What's new

ISPR more lethal than ISI, Indian govt warned

Chakar The Great

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
0
Country
United Kingdom
Location
Ireland
Days after a former Indian military commander praised the Pakistan Army’s media wing for employing outstanding strategy in the domain of hybrid warfare, a prominent cyber-intelligence specialist warned the India government of the threat the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) poses.



“If there is a Pakistani inter-services directorate as lethal as the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), it is, undoubtedly, the Inter-Services Public Relations,” Pukhraj Singh wrote in his latest article for The Print.

In his opinion, the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi was too late in spotting the danger after Facebook took down pages mending the public opinion ahead of Indian general elections.

Just like the former Indian commander, Lt-Gen (retd) Syed Ata Hussain who had acknowledged superiority of Pakistan Army’s media wing over its Indian counterpart, Singh also hailed the ISPR’s information warfare strategies especially in the showdown after Pulwama incident.
17096468_84006185.jpg



India’s ex-general hails ISPR for ‘outclass information war’

Last week, Lt-Gen (retd) Hussain had remarked during a speech that the Inter-Services Public Relations outclassed the Indian army in information war. “I want to give full marks to the ISPR for the information strategy it has played out,” he said while addressing the International Institute of Strategic Studies in UK on Thursday.

According to Singh, Pakistani Army has conducted a series of public wargames — Azm-e-Nau, meant to counter India’s ‘Cold Start’ doctrine. “With many successful iterations over the years, these exercises simulated massive mobilisations augmented by net-centric warfare, stopping short at the tactical nuclear weapons threshold,” he wrote.

“Interestingly, the said wargames treated the ISPR as the crucial pivot of conflict escalation and de-escalation. It was meant to undertake information operations, military deception and strategic communications – benignly dubbed as perception management in military parlance.

“This was a couple of years prior to ‘hybrid war’ becoming all the rage in the media circles, manifesting itself as the wildly successful Russian playbook against Georgia, Ukraine, and the US elections. From leveraging non-uniformed militias to undertaking disruptive cyber operations that seeded widescale paranoia and confusion, the Russians reintroduced the cognitive dimension to this emerging format of war.”

By F-16s or JF-17s, India can’t deny downing of jets: ISPR

Valery Gerasimov, the chief of the general staff of the armed forces of Russia, is thought to be the key proponent of its hybrid war philosophy, first delivered as part of his address to the Academy of Military Sciences in March 2018. The contents of his lecture gained such prominence that the Western media now prefers to call it the ‘Gerasimov Doctrine’.

“With his carefully orchestrated social media spectacles during and after the Balakot escalation, Major General Asif Ghafoor, the incumbent director general of the ISPR, proved to be a formidable disruptor as well,” Singh maintained.

In the aftermath of violation of Pakistani airspace by India, there were times when ISPR’s Twitter shenanigans pushed the envelope and stole the initiative for a few minutes. They did put the Indian machinery in reactive mode, especially after the capture of a fighter pilot.
 
. . . .
so now india's new mantra is: ISPR ki napak sajish! :woot:
 
.
TBH i think so ISPR is more useful these days .

In this age of internet, news and views getting viral in seconds, hybrid war is more important, it is about controlling the minds, ISPR has come a long way, intl' publications is portraying Pakistan POV, of POW.



D0jOUCAXcAEipRd.jpg
 
.
In this age of internet, news and views getting viral in seconds, hybrid war is more important, it is about controlling the minds, ISPR has come a long way, intl' publications is portraying Pakistan POV, of POW.



D0jOUCAXcAEipRd.jpg
they were good at old times too . the time of TV era they brodcast programs weekly magzine like hilal and do other activites too . i still remember ispr of 90s . but now they and lakhs of paksitanis on internet doing good . paksitani awam ne sawab ka kam smajh ker kerna shuru ker diya 5th gen war per kam :rofl:
 
.
the new fight for bakth crowd with their constipated s#it, cruising ISPR for the fight. After making ISI famous they will make ISPR famous. For absolutely free.
 
. . .
In this age of internet, news and views getting viral in seconds, hybrid war is more important, it is about controlling the minds, ISPR has come a long way, intl' publications is portraying Pakistan POV, of POW.



D0jOUCAXcAEipRd.jpg
The main reason behind ISPR's success is very simple but Indians won't acknowledge it and that is the truth, facts & evidence. ISPR didn't do anything extra-ordinary except presenting the facts with evidence. Could anyone deny downing of the A/C when we showed its wreckage and then the video of Abi Nandan receiving thrashing at the hands of the locals, Pak army soldier saving his life, and then Abi walking with his bloody nose to enjoying a cup of tea... so we had the irrefutable evidence while Indians had none.
But our DGISPR was composed, his words were carefully chosen and the environment was disciplined, professional and still relaxed while Indians were nervous, angry, scared, and hiding things...
 
Last edited:
.
The main reason behind ISPR's success is very simple but Indians won't acknowledge it and that is the truth,


As it is said 'don't believe in anything unless it is officially denied by the government(the other side here), if they are denying it, it means it is true.

ISPR didn't anything extra-ordinary except presenting the facts with evidence. Could anyone deny downing of the A/C when we showed its wreckage and then the video of Abi Nandan receiving thrashing at the hands of the locals, Pak army soldier saving his life, and then Abi walking with his bloody nose to enjoying a cup of tea... so we had the irrefutable evidence while Indians had none.
But our DGISPR was composed, his words were carefully chosen and the environment was disciplined, professional and still relaxed while Indians were nervous, angry, scared, and hiding things...

ISPR point of view is more reliable, believable, trustworthy, guaranteed than of any Indian agency, in fact there is none, the IA, IAF doing the presser turned out to be a joke.


have posted a thread about that Indian presser...

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/laug...nce-on-balakot-and-pakistan-intrusion.604800/
 
.
Only thing that helped ISPR were the facts. The degree of India’s absurdity & lies were so extreme, it became difficult even for pro-India writers and analysts to defend. In my view, the ISPR uses outdated & globally irrelevant tactics to get its message across. Ongoing exaggeration of ISPR role seems to be a deliberate attempt to give steam to India’s current efforts to repress Pakistani voices on social media by beating the ISPR boogeyman.

It’s regrettable even Pakistan’s are falling for this trick. During the entire February standoff, ISPR limited its role to establishment of certain facts that were already on public domain. A competent and up to date communications team would have exploited India’s brutal beating to influence the debate in India regarding the outcome by presenting irrefutable and embarrassing information.

Maybe ISPR needs to hire an international strategic communications consultants to help it polish its narrative.
 
. .
I don’t understand, Pak is so impressive in military and security. It punches well above its weight. It probably 2nd in the world after Israel, people should be very proud and impressed.

But what I don’t understand is why this cannot translate into the economy and build the country on a war footing - infrastructure, hospitals and ports could be brought up to international standard with this expertise.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom