What's new

Israel claims Iran sent Libya's Haftar anti-tank arms

call me old fashion , but saying someone is idiot ,is equal to insulting him for me.
y the way show my post that I called somebody a suicide bomber when he/she was not a suicide bomber or beheader or cannibal. and show a post of me that I said even those suicide bombers or headchoppers or cannibals need a bullet in their head.

and if you think Assaad is depleted then you clearly knew nothing about syria . do you knew how many arms he recieved from Russia and Iran in last years ? let just say a lot more than many other countries have bought in their all existence

As I said, you like to play dumb, we are talking about your Iranian brothers who call every other person on forum derogatory terms.

So you agree it is all Iranian/Russian arms and those with capability to transport them are Iran and Russia too. You are supporting my point without realizing it.
 
.
As I said, you like to play dumb, we are talking about your Iranian brothers who call every other person on forum derogatory terms.
you are talking with me not with them

So you agree it is all Iranian/Russian arms and those with capability to transport them are Iran and Russia too. You are supporting my point without realizing it.
do I need to agree with any thing , you look at Libya and you see the weapons are Turkish or Russian or Iranian and no we are not the ones who can do the transport ,Syria , UAE and Russia are very well capable of doing the heavy work better than us . we don't have any trade or supply rout with Libya .
and if we sell or give a weapon to somebody and then they transport it to a third party then you must and talk with them not us. we don't put tracker in our weapons and our weapons don't have kill switch and you can find them at the hand of both side .GNA even use them more , and the difference is we previously sold some weapon directly to GNA, but its UAE and Syria who gave our weapons to LNA
 
.
you are talking with me not with them


do I need to agree with any thing , you look at Libya and you see the weapons are Turkish or Russian or Iranian and no we are not the ones who can do the transport ,Syria , UAE and Russia are very well capable of doing the heavy work better than us . we don't have any trade or supply rout with Libya .
and if we sell or give a weapon to somebody and then they transport it to a third party then you must and talk with them not us. we don't put tracker in our weapons and our weapons don't have kill switch and you can find them at the hand of both side .GNA even use them more , and the difference is we previously sold some weapon directly to GNA, but its UAE and Syria who gave our weapons to LNA

This is your theory and it is up to forum audience to believe it or not.
 
. .
You are an idiot that attempt to deceive people, you think Iran want people to know its true intentions in the region? I and others here don't care for your talking points or selling points. We know what Iran is aiming for and what its policies in the region are. We know what bigger implications these meetings have, nobody but you believes these LNA officials meeting with depleted and exhausted Syrian regime for security support. It's for requests from Russia/Iran.

...
...

TRIPOLI

A committee formed by Libya’s renegade commander Khalifa Haftar visited Syria to meet officials of the Bashar al-Assad regime.

According to eastern Benghazi-based Al Marsad online newspaper, the Libyan committee that visited Damascus on Saturday included Haftar’s illegitimate government's Vice President Abdurrahman al-Ahirash, Foreign Relations and International Aid Minister Abdullah, Defense Minister Younes Farhan and intelligence chief Mustafa al-Mukaran.

It was stated that during the visit, politics, security and intelligence sharing would be on the agenda, along with "Turkey's operations".
....
....
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/africa/haftars-team-pays-visit-to-syrian-regime-officials/1750887



Assad is no position to hand out arms across region, it is Russia and Iran.
Reported for personal insults.

@BHarwana @krash @waz
 
. . . .
There were rumors of Damascus joining the party too and with Russia already in it would be surprising if Iran wasnt involved.

Well, Haftars problem is not tanks but something else anyways. :D

How many countries is Turkey taking on by itself at this point?
 
.
How many countries is Turkey taking on by itself at this point?
UAE, Greece, Egypt and France directly. Russia, Syria, and KSA indirectly. And in the Turkish corner we have... No one.

Would be allies of Turkey actually had the nerve to say "well Turkey is having massive success, that won't do - call for ceasefire immediately".

I dream that one day a militarily capable country would help us in one damn conflict.

It's gotten so fucking ridiculous that even when we are at odds with countries that are enemies to each other, they still drop everything and oppose Turkey instead (Russia vs USA).
 
.
No surprise that Iran is stoking more Arab fires. They have two motives. One is to keep another Arab country in chaos which means one less Arab country that can oppose them. And they get to prevent the west from a successful regime change in the M.E. This is why it was so important for Iran that Iraq became a total mess too.

I guess a bonus for Iran now is to try and get the Turks bogged down in Libya.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom