Immanuel
FULL MEMBER

- Joined
- May 3, 2013
- Messages
- 367
- Reaction score
- -19
- Country
- Location

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
US should have developed YF-23 as an export product for its tier-1 allies.
Err..yes.Every single indentation,every minor edge accounts for a increase of RCS in a aircraft.This difference is often ignored in <5th gen aircrafts owing to its already sizeable RCS and aerodynamic advantages offered by canards and LERX.But in 5th gen,stealth is made by a compromise in manuverability.Err no - J-20 is more stealthy.
When in level flight at far off ranges the canards will hardly move and so stealth will not be affected.
No matter how much you upgrade the F-35 it's airframe and single engine limitation will remain.
Hence my statement that J20 enjoys advantage in payload.J20 has a larger and deeper weapon bay. Which not only means more payload but also more weapon systems can be chosen to utilize. Like ASM etc
when US started the F35 project, they never dreamed of the existence of J20, it is a misconcepted product at the begging. now they have to resort to hard bragging to convince their partners that it is a good fighter.
On the contray, tthe development of J20 begin with the purpose of target f22, it will shoot down f35 like flies.
the problem with f35 is that it want to put all funtions of diferent aircrats into one plane, this is a arrogant concpet. when J20 show up, it approved to be stupid cause it could not excel in any of its funtions. a white elephant at the most.That is why Japan is developing it's own 5th gen fighter as it knows that the F-35 is no match
for J-20 or J-31.
the problem with f35 is that it want to put all funtions of diferent aircrats into one plane, this is a arrogant concpet. when J20 show up, it approved to be stupid cause it could not excel in any of its funtions. a white elephant at the most.
the problem with f35 is that it want to put all funtions of diferent aircrats into one plane, this is a arrogant concpet. when J20 show up, it approved to be stupid cause it could not excel in any of its funtions. a white elephant at the most.
Then every jet that became multi-missions multi-roles are wrong ?the problem with f35 is that it want to put all funtions of diferent aircrats into one plane, this is a arrogant concpet. when J20 show up, it approved to be stupid cause it could not excel in any of its funtions. a white elephant at the most.
No way. I agree with what saishkumar said.
It's all about money allocation.
Northrop won the B2 contract so they basically could not win the YF23 contract.
It's pretty clear they will have their hands in the 6th gen stuff.
(But it might be just a new bomber)
Got any hard data to support your assertion ?Err no - J-20 is more stealthy.
When in level flight at far off ranges the canards will hardly move and so stealth will not be affected.
No matter how much you upgrade the F-35 it's airframe and single engine limitation will remain.
Got any hard data to support your assertion ?
But if you want to go that way, then I say that when Lightnings strikes, the J-20 pilots will not know what hit them. The US have defeated 'stealth', pal. Those flippity-floppity canards are going to give the J-20 away as if the Chinese pilots fly beacons.
F-35 has compromised stealth, manoeuvrability and low top-speed - a "jack-of-all trades and master of none" aircraft so to speak.
It was never designed as an air-superiority fighter and so would nearly always lose in air-combat against dedicated air-superiority 5th generation fighters like J-20.
The fact is J-20 is still years away from bieng inducted