What's new

Israel Hypocrisy: Israel supports independent Kurdistan

Syrian Lion

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
7,264
Reaction score
3
Country
Syrian Arab Republic
Location
Syrian Arab Republic
Citing the “collapse” of Iraq amid the ISIS insurgency and sectarian violence, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has endorsed the de-facto independence of Iraqi Kurds. Netanyahu has also called to support the “Kurdish aspiration for independence.”

The hawkish Israeli leader said on Sunday that Kurds are “fighting people that has proved its political commitment, political moderation, and deserves political independence,” Reuters reported.

Speaking to Tel Aviv University’s INSS think-tank, Netanyahu described the situation in Iraq and the Middle East in general as a “collapse,” due to strife between Sunni and Shiite Muslims.

Amid the recent insurgency of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS/ISIL) militants, Kurds have seized the opportunity to bring a long-sought independent state of Kurdistan closer to reality. Kurdish Peshmerga armed forces have been guarding their provincial borders from ISIS, but also seized the contested Iraqi city of Kirkuk, proclaiming it part of their territory.

Now, in an apparent clash against the international community's support of a united Iraq, the Israeli leader has called to back the de-facto independence of Kurds.

“We should...support the Kurdish aspiration for independence,” Netanyahu was quoted as saying.

Netanyahu’s words followed similar statements by senior Israeli officials. Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Thursday told US Secretary of State John Kerry that he believes “the creation of an independent Kurdish state is a foregone conclusion,” citing Iraq’s “breaking up.” Meanwhile, Israeli President Shimon Peres told US President Barack Obama that “the Kurds have, de facto, created their own state, which is democratic.”

READ MORE: Israel says disintegration in Iraq may lead to independent Kurdish state

The 40 million-strong Kurdish population has historically been scattered between northern Iraq, eastern Syria, southeastern Turkey, and western Iran – and has been denied independence by each of those countries. Kurds have had the broadest autonomy in Iraq, ruled by the Kurdistan Regional Government. Iraq is the only country that has accepted the Kurdish language as official. Turkey and Syria have restricted its use.

‘Deal or no deal with Palestine, IDF will stay’
Netanyahu on Sunday also officially confirmed what was reported in Israeli media earlier this year, in regards to sustained military presence in the occupied Palestinian territories.

In a policy speech Sunday night, Netanyahu said that there would have to be a long-term presence of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) throughout the West Bank, even after any future deal with the Palestinians, AP reported.

The Israeli government’s position on the issue comes in sharp contrast to that of the international community, which has been calling for IDF’s withdrawal from the West Bank to make way for an independent Palestinian state.

Israeli PM Netanyahu endorses Kurdish independence citing chaos in Iraq — RT News

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Hypocrisy at its best, what about Palestine?? the world needs to wake up, everything that is happening in the middle east, is because of the west and Israel, they want to control the whole region....
 
. .
Good idea for Israel. The Kurds and Israel should form an economic and military alliance.

You have been here for few years now. Me too.

Wait till the end of this year and you will know what is good. What is not.
 
. . .
I wonder what Turkey's response to this if anything will be....maybe strong diplomatic support for a Palestinian state?
 
. .
.

Surprising, at the same time not.

More like taking Mosul and Tikrit unilaterally........... now there is a reason, the will was already there..........

I don't believe any nation wants to get involved yet, the non-Sunni provinces are still the states control. They are also on the offensive now. It's going to be an un-official partitioned state for now.
 
.
Maybe you are right, however, Turkish hawks are cooking something............ let's wait and see......... at the moment it's all too effed up, even to make an educated guess.................

I don't believe any nation wants to get involved yet, the non-Sunni provinces are still the states control. They are also on the offensive now. It's going to be an un-official partitioned state for now.
 
.
Maybe you are right, however, Turkish hawks are cooking something............ let's wait and see......... at the moment it's all too effed up, even to make an educated guess.................

If you notice, ISIS is also an organization that feels satisfied with what they have now. I believe they want go any further and just wanted the Western province of Iraq. Although honestly that was unpredictable, their move came out of the sudden. Which is why you never know what to expect in this region. We can only wait and see.

I'm positive there have been talks between the leaderships though.
 
.
Hypocrisy at its best, what about Palestine?? the world needs to wake up, everything that is happening in the middle east, is because of the west and Israel, they want to control the whole region....
That's the attitude that keeps middle east from moving forward. Yes US and Israel are major players but no they are not responsible for everything that happens in middle east.

Middle Eastern countries are held back by their own sectarian conflicts and their extremist version of Islam. The attitude of blaming outsiders for everything does not help any country in the world.
 
.
That's the attitude that keeps middle east from moving forward. Yes US and Israel are major players but no they are not responsible for everything that happens in middle east.

Middle Eastern countries are held back by their own sectarian conflicts and their extremist version of Islam. The attitude of blaming outsiders for everything does not help any country in the world.
I never heard of Shia and Sunni conflicts until us Invasion of Iraq in 2003, do you agree? now compare the countries before the US interfered into them, let me name you a couple, Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Syria and much more, they were peaceful countries before the US and the west interfered in their internal affairs... so don't tell me the west has nothing to do with them...

and don't forget who raised AQ and who supported Osama Bin Laden...
 
.
I never heard of Shia and Sunni conflicts until us Invasion of Iraq in 2003, do you agree? now compare the countries before the US interfered into them, let me name you a couple, Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Syria and much more, they were peaceful countries before the US and the west interfered in their internal affairs... so don't tell me the west has nothing to do with them...

and don't forget who raised AQ and who supported Osama Bin Laden...
You did not hear does not mean it did not happen. I was not born in 1945, does not mean the Berlin Operation was fiction.
 
.
You did not hear does not mean it did not happen. I was not born in 1945, does not mean the Berlin Operation was fiction.
yes, but I can research about it, yes?? there were Shia and Sunnis conflict back year 1000's but I'm talking about this modern age...

for example look at Iraq-Iran war, some say it is sectarian... and guess who was involved in it?? the USA

and like I said before, compare the countries of where the USA is involved or interfered in, before and after... USA policy in the middle east is, you either become our puppet, or your destroyed...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom