What's new

Israel is Capable of Taking Out S-300 and S-400, But Won't Do This – Publicist

Lincoln

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 2, 2018
Messages
5,852
Reaction score
20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Turkey
08:12 17.11.2018
Ekaterina Blinova
The deployment of the Russian-made S-300 in Syria has not brought an end to Israeli military operations in the region, Israeli publicist Avigdor Eskin has told Sputnik.

"Israel is capable of overcoming both S-300 and S-400," Israeli publicist and political commentator Avigdor Eskin told Sputnik. "As a matter of fact, the Israeli Air Force (IAF) did it successfully several times in Syria."

Regardless of this, Israel does not have any intention to spoil its working relations with Moscow, the political commentator underscored.

"The issue is rather political and not military," Eskin explained. "Israel does not want to harm positive and constructive relations with Russia. We do not want to demonstrate our far advanced superiority over Russian air forces. We have no intentions of controlling Syria and therefore we will always look for friendly compromise with the Russians."



1069787456.jpg

© PHOTO: RUSSIAN DEFENCE MINISTRY
Israel Allegedly Trained to Take Out S-300 During Drills With Greece
In October, Moscow delivered the S-300 system to Syria following the accidental downing of the Russian Il-20 surveillance plane by Syrian forces in September 2018. The incident was blamed on the IAF which was conducting military operations in the Syrian airspace at the time of tragedy. Tel Aviv vehemently denied the accusations.


Eskin's comment comes in response to reports of Israel's alleged training to take out the Russian-made S-300 long range surface-to-air missile systems during its latest drills in Greece.

It is not the first time that media have reported about the IAF's tests apparently aimed at finding ways to overcome Russia's advanced missile systems.

On December 4, 2015 Reuters wrote, citing unnamed military and diplomatic sources that "Israel… quietly tested ways of defeating an advanced air-defence system that Russia has deployed in the Middle East and that could limit Israel's ability to strike in Syria or Iran," during its military exercises with Greece.

The media outlet specified that to that end Greece and Israel, who had "experienced a boom in [bilateral] ties" since 2010, used the Russian S-300 system that was sold to Cyprus in 1997 and then, under the pressure from NATO, moved to the Greek island of Crete in 2007.

The Greek and Israeli militaries neither confirmed nor denied whether they used the S-300 system during drills held in the Eastern Mediterranean in 2014, 2012 or 2010.

Israel is 'Satisfied with What Russia is Doing in Syria'

When asked whether Israel is seeking to undermine Moscow's military activity in the Middle East in general and Syria in particular, Eskin noted that Tel Aviv is "satisfied with what Russians are doing in Syria."

"The whole outcome of this war for us is a great victory of Israel," he said. "As you know, Syria has never terminated the status of war de jure vis-à-vis Israel."



1069821414.jpg

© SPUTNIK/ PAVEL LISITSYN
Israeli Satellite Company Claims S-300 in Syria 'Not Yet Operational' (PHOTO)

Syria and Israel have technically been at a state of war since the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. Damascus still continues to be part of the Arab League boycott of Israel.


"Whereas their army was estimated in 2011 as being over three hundred thousand soldiers, today it is around twenty five thousand," the publicist remarked. "And there is no military presence of Israel in Syria. So we have nothing to complaint about."

The question then arises whether Israel will resort to direct strikes against Syria's S-300 to disable it.

"Never say never," Eskin said. "But there is no need to do this. We will not hit any targets, which are under the auspices of President Assad and his loyal forces. There is no foreseeable reason to do this."

Israeli Ops in Syria



1052457517.jpg

© PHOTO: RUSSIAN DEFENSE MINISTRY
Israeli Publicist Explains Why Tel Aviv Remains 'Cool' Over Syria's S-300

In October, then Israeli defence minister, Avigdor Lieberman signalled that Israel would continue to conduct air operations against Hezbollah and Iran in the Syrian airspace despite the S-300 deployment.


Answering the question whether the IAF still continues its air raids in Syria, Eskin said that "Israel has never stopped the necessary operations in Syria against those who threaten our existence."

"The only difference is that we will try harder to prevent unnecessary publications," he opined. "I also believe that it will go down soon dramatically, because Iran will not be able to finance these operations abroad."

However, Al-Masdar News reported, citing an unnamed military source in Damascus, that the IAF had not carried out any operations in Syria since Russia delivered the S-300 system to the Syrian Arab Army in early October.

The views and opinions expressed by the contributors do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

https://sputniknews.com/amp/analysis/201811171069879497-israel-syria-s300/

So, seems there are holes in thr defense mechanisms of S-300 and S-400 which can be made us of via practice?
 
. .
If they attack S-300 / S-400 their planes get shot down by Su-35. Yes. Russia got Su-35 in Syria. Bring it on punks.

Israel ain't the only country in the region that has fighter jets. Other countries have fighter jets too.

 
.
With the exception of Turkey, there is no country in that part of the world that can stand up to Israel's airforce. And, most certainly not the Russians with their limited deployed footprint.

The S300 and S400 are not invincible. Israel has had plenty of time to see how the S300 operates through Greece, and I do think they can take it out with the drop of a hat. With its active use in Syria i am sure most of the western countries have worked out how to jam it, and then give it a good kicking.

We can do the same, with our relationship with China. And, while China doesn't have the long range missiles that the Indians may get, that wont stop PAF from understanding how the radar works, and the underlying battlefield management systems work and how to counter them.

Most Russian systems are over-hyped, when it comes to real world performance, they can never match their paper specifications, and that applies to the S300/400 series aswell.
 
Last edited:
. .
If they attack S-300 / S-400 their planes get shot down by Su-35. Yes. Russia got Su-35 in Syria. Bring it on punks.

Israel ain't the only country in the region that has fighter jets. Other countries have fighter jets too.


what about F35 Israel started to receive ?

To knock down any SAM system is to send over him drone with true signature of real platforme of F15/ F16 in case of Israel and (Israel is very capable to make such drones) all S300 or S400 will be seen depleting in no more than minutes all their stocks of missiles. and then it will be open bar.
 
. .
If they attack S-300 / S-400 their planes get shot down by Su-35. Yes. Russia got Su-35 in Syria. Bring it on punks.

Israel ain't the only country in the region that has fighter jets. Other countries have fighter jets too.


They haven't stopped one yet though, we have only been seeing Russia making a few words here and there, and the other continuing to make use of its tactics.

The bigger question here though is, and of more relevancy, what are the tactics the IAF employs to counter the S300s and the S400s, rather than whether or not Russia can actually respond, because my interest is rather in whether or not the defense system is penetrable, and if so, then how.
 
. . .
And don't mess with AESA equipped F-15/F-18/F-35/F-22 @undertakerwwefan :p:p:;):enjoy:

Americans never dared fight Russians and never will. Sweden fought Russia. France fought Russia. Britain fought Russia. Japan fought Russia. China fought Russia. Italy fought Russia. Turkey fought Russia. Germany fought Russia. Americans are cowards. Even if Americans have F-22 and Russia have LaGG-3 American still don't dare fight Russia. Cowards.
 
.
Americans never dared fight Russians and never will. Sweden fought Russia. France fought Russia. Britain fought Russia. Japan fought Russia. China fought Russia. Italy fought Russia. Turkey fought Russia. Germany fought Russia. Americans are cowards. Even if Americans have F-22 and Russia have LaGG-3 American still don't dare fight Russia. Cowards.
Same goes to Russian, Russian will never dare to fight with Americans @undertakerwwefan :p:;):p:enjoy: , and don't repeat your this crap again @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
Same goes to Russian, Russian will never dare to fight with Americans @undertakerwwefan :p:;):p:enjoy: , and don't repeat your this crap again @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

So what? You are a pro America Pakistani. I'm a pro Russia Chinese. We are not White people. White people do not respect non Whites. We Chinese have J-20. We make everything ourselves. We don't depend on White people. Can't say the same about Pakistan.
 
.
So what? You are a pro America Pakistani. I'm a pro Russia Chinese. We are not White people. White people do not respect non Whites. We Chinese have J-20. We make everything ourselves. We don't depend on White people. Can't say the same about Pakistan.
If Russian is not white than what @undertakerwwefan ???o_Oo_Oo_O and Russian betray you in Past and white people is do more respect for non whites, so why are you in canada there is lots of white people in Canada too @undertakerwwefan :sick:
 
.
If Russian is not white than what @undertakerwwefan ???o_Oo_Oo_O and Russian betray you in Past and white people is do more respect for non whites, so why are you in canada there is lots of white people in Canada too @undertakerwwefan :sick:

I study in Canada. Then I go back to China to develop China into super power and take on White people.

Canada is very advanced. Abrams tank fire control computer is made in Canada. Canada CF-105 was the best plane in the world in the 1950s.

 
.
Back
Top Bottom