Falcon29
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 31,647
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
It really depends on which side of the border the IDF was, doesn't it?
If they are "approaching", then that indicates that they are still on the Israeli side,
in which case the airstrike is really to be expected and no laws really broken by Israel,
Only by the killed Palestinians.
Shooting the judge, was in self-defense, since the judge tried to grab a weapon,
according to Israeli sources. This may be, or may not be correct.
As for shooting the alledged stone thrower, some Israelis believe
that the soldier is stepping beyond the limit, and is calling for an
investigation, which might end with up in a court.
Only proper investigation of the other two cases will show which side is correct.
Gut reaction to always put blame on the other side is not helpful.
Take Israel's word for it, the same nation that attacked and murdered 34 American sailors and claimed it was a mistake. Obviously you're a Zionist stooge idiot who takes Israel's word for everything.
Both Palestinians killed in the West Bank were in Palestinian land killed by Israeli forces stationed at an illegal settlement outpost.
Israel committed an incursion into Gaza, so no it's not justified at all either way you terrorists will justify every murder of every single Palestinian ever killed by Israel.
Perhaps the iranian-funded internationally proscribed terrorist group should not have been firing mortars into Israel.
Good riddance.
Shut your mouth idiot, no one buys your games here if you haven't noticed. Palestinians were defending their side of the border and didn't fire a mortar into Israel. They fired a mortar at Israeli invading forces. Get your terrorist garbage out of here only Zionist Jews and Christians buy your lame diversions. Doesn't matter who they're funded by.