What's new

Israeli Attack on Syrian Capital Damascus

At least under Ahmadinejad, there were more balls. Hezbollah was unconstrained to retaliate and humiliate the israelis.
Now Iran under Rohani has been a major ballsucker of the west, and does nothing to respond to the repeated israeli aggressions.

@Falcon29

Really? I never knew about that.

Illegal attack you may call it but bound to occur also

Bound to occur because you said so? No, it's illegal and unacceptable. No single country on earth attacks neighbors defense systems.

Its time for Syria to get real reclaim lost territory and stop buying weapons to invade Turkey/Israel.

They have no intention of attacking any neighboring nation. The weapons are for defensive purposes. But, if you believe such defense systems permit nations to attack others than the first country you should attack is Israel. Which has Iron Dome, Patrioit(American), Sling, Arrow 2(American) which permit it to mercilessy attack defenseless people as such systems regulate retailation of those attacked useless.
 
.
Really? I never knew about that.

Rohani and Javad Zarif (foreign minister) are known in Iran to be major sellouts that bends over for the west. Did you know they were the negotiating team in 2003, where they agreed to stop Iran's enrichment and nuclear advancement for 2 years?
It wasnt until Ahmadinejad that Iran rapidly advanced its nuclear infrastructure, and showed some fecking balls in the region.

They are probably going to sell out again. Rumor has it that the US has even put missile development on the table, where Iran is not to develop missiles beyond 150 km range.
These ballsuckers are probably gonna agree to the demands.
 
.
Really? I never knew about that.



Bound to occur because you said so? No, it's illegal and unacceptable. No single country on earth attacks neighbors defense systems.



They have no intention of attacking any neighboring nation. The weapons are for defensive purposes. But, if you believe such defense systems permit nations to attack others than the first country you should attack is Israel. Which has Iron Dome, Patrioit(American), Sling, Arrow 2(American) which permit it to mercilessy attack defenseless people as such systems regulate retailation of those attacked useless.

If Syria purchases 100 T-90 tanks from Russia i don't think Israel would launch an airstrike.

But buying a strategic SAM/BMD/CMD system has geopolitical implications.

Israel has a much higher and powerfull status. It won't go batshit crazy and nuke people over religious reasons unlike some people i dare mention
 
.
Supplies for Hezbollah? Air attacks on Hezbollah supplies were legitimized - even encouraged - under UNSCR 1701, clause 15, with no need to regard another nation's sovereignty. Look it up, people!
 
.
If Syria purchases 100 T-90 tanks from Russia i don't think Israel would launch an airstrike.

But buying a strategic SAM/BMD/CMD system has geopolitical implications.

I don't care if you believe buying defensive systems have geopolitical implications. It's still illegal. Secondly, what about when Israel acquires so many explosives in munitions or more defense systems/offensive weapons systems. Would you accept any 'geopolitical implications' for that?

It won't go batshit crazy and nuke people over religious reasons unlike some people i dare mention

Never heard of such people.
 
.
Look who is talking. Person whos country bombed, starved to death and gassed 200,000 people
Tell that ridiculous lies to someone stupid enough to fall for it.

Once again, you realize Hezbollah has no naval, Air Force, armor capabilities. S-300 is only used by nations with Air Force or national military to deploy out in the open. You can't deploy S-300 as an militia. It will be targeted, Hezbollah doesn't know how to operate such systems and they are very large. They can't conceal them in Lebanon.

So you too have fallen for Israel's bs claims that it has targeted Hezbollah's S-300s? It's a very stupid lie. As Hitler says, the bigger the lie, the easier people fall for it.

Almost every single act of aggression by Israel against sovereign nations comes with excuse that they have bombed Hezbollah, Hamas etc super-duper weapons.

Hezbollah doesn't need any air defense system, they have what they should have right now, in a future war, you'll see it in good use over Tel Aviv, Haifa and other areas, then you will understand that S-300 is useless in guerrilla warfare, which again is a lie by Israeli propaganda machine.
 
Last edited:
.
I don't care if you believe buying defensive systems have geopolitical implications. It's still illegal. Secondly, what about when Israel acquires so many explosives in munitions or more defense systems/offensive weapons systems. Would you accept any 'geopolitical implications' for that?



Never heard of such people.

Israel is more responsible than any neighbour.

When Hamas launched missiles towards Dimona a fair response would have been levelling out half of west bank under pretext of preventing nuclear disaster.

But they did not do anything even remotely similar.

Its illegal alright but hey its the middle east. You have a daily genocide and what not. Syria can buy tactical Air Defence systems. But S-300 deployed in Damascus can take down IDF jets anywhere maybe even Eilat so pre-emptive strikes. If those jets were taken down the Samson option would come into play. Avoiding the end of the world is not so bad

Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Nusra being some examples.
 
.
This is like the 5th israeli attack since the civil war started, this one in the capital. Air defense is none existent.
 
.
So you too have fallen for Israel's bs claims that it has targeted Hezbollah's S-300s? It's a very stupid lie. As Hitler says, the bigger the lie, the easier people fall for it.

.

How did you get that impression? When I'm arguing opposite of that? You realize I already dispelled lie that missile system is intended for Hezbollah in previous posts...

When Hamas launched missiles towards Dimona a fair response would have been levelling out half of west bank under pretext of preventing nuclear disaster.

.

Reported for being suicide troll.

@ResurgentIran

This is Palmach, he is back again.

.......

But I agree, level illegal Jewish half of West Bank. :D :)
 
.
Israel is more responsible than any neighbour.

When Hamas launched missiles towards Dimona a fair response would have been levelling out half of west bank under pretext of preventing nuclear disaster.

But they did not do anything even remotely similar.

Its illegal alright but hey its the middle east. You have a daily genocide and what not. Syria can buy tactical Air Defence systems. But S-300 deployed in Damascus can take down IDF jets anywhere maybe even Eilat so pre-emptive strikes. If those jets were taken down the Samson option would come into play. Avoiding the end of the world is not so bad

Hamas, Hezbollah, Al-Nusra being some examples.
Is Al Nusrah the same with Hezbollah and Hamas????!
 
.
How did you get that impression? When I'm arguing opposite of that? You realize I already dispelled lie that missile system is intended for Hezbollah in previous posts...



Reported for being suicide troll.

@ResurgentIran

This is Palmach, he is back again.

.......

But I agree, level illegal Jewish half of West Bank. :D :)

Sorry mixed gaza up with west bank.

Rest of your answer does not merit a response

Is Al Nusrah the same with Hezbollah and Hamas????!

Much worse but getting a chance to nuke Israel is not something any of them will pass up.
 
. .
Tell that ridiculous lies to someone stupid enough to fall for it.
Let me refresh your memory:

UMLACA.jpg


967347-un-inspectors-syria.jpg


I bet according to Press TV rebels stole Volcano rockets and gassed themselves. I guess they also barrel bomb themselves daily.
 
.
WTF, indians are not bashing israel for attacking assad?

Why, why are you not talking against israel?

And didn't iran told the world attacking syria is attacking us?
 
.
why the hell Israel conduct this Air-strike ?? doesnt make any sense ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom