What's new

Is Extension Given To General Bajwa Violation of Article 243.?

. .
Again shameful PTI supporters attacking with vulgarity people asking genuine questions. Fact of the matter is GHQ is running the country. Lets all admit it and move on.
When was GHQ "not" running the country?
 
.
I can reply to certain persons only in the thread which is are regular threads.
I was having disagreement with an elite member and after that it started
@MastanKhan @Dubious
Or maybe the fact that you are not a senior member and thus can't post everywhere ...Some sections are for senior members only...

Another thing could be that you were blocked by some members which is their right

Take your complaint to the GHQ
 
.
According to the Article 243 of the constitution ,the President who happen to be the supreme commander of the Armed forces gives advice to the PM for any appointments. The official notification below does not mention of any advice taken from the President!!!

ECXNO5iXUAgyGtU



The Article 243 states the following.
ECZug9vWsAILnit


In another development the Pakistan Bar council has rejected the extension and has urged the Govt to withdraw its decision.

ECaNYH4WsAMo3Qo

Can we see the presidential order for Gen Kiyani Extension?? Please.

Regarding bar Counsel, it happened during Gen kiyani's ext time too and was dismissed by the court.

When Ext was given to Gen Kiyani sab, we were facing Internal threat from terrorism.
Now Major threats are external, so the question is...which one is more serious....and which extension is more justified then the other.....

I personally am against any extensions, but given the situation and threat level we are facing, I will support Gen Bajwa's ext.
 
.
Or maybe the fact that you are not a senior member and thus can't post everywhere ...Some sections are for senior members only...

Another thing could be that you were blocked by some members which is their right

Take your complaint to the GHQ
So quite a few members blocked me then suddenly. It is all good no need to cry to GHQ and I would not know who runs the GHQ.
Thanks for responding. Blocking tells me people do not like the disagreements.
I will become a senior citizen first before becoming a senior member.
 
. .
I dont know of any settings where you can block members on behalf of another @The Eagle @Arsalan here is another new level of accusations!
I am just telling you what happened and is it a coincidence I am complaining first time and you are saying another level of accusations. I am merely stating a fact and I checked those threads and were not for senior members because I could reply to some and could not to others.
 
.
So quite a few members blocked me then suddenly. It is all good no need to cry to GHQ and I would not know who runs the GHQ.
Thanks for responding. Blocking tells me people do not like the disagreements.
I will become a senior citizen first before becoming a senior member.

I don't know where from you are having such idea of being blocked by members so you can't access such & such section. It is all about your Tag/Seniority (which depends upon your participation on the forum with Time & post count) in regard to have access.
 
.
I don't know where from you are having such idea of being blocked by members so you can't access such & such section. It is all about your Tag/Seniority (which depends upon your participation on the forum with Time & post count) in regard to have access.
Not sections cannot reply to some in the same thread.
 
.
I am just telling you what happened and is it a coincidence I am complaining first time and you are saying another level of accusations. I am merely stating a fact and I checked those threads and were not for senior members because I could reply to some and could not to others.

There are three types of restrictions.
1- Based upon your title of seniority which is due to your post count and time spent on the Forum.
2- If any Mod(s) bans you from specific thread for certain reasons which too is a explained action.
3- You wouldn't have access to Deleted or locked thread.

Not sections cannot reply to some in the same thread.

Check sections of those threads. If you are having issues in this regard, reach GHQ right now and share thread links. Matter will be sorted out. But above all; no member can ban you from any thread at all. The authority lies with Mod(s) only.
 
.
There are three types of restrictions.
1- Based upon your title of seniority which is due to your post count and time spent on the Forum.
2- If any Mod(s) bans you from specific thread for certain reasons which too is a explained action.
3- You wouldn't have access to Deleted or locked thread.



Check sections of those threads. If you are having issues in this regard, reach GHQ right now and share thread links. Matter will be sorted out. But above all; no member can ban you from any thread at all. The authority lies with Mod(s) only.
Ok thanks for your response who runs the GHQ in case I verify the problem exists.
 
.
Did the Bar Council try to understand that PM may have notified Gen. Bajwa as COAS for another 3 years after approval of President?

Ok thanks for your response who runs the GHQ in case I verify the problem exists.

Your problem will be solved. Specific Titles have access to the GHQ for redressal of member's issues.
 
.
Yes, so what
how many violation of constitution are done on daily basis by any govt.
 
.
Gen kiyani s extension was not violation of any thing what a bunch of idiots
 
.
Back
Top Bottom