a significant role in linking India with Bangladesh.

The project complements the Indo-Pacific Economic Corridor linking South and South-East Asia, an initiative revived by the Trump Administration in the United States, and to some extent intended to potentially counter China’s ambitious “Belt and Road” initiative. The initiative is the formalisation of Beijing’s strategy for bolstering its commercial trade routes, and Dhaka is a crucial participant as well as a key link in China’s Maritime Silk Road strategy. Announced as a commercial exercise, China has been establishing a network of ports extending from its own coastline through the Indian Ocean, South-East Asia, East Africa and the Mediterranean. This activity has been cause for concern among many in South Asia states who perceive this so-called “String of Pearls” strategy to have potentially militaristic implications for the region.

Indeed, China faced a severe setback in February last year when Bangladesh shelved bilateral plans for the construction of a deep-sea port at Sonadia. Beijing intended to design and operate the port that would have been an important transhipment hub for the Maritime Silk Road as well as easing China’s dependence on the potentially vulnerable Strait of Malacca chokepoint.

As a country reliant on seaborne trade, a China-financed deep-sea port would have been extremely beneficial, but Dhaka shelved the plans in response to a Japanese proposalwhich, along with a deep-sea port, included provision of four coal fired power plants in Chittagong in 2014. Regional geopolitics also undoubtedly contributed to the decision. The US, India and Japan are all wary of China’s increasing presence in the Indian Ocean region and likely to have exerted some pressure on Bangladesh to cancel the Sonadia plans. Indeed, India gave significant support to the Awami League government during the 2014 Bangladesh elections, and the US is Bangladesh’s largest market for its textiles industry, as well as its largest source of foreign exchange earnings.

China is still likely to seek influence in Bangladesh, particularly through investments and participation in infrastructure projects, as the ever-growing importance of the Indian Ocean sea routes makes it imperative that China develop close ties with the Bay of Bengal littoral states, particularly Bangladesh. It can, however, expect its plans to be contested by other powers – Japan, India and the US – that are aiming to further their own strategic interests in Bangladesh.

http://www.futuredirections.org.au/...-bangladesh-may-disrupt-belt-road-initiative/

I do not want to be rude to Bangladeshi posters. Other than access to a potential lucrative market of 200 million people in Bangladesh there is nothing strategic about Bangladesh. Myanmar has no interest in connectivity with Bangladesh. India-Bangladesh connectivity is something India and Bangladesh do bilaterally. You can rest assured India will not involve China in bilateral India-Bangladesh issues.

All the hoopla about OBOR is about China's desire to own vital infrastructure in other countries.
If China wants to ship goods to Europe Russia has the railway lines to ship things to Europe. It already exists.
 
. . . .
I do not want to be rude to Bangladeshi posters. Other than access to a potential lucrative market of 200 million people in Bangladesh there is nothing strategic about Bangladesh.
What strategic thing you are talking about? Can you explain a bit? Every east-west transportation corridor(road and railway) model which connect south-east Asia with that of south and west Asia even Europe passes through Bangladesh.It have to be with no other viable alternative.You should try to convince other Asian countries to go through Siliguri corridor or farther north traversing the Himalayan mountain range and see the success.
Myanmar has no interest in connectivity with Bangladesh.
Myanmar had no interest in connectivity with any country in the world.They were a hermit kingdom much of their existence.Only in the last 3-4 years, they are integrating with their neighbor in the ASEAN. So, they are not a bench mark of anything.
India-Bangladesh connectivity is something India and Bangladesh do bilaterally.
We see Bangladesh-India connectivity as a small part of wider connectivity across Asia and Europe.
You can rest assured India will not involve China in bilateral India-Bangladesh issues.
OK,Neither will Bangladesh.And you can be lest assured that, Neither China or Bangladesh will involve India in China-Bangladesh bilateral issues.
All the hoopla about OBOR is about China's desire to own vital infrastructure in other countries.
If China wants to ship goods to Europe Russia has the railway lines to ship things to Europe. It already exists.
China is not short-sighted like you Indian.China knows very well, in near future Asian market will become so large that it will dwarf European market by many times. Europe is only a part of their entire scheme, not the whole scheme.China give much more importance to the resources of Middle east and central Asia as well as as trade and investment with South and South East Asia.That's the reason for OBOR initiative, to connect all the partners of China with herself and do business easily.
 
Last edited:
.
With all the normal powers of the world fighting wars to invest in hyperpower Bangladesh, its time BD stops begging LDC status to get some peanuts worth of tax free markets. Its time it demands most developed country status and I hope BD provides tax free to LDC countries like India, Japan etc :(
 
.
I do not want to be rude to Bangladeshi posters. Other than access to a potential lucrative market of 200 million people in Bangladesh there is nothing strategic about Bangladesh. Myanmar has no interest in connectivity with Bangladesh.
You have never seen a map of the region, perhaps, specially that of your chicken neck between BD and Bhutan. How India can build a connectivity with Myanmar and its east without going through BD? Even your govt is pleading BD for allowing connectivity between Meghalaya and west Bengal. Your Chicken Neck is seen on the map, but in reality it is a rough mountain terrain. Do you think, all other countries east of BD will jump on Indian lap if India insists on a virtually non-existent Chicken Neck? Stupid Indian jerk!!
 
.
If BD plays this well they can get good deals from all the major powers in the region without selling their sovereignty to any one of them.

Japan has been a silent but big development partner of countries in the region for decades. I am waiting for the day on PDF when some of these China cheerleaders start bad mouthing Japan too.
 
.
You have never seen a map of the region, perhaps, specially that of your chicken neck between BD and Bhutan. How India can build a connectivity with Myanmar and its east without going through BD? Even your govt is pleading BD for allowing connectivity between Meghalaya and west Bengal. Your Chicken Neck is seen on the map, but in reality it is a rough mountain terrain. Do you think, all other countries east of BD will jump on Indian lap if India insists on a virtually non-existent Chicken Neck? Stupid Indian jerk!!

Who are we going to trade after building the road ? civil war ravaged Myanmar ? Until Myanmar stabilizes BIMSTEC is going nowhere.

It is much easier to build a road through the Chicken Neck than to build across the Himalayas

What strategic thing you are talking about? Can you explain a bit? Every east-west transportation corridor(road and railway) model which connect south-east Asia with that of south and west Asia even Europe passes through Bangladesh.It have to be with no other viable alternative.You should try to convince other Asian countries to go through Siliguri corridor or farther north traversing the Himalayan mountain range and see the success.

Myanmar had no interest in connectivity with any country in the world.They were a hermit kingdom much of their existence.Only in the last 3-4 years, they are integrating with their neighbor in the ASEAN. So, they are not a bench mark of anything.

China is not short-sighted like you Indian.China knows very well, in near future Asian market will become so large that it will dwarf European market by many times. Europe is only a part of their entire scheme, not the whole scheme. China give much more importance to the resources of Middle east and central Asia as well as as trade and investment with South and South East Asia.That's the reason for OBOR initiative, to connect all the partners of China with herself and do business easily.
@wanglaokan @dy1022 @Beast @Jlaw @Khan saheb @Species @Comillaboy

Why should South East Asia be connected by rail to South Asia and West Asia ? You make it sound like it is a good project. You are at the mercy of everything country in the region. which fool wants to sign up for that ?
If Myanmar does not participate it ends the whole concept. You can bypass Bangladesh via Siliguri corridor. It is expensive to bypass India. It is impossible to bypass Iran.

China does not need OBOR to connect to other countries. They already have links with some Central Asian states and South East Asian states. It is a fig leaf to conceal the takeover of infrastructure in poor countries.
 
. . .
Why should South East Asia be connected by rail to South Asia and West Asia ? You make it sound like it is a good project.
So, it is a bad project? May I know why?
You are at the mercy of everything country in the region. which fool wants to sign up for that ?
What are you trying to say here? Not clear at all.
If Myanmar does not participate it ends the whole concept. You can bypass Bangladesh via Siliguri corridor. It is expensive to bypass India. It is impossible to bypass Iran.
Yeah, siliguri corridor is the global super highway.

Yes, Myanmar is important,so are Iran.If these two country don't join than any possible transportation have to traverse eastern Himalayas and Caucasus mountain.Which will defeat the purpose.Just like traversing dense, mountainous Naga hills and siliguri corridor will defeat the purpose.
if it is India taking over you will hearing screams and drama
I guess it is okay with china
So road and railway connectivity is bad because of China? Now it is clear, why are you harping about strategic position of Bangladesh and reluctance of Myanmar.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom