What's new

Is There A Clash Of Civilizations?

future_bound

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
168
Reaction score
-10
Is there a clash of civilizations between muslim Pakistan and hindu india?

This is old news from BBC but still relevent today

BBC NEWS | South Asia | Pakistan's missile symbolism

Pakistan's missile symbolism
By Zaffar Abbas
BBC correspondent in Islamabad

Pakistani officials say the successful test-firing of three of its surface-to-surface missiles in the last few days has confirmed the country's capability to strike deep inside enemy territory in the event of a war.

Interestingly, these tests have not only demonstrated the effectiveness of Pakistan's missile technology; the names given to these missiles are full of symbolism.

They suggest that Pakistan relates the present conflict in South Asia to the conflicts of the mediaeval period when Muslim warriors from Afghanistan frequently invaded India.

Ghauri, Ghaznavi, Abdali - these are the three ballistic missiles Pakistan test-fired in the last week.

But these are also names of three prominent Muslim warlords, or conquerors, who invaded India from Afghanistan between the 11th and 18th centuries in an attempt to expand their empires.

Historical histrionics

The medium-range Ghauri missile is Pakistan's answer to India's Prithvi missile, and here the symbolism is perhaps most interesting.

Muhammad Ghauri was a powerful Afghan warlord who in the 12th century had two fierce battles with the Hindu ruler of northern India, Prithviraj Chouhan.

Ghauri was defeated in the first battle and later on, he returned with a bigger army to achieve a convincing victory.

Although India insists that the name Prithvi given to its missile means "earth" and has nothing to do with any Hindu ruler of the past, Pakistan wants the world to believe otherwise.

Battle fetish

The other two missiles Pakistan tested during the week are also named after 11th and 18th-century Afghan conquerors, Mehmood Ghaznavi and Ahmed Shah Abdali.

Ghaznavi is described in history books as a temple-destroyer who attacked India 17 times.

Pakistan has never given any specific reason for naming these missiles after such historical figures.

But the symbolism is a clear reflection of the official mindset in the country.

It shows that for Islamabad, the present conflict with India is a continuation of the battles of the past between people described in Pakistani history books as just Muslim invaders and several of India's cruel Hindu emperors.
 
. . . . .
very short but good PoV. this explains the animosity between our countries to a large extent.
although the truth mite be a tad different from the emotional sparkles above.
the illeterate marauders from central asia (read afghanistan) looted, raped, obliterated anything that came to their path. the ancestors of present day pakistan simply bowed and accepted the maltreatment done by the afghan marauders (ironically they are so proud of their looters that they went on to name their missiles after them (now thats being emotionally charged and mentally discharged). these looters proceeded deeper into india until they couldnt possibly go any further (blame logistics, not intentions of the marauders, nor the defenses of the hindu kings).
the operations were guided purely by greed and greed only. those barbarians cared less about religion.
but , yes, if you want to see history though your own perspective, be my guest.:yahoo:
 
.
Is there a clash of civilizations between muslim Pakistan and hindu india?

This is old news from BBC but still relevent today

BBC NEWS | South Asia | Pakistan's missile symbolism

Pakistan's missile symbolism
By Zaffar Abbas
BBC correspondent in Islamabad

Pakistani officials say the successful test-firing of three of its surface-to-surface missiles in the last few days has confirmed the country's capability to strike deep inside enemy territory in the event of a war.

Interestingly, these tests have not only demonstrated the effectiveness of Pakistan's missile technology; the names given to these missiles are full of symbolism.

They suggest that Pakistan relates the present conflict in South Asia to the conflicts of the mediaeval period when Muslim warriors from Afghanistan frequently invaded India.

Ghauri, Ghaznavi, Abdali - these are the three ballistic missiles Pakistan test-fired in the last week.

But these are also names of three prominent Muslim warlords, or conquerors, who invaded India from Afghanistan between the 11th and 18th centuries in an attempt to expand their empires.

Historical histrionics

The medium-range Ghauri missile is Pakistan's answer to India's Prithvi missile, and here the symbolism is perhaps most interesting.

Muhammad Ghauri was a powerful Afghan warlord who in the 12th century had two fierce battles with the Hindu ruler of northern India, Prithviraj Chouhan.

Ghauri was defeated in the first battle and later on, he returned with a bigger army to achieve a convincing victory.

Although India insists that the name Prithvi given to its missile means "earth" and has nothing to do with any Hindu ruler of the past, Pakistan wants the world to believe otherwise.

Battle fetish

The other two missiles Pakistan tested during the week are also named after 11th and 18th-century Afghan conquerors, Mehmood Ghaznavi and Ahmed Shah Abdali.

Ghaznavi is described in history books as a temple-destroyer who attacked India 17 times.

Pakistan has never given any specific reason for naming these missiles after such historical figures.

But the symbolism is a clear reflection of the official mindset in the country.

It shows that for Islamabad, the present conflict with India is a continuation of the battles of the past between people described in Pakistani history books as just Muslim invaders and several of India's cruel Hindu emperors.

Yes their was always clash of civilizations for centuries will remain so Sir and RKHAN we are Muslims first and that is only what matters
 
. . . .
Muslims dont think tht way.. even indian muslims..

Delusions aside, did Afganistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran helped you during 1965,1971,1999??

You people are like kids crying for help in the name of religion.

The clash of civilizations is wrong word, it is an attack on Indian Civilization rather by Barbarians.
 
.
3 reasons.

-They pillaged and looted us irrespective of religion.

-We are at war with them even today.

-We are Pakistan not Afghanistan.

WE ARE MUSLIM! KALMA UNITES US
 
.
Delusions aside, did Afganistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran helped you during 1965,1971,1999??

You people are like kids crying for help in the name of religion.

The clash of civilizations is wrong word, it is an attack on Indian Civilization rather by Barbarians.

Who sent the star fighters tht shot down ur pilots? as for religion... we follow a deen a way of life.. indian civilisation.. :lol:
 
. .
Who sent the star fighters tht shot down ur pilots? as for religion... we follow a deen a way of life.. indian civilisation.. :lol:

Yes Indian civilization irrespective of religion :cheers:

Care to eloborate the bold part.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom