What's new

Islamabad's hard-won gains against Tehrik-i-Taliban could be lost if Afghanistan descends into chaos

Akatosh

BANNED
Joined
Apr 26, 2021
Messages
423
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
India
Islamabad's hard-won gains against Tehrik-i-Taliban could be lost if Afghanistan descends into chaos

For over four decades, Islamabad has borne the brunt of conflict in Kabul.

Maleeha Lodhi

Aug 04, 2021 · 07:30 pm

A border crossing point between Pakistan and Afghanistan in Balochistan. | Banaras Khan / AFP

As concern grows in Pakistan about the fallout of the deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan, protracted fighting that morphs into civil war will pose severe dilemmas and multiple challenges for the country.

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan reiterated this fear in a recent interview with an American TV network when he said such an outcome would be the “worst-case scenario for the country”.

Pakistan's security is inextricably tied to Afghanistan. Prolonged strife in its neighbor will expose Pakistan to security threats that it has dealt with in the past at a heavy cost in lives and social and economic consequences.

ADVERTISEMENT

Threat to stability

For over four decades Pakistan has borne the brunt of war, foreign military interventions and conflict in Afghanistan that produced grave repercussions for the country's security, stability and economic development. The destabilizing ramifications are too well known to bear repetition here. More turmoil on its western frontier would mean the country will have to simultaneously deal with internal, regional and international challenges that would flow from this outcome.



In a back-to-the-future scenario, Pakistan will be faced with a serious threat to its stability if civil war erupts in Afghanistan and spills over into its border areas. Pakistan has sought to mitigate this danger by fencing much of the border, sealing illegal crossing points, increasing border posts, strengthening the capacity of the Frontier Corps, upgrading the training of law-enforcement personnel, enhancing technical surveillance and stationing regular troops there.

While these measures are necessary, they may not be sufficient to stop the determined from crossing over given the long border and the mountainous terrain and topography.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover, a chaotic situation across the border will provide fertile ground and more space to a host of militant groups to continue operating from there. The principal but not only threat is from the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (the Pakistani Taliban) whose 6,500 members are based in Afghanistan and launch cross-border from there.

Taliban in Pakistan

A reunified Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan has reinforced its capacity. The latest report of the United Nations' monitoring team notes that "the return of splinter groups to the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan fold has increased its strength."

The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan's links continue with the Afghan Taliban, which are acknowledged by Pakistan's security officials. Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan leader Noor Wali Mehsud surfaced recently to announce in a CNN interview that his militant group will continue its "war against Pakistan's security forces" and its aim is to "take control of the border and make them independent".

ADVERTISEMENT

A surge in violence in North and South Waziristan has led to rising among Pakistani security personnel in recent months. Since May, there have been 167 terrorist incidents in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, an ominous portent of what could lie ahead.

Armed groups residing in Afghanistan would pose a threat to Pakistan with some making common cause with elements who were defeated but dispersed after a series of successful operations by security forces. The UN report says that “a significant part of the Al Qaeda leadership is based along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border” while ISIS-K or Daesh “remains active and dangerous.”

Pakistani military officials have already warned of terrorist sleeper cells being galvanized if there is protracted fighting next door. In Balochistan, there could be a further rise in violent activity by revived dissidents and other groups orchestrated by hostile foreign intelligence agencies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thus, Pakistan's hard-won gains in its counterterrorism campaign could be upended. Prime Minister Khan said pointedly in the PBS interview that a civil war in Afghanistan would mean "terrorism in Pakistan". Also, forces of extremism in the country will take heart and be emboldened by the Taliban's military success.

A civil war could also lead to a fresh refugee influx into Pakistan which has hosted three million Afghan refugees for decades now. Pakistani officials worry that fighting will force more Afghans to flee with estimates of new refugees ranging from 500,000 to 700,000.

Apart from instituting more effective border controls the government is working on a plan to establish camps near the border to prevent refugees from entering the mainland. Whether the Iranian 'model' can work here is open to question especially as tribes are so intertwined on both sides of the border. Using the nomenclature “externally displaced Afghans” to describe them could put at risk international assistance for these refugees as that depends on their refugee status. World Bank funding for refugees too could be in jeopardy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regional security concerns

Then there is the likely economic fallout that Pakistan also experienced in the past. Given how fragile and vulnerable the economy is the shock from a civil war next door and the threat of violence at home will jeopardise prospects of growth and investment.

This will place Pakistan in a zone of instability which will dampen trade and investment badly needed to achieve economic growth targets. The recent past shows that Pakistan had to bear billions of dollars in economic losses in the aftermath of 9/11 when the “war on terror” spilt over into the country's border areas and cities.

Beyond this, a civil war can lead to a regional proxy war, as it did in the past, but with more damaging consequences and drawing in more countries that perceive threats to their security and are already beefing up their defences. It could turn out to be fiercer than what followed the Russian military withdrawal in the 1990s as neighbors and near neighbors act to protect their interests.

ADVERTISEMENT

More regional states have security concerns now than was the case during Afghanistan's previous bout of the civil war because of transnational armed groups and foreign terrorist fighters who operate from there. They include the Turkistan Islamic Party, Daesh, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan and of course Al Qaeda. There are also fears of fighters in Syria relocating to the region. A proxy war could trigger a regional geopolitical crisis of uncertain proportions.

All this may sound alarmist but it is predicated on a worst-case scenario of Afghanistan descending into chaos and civil war. This only underlines the urgency of regional and international diplomatic efforts to avert such an outcome. There is time yet for these efforts to make headway. Ultimately, however, it will be up to the Afghan parties to make the difficult compromises that can deliver peace to their long-suffering people.

 
. .
Islamabad's hard-won gains against Tehrik-i-Taliban could be lost if Afghanistan descends into chaos

For over four decades, Islamabad has borne the brunt of conflict in Kabul.

Maleeha Lodhi

Aug 04, 2021 · 07:30 pm

A border crossing point between Pakistan and Afghanistan in Balochistan. | Banaras Khan / AFP

As concern grows in Pakistan about the fallout of the deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan, protracted fighting that morphs into civil war will pose severe dilemmas and multiple challenges for the country.

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan reiterated this fear in a recent interview with an American TV network when he said such an outcome would be the “worst-case scenario for the country”.

Pakistan's security is inextricably tied to Afghanistan. Prolonged strife in its neighbor will expose Pakistan to security threats that it has dealt with in the past at a heavy cost in lives and social and economic consequences.

ADVERTISEMENT

Threat to stability

For over four decades Pakistan has borne the brunt of war, foreign military interventions and conflict in Afghanistan that produced grave repercussions for the country's security, stability and economic development. The destabilizing ramifications are too well known to bear repetition here. More turmoil on its western frontier would mean the country will have to simultaneously deal with internal, regional and international challenges that would flow from this outcome.



In a back-to-the-future scenario, Pakistan will be faced with a serious threat to its stability if civil war erupts in Afghanistan and spills over into its border areas. Pakistan has sought to mitigate this danger by fencing much of the border, sealing illegal crossing points, increasing border posts, strengthening the capacity of the Frontier Corps, upgrading the training of law-enforcement personnel, enhancing technical surveillance and stationing regular troops there.

While these measures are necessary, they may not be sufficient to stop the determined from crossing over given the long border and the mountainous terrain and topography.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover, a chaotic situation across the border will provide fertile ground and more space to a host of militant groups to continue operating from there. The principal but not only threat is from the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (the Pakistani Taliban) whose 6,500 members are based in Afghanistan and launch cross-border from there.

Taliban in Pakistan

A reunified Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan has reinforced its capacity. The latest report of the United Nations' monitoring team notes that "the return of splinter groups to the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan fold has increased its strength."

The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan's links continue with the Afghan Taliban, which are acknowledged by Pakistan's security officials. Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan leader Noor Wali Mehsud surfaced recently to announce in a CNN interview that his militant group will continue its "war against Pakistan's security forces" and its aim is to "take control of the border and make them independent".

ADVERTISEMENT

A surge in violence in North and South Waziristan has led to rising among Pakistani security personnel in recent months. Since May, there have been 167 terrorist incidents in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, an ominous portent of what could lie ahead.

Armed groups residing in Afghanistan would pose a threat to Pakistan with some making common cause with elements who were defeated but dispersed after a series of successful operations by security forces. The UN report says that “a significant part of the Al Qaeda leadership is based along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border” while ISIS-K or Daesh “remains active and dangerous.”

Pakistani military officials have already warned of terrorist sleeper cells being galvanized if there is protracted fighting next door. In Balochistan, there could be a further rise in violent activity by revived dissidents and other groups orchestrated by hostile foreign intelligence agencies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thus, Pakistan's hard-won gains in its counterterrorism campaign could be upended. Prime Minister Khan said pointedly in the PBS interview that a civil war in Afghanistan would mean "terrorism in Pakistan". Also, forces of extremism in the country will take heart and be emboldened by the Taliban's military success.

A civil war could also lead to a fresh refugee influx into Pakistan which has hosted three million Afghan refugees for decades now. Pakistani officials worry that fighting will force more Afghans to flee with estimates of new refugees ranging from 500,000 to 700,000.

Apart from instituting more effective border controls the government is working on a plan to establish camps near the border to prevent refugees from entering the mainland. Whether the Iranian 'model' can work here is open to question especially as tribes are so intertwined on both sides of the border. Using the nomenclature “externally displaced Afghans” to describe them could put at risk international assistance for these refugees as that depends on their refugee status. World Bank funding for refugees too could be in jeopardy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regional security concerns

Then there is the likely economic fallout that Pakistan also experienced in the past. Given how fragile and vulnerable the economy is the shock from a civil war next door and the threat of violence at home will jeopardise prospects of growth and investment.

This will place Pakistan in a zone of instability which will dampen trade and investment badly needed to achieve economic growth targets. The recent past shows that Pakistan had to bear billions of dollars in economic losses in the aftermath of 9/11 when the “war on terror” spilt over into the country's border areas and cities.

Beyond this, a civil war can lead to a regional proxy war, as it did in the past, but with more damaging consequences and drawing in more countries that perceive threats to their security and are already beefing up their defences. It could turn out to be fiercer than what followed the Russian military withdrawal in the 1990s as neighbors and near neighbors act to protect their interests.

ADVERTISEMENT

More regional states have security concerns now than was the case during Afghanistan's previous bout of the civil war because of transnational armed groups and foreign terrorist fighters who operate from there. They include the Turkistan Islamic Party, Daesh, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan and of course Al Qaeda. There are also fears of fighters in Syria relocating to the region. A proxy war could trigger a regional geopolitical crisis of uncertain proportions.

All this may sound alarmist but it is predicated on a worst-case scenario of Afghanistan descending into chaos and civil war. This only underlines the urgency of regional and international diplomatic efforts to avert such an outcome. There is time yet for these efforts to make headway. Ultimately, however, it will be up to the Afghan parties to make the difficult compromises that can deliver peace to their long-suffering people.


Indian news channel = automatically full of bs
 
.
Islamabad's hard-won gains against Tehrik-i-Taliban could be lost if Afghanistan descends into chaos

For over four decades, Islamabad has borne the brunt of conflict in Kabul.

Maleeha Lodhi

Aug 04, 2021 · 07:30 pm

A border crossing point between Pakistan and Afghanistan in Balochistan. | Banaras Khan / AFP

As concern grows in Pakistan about the fallout of the deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan, protracted fighting that morphs into civil war will pose severe dilemmas and multiple challenges for the country.

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan reiterated this fear in a recent interview with an American TV network when he said such an outcome would be the “worst-case scenario for the country”.

Pakistan's security is inextricably tied to Afghanistan. Prolonged strife in its neighbor will expose Pakistan to security threats that it has dealt with in the past at a heavy cost in lives and social and economic consequences.

ADVERTISEMENT

Threat to stability

For over four decades Pakistan has borne the brunt of war, foreign military interventions and conflict in Afghanistan that produced grave repercussions for the country's security, stability and economic development. The destabilizing ramifications are too well known to bear repetition here. More turmoil on its western frontier would mean the country will have to simultaneously deal with internal, regional and international challenges that would flow from this outcome.



In a back-to-the-future scenario, Pakistan will be faced with a serious threat to its stability if civil war erupts in Afghanistan and spills over into its border areas. Pakistan has sought to mitigate this danger by fencing much of the border, sealing illegal crossing points, increasing border posts, strengthening the capacity of the Frontier Corps, upgrading the training of law-enforcement personnel, enhancing technical surveillance and stationing regular troops there.

While these measures are necessary, they may not be sufficient to stop the determined from crossing over given the long border and the mountainous terrain and topography.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover, a chaotic situation across the border will provide fertile ground and more space to a host of militant groups to continue operating from there. The principal but not only threat is from the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (the Pakistani Taliban) whose 6,500 members are based in Afghanistan and launch cross-border from there.

Taliban in Pakistan

A reunified Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan has reinforced its capacity. The latest report of the United Nations' monitoring team notes that "the return of splinter groups to the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan fold has increased its strength."

The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan's links continue with the Afghan Taliban, which are acknowledged by Pakistan's security officials. Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan leader Noor Wali Mehsud surfaced recently to announce in a CNN interview that his militant group will continue its "war against Pakistan's security forces" and its aim is to "take control of the border and make them independent".

ADVERTISEMENT

A surge in violence in North and South Waziristan has led to rising among Pakistani security personnel in recent months. Since May, there have been 167 terrorist incidents in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, an ominous portent of what could lie ahead.

Armed groups residing in Afghanistan would pose a threat to Pakistan with some making common cause with elements who were defeated but dispersed after a series of successful operations by security forces. The UN report says that “a significant part of the Al Qaeda leadership is based along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border” while ISIS-K or Daesh “remains active and dangerous.”

Pakistani military officials have already warned of terrorist sleeper cells being galvanized if there is protracted fighting next door. In Balochistan, there could be a further rise in violent activity by revived dissidents and other groups orchestrated by hostile foreign intelligence agencies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thus, Pakistan's hard-won gains in its counterterrorism campaign could be upended. Prime Minister Khan said pointedly in the PBS interview that a civil war in Afghanistan would mean "terrorism in Pakistan". Also, forces of extremism in the country will take heart and be emboldened by the Taliban's military success.

A civil war could also lead to a fresh refugee influx into Pakistan which has hosted three million Afghan refugees for decades now. Pakistani officials worry that fighting will force more Afghans to flee with estimates of new refugees ranging from 500,000 to 700,000.

Apart from instituting more effective border controls the government is working on a plan to establish camps near the border to prevent refugees from entering the mainland. Whether the Iranian 'model' can work here is open to question especially as tribes are so intertwined on both sides of the border. Using the nomenclature “externally displaced Afghans” to describe them could put at risk international assistance for these refugees as that depends on their refugee status. World Bank funding for refugees too could be in jeopardy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regional security concerns

Then there is the likely economic fallout that Pakistan also experienced in the past. Given how fragile and vulnerable the economy is the shock from a civil war next door and the threat of violence at home will jeopardise prospects of growth and investment.

This will place Pakistan in a zone of instability which will dampen trade and investment badly needed to achieve economic growth targets. The recent past shows that Pakistan had to bear billions of dollars in economic losses in the aftermath of 9/11 when the “war on terror” spilt over into the country's border areas and cities.

Beyond this, a civil war can lead to a regional proxy war, as it did in the past, but with more damaging consequences and drawing in more countries that perceive threats to their security and are already beefing up their defences. It could turn out to be fiercer than what followed the Russian military withdrawal in the 1990s as neighbors and near neighbors act to protect their interests.

ADVERTISEMENT

More regional states have security concerns now than was the case during Afghanistan's previous bout of the civil war because of transnational armed groups and foreign terrorist fighters who operate from there. They include the Turkistan Islamic Party, Daesh, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan and of course Al Qaeda. There are also fears of fighters in Syria relocating to the region. A proxy war could trigger a regional geopolitical crisis of uncertain proportions.

All this may sound alarmist but it is predicated on a worst-case scenario of Afghanistan descending into chaos and civil war. This only underlines the urgency of regional and international diplomatic efforts to avert such an outcome. There is time yet for these efforts to make headway. Ultimately, however, it will be up to the Afghan parties to make the difficult compromises that can deliver peace to their long-suffering people.

dont you worry about us!
 
.
this was an article in Dawn few days back by Maleeha Lodhi republished by this Indian news channel.
 
. . .
My take on on this article by Maliha Lodhi ......

Note:

- I know lingua franca of this forum is english but I don't think anybody would be able to justify the dept of this basic Urdu proverb by translating it in english.

- Character of cat in this short story for children is not the proverbial representation of Ms. Maliha Lodhi

بخشو بی بلی چوہا لنڈورا ہی بھلا

بچوں کا جنگ

SEPTEMBER 13, 2019

بخشو بی بلی چوہا لنڈورا ہی بھلا

لنڈورا یعنی دم کٹا۔ مطلب یہ کہ کسی کام میں نقصان ہو جائے تو مزید نقصان سے بچنے کے لئے اس کام کو چھوڑ دینا چاہئے۔یہ کہاوت اس وقت بولی جاتی ہے جب کوئی چالاک شخص اپنی چکنی چپڑی باتوں سے کسی کو دھوکا دینا چاہے اور وہ اس سے ایک دفعہ نقصان اٹھا چکنے کی وجہ سے دوبارہ اس
کی باتوں میں نہ آئے۔

اس کا قصہ یہ ہے کہ ایک دفعہ ایک بلی نے ایک چوہے کو پکڑنے کے لئے چھلانگ لگائی۔ چوہا جھکائی دے کر بچ نکلا مگر پھر بھی بلی نے جاتے جاتے ایک پنجہ مار کر اس کی دم اکھیڑ لی۔ چوہا جان سلامت لے کر بل میں پہنچا تو خدا کا شکر ادا کیا؛ اگرچہ اسے لنڈورا ہونے کا بے حد دکھ تھا۔ بلی بہت کائیاں تھی۔ اس نے ہاتھ آئے شکار کو یوں
جاتے دیکھا تو ایک چال چلی۔

چوہے کے بل کے پاس جاکر
بولی،’’ارے بھانجے، تو تو مجھ سے خواہ مخواہ ہی ڈر گیا۔ میں تو تیری خالہ ہوں۔ تجھ سے مذاق کر رہی تھی۔ چل آ باہر آ! تیری دم جوڑ دوں۔ لنڈورا بہت برا معلوم ہوگا۔” مگر چوہا بھی بہت سیانا تھا۔ بلی
کی نیت بھانپ کر بولا، “بخشو بی خالہ بلی! میں لنڈورا ہی بھلا‘‘۔ ا​
 
.
I'd doubt our gains would be lost. I mean if that's the case, then the terrorists would be in control of some areas of FATA roaming around freely. We all know that's not the case.

Terrorists attacks are happening. We are losing men. But that's because of the terrorists desperation and their backers desperation. I'll tell you this though, contrary to what @Areesh thinks, the military isnt sleeping nor isn't aware of what's happening. They know. And a lot of things will happen. The grip is getting tighter around the terrorits neck. It's just a matter of time of when it will snap.
 
Last edited:
.
I'd doubt our gains would be lost. I mean if that's the case, then the terrorists would be in control of some areas of FATA roaming around freely. We all know that's not the case.

Terrorists attacks are happening. We are losing men. But that's because of the terrorists desperation and their backers desperation. I'll tell you this though, contrary to what @Areesh thinks, the military is sleeping nor isn't aware of what's happening. They know. And a lot of things will happen. The grip is getting tighter around the terrorits neck. It's just a matter of time of when it will snap.

Since ANA is losing ground the terrorists operations has signficiantly slowed down inside pakistna the backers were obviously from Afghanistan.. PLF is almost not heard from in ages
 
.
Both TTP and TLP belong to different sects and have different objectives, nothing common in them apart from the attire.
 
.
Since ANA is losing ground the terrorists operations has signficiantly slowed down inside pakistna the backers were obviously from Afghanistan.. PLF is almost not heard from in ages
UBA tried attacking an army post protecting cpec. It went badly for them. Very badly.

2 things could have happened to BLF. Our op in balochistan could've wiped out their forces here and they retreated back to Afghanistan. Or they just fled to Afghanistan. I'm not really sure. I'm hoping it's the first scenario.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom