What's new

Is America undermining Pakistan’s importance as an ally?

illusion8

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
12,232
Reaction score
-20
Country
India
Location
India
United States strategic shift to the Asia Pacific from the Middle East thanks to President Barack Obama’s Asia Pivot has certainly changed the entire Middle Eastern geopolitical calculus.

We are now witnessing a time period when, for the first time in history, the United States is on the verge of becoming energy sufficient as it surpassed Saudi Arabia in oil production in October, 2013. This happened while the wrapping up of military campaigns in the greater Middle East is translating into reduced military spending ergo, reduced military might in the said region.

These two events are significant as they are a contributing factor in the reshaping of the US strategic policy in the Middle East, about which we can make a calculated guess gauging from the current ripples that it has already created.

The US is currently trying to nurture a bipolar Middle East, reshaping it in a way as to create a balance of power between Iran and Saudi Arabia. This was hinted by the signing of the Iran deal that eased sanctions on Iran, thereby, integrating it back into the international economy (though marginally yet it is just a start to a long rearrangement of the jigsaw). In addition, Iran is indirectly being utilised to police Iraq at this point in time to limit Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) while the US Air Force (USAF) is acting as an air support unit to the Iranian revolutionary guards already on the ground.

This unique US-Iranian collaboration is worrisome for the Petro-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and interestingly for Israel as well. This mutual concern has given birth to yet another unique and indeed historic regional alliance between the House of Saud and Israel; albeit, being strictly limited to their mutual interests in the region (animosity to the Muslim brotherhood is one of them).

The Middle East is now looking more like a tug of war between the reluctant albeit important Saudi-Israeli alliance and the more traditional Shia crescent, led by Iran with Iraq, Syria, Hezbollah led Lebanon (and surprisingly Qatar due to its differences with Saudi Arabia and support for Hamas). The picture which emerges then is a bipolar Middle East policed by two power centres, balancing out each other yet both channelling their rivalry for a self-sustainable Middle East, seeking American approval at every stage lest they fall weaker compared to their rivals.

For Pakistan, this rearrangement of the geopolitical chess board of the Middle East is significant since it puts Iran in the lime light with partial American approval. It undermines Pakistan’s importance as the only policing state within the region, which it has to rely upon, on policing Afghanistan. A strong Iran will certainly be used as a policing state in Afghanistan (due to Iran’s animosity with the Taliban), and allow a safe passage route to Central Asia and Afghanistan via the rich Iranian sea ports contrary to Pakistan’s troubled land route, that is often compromised with supplies being torched regularly due to political instability in the country.

The current political turmoil in the country and the uncertainty surrounding the entire region is frightening for many. But amidst all this one has to question, would Pakistan still be a vital ally in the US war on terror? If not, it is indeed a worrying sign for a country with a cache of nuclear weapons.

Is America undermining Pakistan’s importance as an ally? – The Express Tribune Blog
 
.
we dont want to be police..
iran and india should lic uncle sam shoes..
 
.
Not to sound rude or anything ... But did Irans policing in Afghanistan work I the 90s ... ?
 
.
Not to sound rude or anything ... But did Irans policing in Afghanistan work I the 90s ... ?

* US moving towards Iran is good for Pakistan, since we'd be able to get oil and gas pipes from Iran with ease, which will solve our energy crisis.

* Pakistan would be able to sell food, fruits, textile and even military hardware to Iran.

* Iran playing a big role in Afghanistan directly benefits Pakistan as it will allign the Farsi speakers with Iran and Pashtuns towards Pakistan, creating a balance of power.

* A strong Iran won't play soft ball with India and therefore would have to get closer to China economically, bringing Pakistan at the center of Iranian, Chinese trade and business interests.

* Iran being close to US means, the CIA will stop funding terrorist groups in Seestan which will also improve security in Pakistan's Balochistan province.

* Pakistan's alliance with the US, despite our wishes to the contrary will persist for the foreseeable future.
 
.
* US moving towards Iran is good for Pakistan, since we'd be able to get oil and gas pipes from Iran with ease, which will solve our energy crisis.

* Pakistan would be able to sell food, fruits, textile and even military hardware to Iran.

* Iran playing a big role in Afghanistan directly benefits Pakistan as it will allign the Farsi speakers with Iran and Pashtuns towards Pakistan, creating a balance of power.

* A strong Iran won't play soft ball with India and therefore would have to get closer to China economically, bringing Pakistan at the center of Iranian, Chinese trade and business interests.

* Iran being close to US means, the CIA will stop funding terrorist groups in Seestan which will also improve security in Pakistan's Balochistan province.

* Pakistan's alliance with the US, despite our wishes to the contrary will persist for the foreseeable future.
Very good analysis :tup:
 
.
Not really, given the mess in the middle east and Ukraine, and Russia looking for new allies, Pakistan's geo-strategic position has become important as ever.
 
.
*

* A strong Iran won't play soft ball with India and therefore would have to get closer to China economically, bringing Pakistan at the center of Iranian, Chinese trade and business interests.

What on earth does that even mean? Why would a strong Iran not want closer relations with India? What sense is there in an argument that suggests that it won't play "soft ball" with India and therefore will have to do so with China..? If Iran did get close to the U.S., wouldn't logical reasoning suggest that it will lead to more India-Iran relations, not less?
 
.
* US moving towards Iran is good for Pakistan, since we'd be able to get oil and gas pipes from Iran with ease, which will solve our energy crisis.

* Pakistan would be able to sell food, fruits, textile and even military hardware to Iran.

* Iran playing a big role in Afghanistan directly benefits Pakistan as it will allign the Farsi speakers with Iran and Pashtuns towards Pakistan, creating a balance of power.

* A strong Iran won't play soft ball with India and therefore would have to get closer to China economically, bringing Pakistan at the center of Iranian, Chinese trade and business interests.

* Iran being close to US means, the CIA will stop funding terrorist groups in Seestan which will also improve security in Pakistan's Balochistan province.

* Pakistan's alliance with the US, despite our wishes to the contrary will persist for the foreseeable future.

Brother,

What makes you think Iranians are not hegemonic, right-wing nationalists with a superiority complex over Pakistan, Afghanistan and Arabia?

What makes you think we won't see another Ahmedinejad in the near future?

What makes you think the Pakistani and the Arabian militaries trust the Iranian military?

Have we already forgotten how Iran back stabbed Pakistan over the AQ Khan issue?
 
.
Not really, given the mess in the middle east and Ukraine, and Russia looking for new allies, Pakistan's geo-strategic position has become important as ever.

Why would Russia want/need Pakistan as an ally considering the cost-benefit issues that will crop up vis-a-vis India? What "geo strategic" position does Pakistan have to offer Russia?
 
.
The US and Pakistan will always be allies in some way shape or form. The US sees the region as strategic above all else, save the Asian pivot.
 
. .
Why would Russia want/need Pakistan as an ally considering the cost-benefit issues that will crop up vis-a-vis India? What "geo strategic" position does Pakistan have to offer Russia?

Access to warmer ports via Central Asia, which by the way comes before any land route to India. Since there is going to be a power vacuum in Afghanistan, once NATO leaves, Russia along with China would want to have some say over there. It always better to have partnerships than none. Think about it, Russia a mega power, nuclear armed state has lost all it's strategic allies in the middle east. Other that who do they have? India is there economically, but not geo-strategically. India cannot offer the direct access to Middle east ports/gas pipe lines etc that Pakistan can.
 
.
* US moving towards Iran is good for Pakistan, since we'd be able to get oil and gas pipes from Iran with ease, which will solve our energy crisis.

That will depend on Pakistani politicians (Nawaz) who I doubt will do anything like tht and jeopardise their relations with Saudis.
* Pakistan would be able to sell food, fruits, textile and even military hardware to Iran.


Iran is an oil rich country .. And if sanctions are lifted I see them going to eu more than Pakistan for weapons etc..



* Iran playing a big role in Afghanistan directly benefits Pakistan as it will allign the Farsi speakers with Iran and Pashtuns towards Pakistan, creating a balance of power.


Or create the same situation as in the 90s.


* A strong Iran won't play soft ball with India and therefore would have to get closer to China economically, bringing Pakistan at the center of Iranian, Chinese trade and business interests.
They would do what benefits their national interests .. Unlike Pakistan they have an independent foriegn policy..


.[/QUOTE]
* Iran being close to US means, the CIA will stop funding terrorist groups in Seestan which will also improve security in Pakistan's Balochistan province.[/QUOTE]

Would their Saudi pals do the same ?

* Pakistan's alliance with the US, despite our wishes to the contrary will persist for the foreseeable future.

Did i say otherwise? I wish we improve our relations with USA and the west in general ..


P.S:Its still a hypothical situation ... I don't see USA completely lifting sanctions or pressure from Iran.
 
.
Brother,

What makes you think Iranians are not hegemonic, right-wing nationalists with a superiority complex over Pakistan, Afghanistan and Arabia?

What makes you think we won't see another Ahmedinejad in the near future?

What makes you think the Pakistani and the Arabian militaries trust the Iranian military?

Have we already forgotten how Iran back stabbed Pakistan over the AQ Khan issue?

@SUPARCO

Iran won't go hegemonic on Pakistan. We are too big, too powerful and too unpredictable for them to handle. India has failed to establish hegemony on, Pakistan for 7 decades, what makes you think, Iran can, especially when their future prosparity depends on us.

Pakistan needs to follow its interests, support Arabs and Iranians accordingto our own strategic interests. Their competetion can be hanessed for the benefit of Pakistan.

@Bang Galore

A strong Iran will deal with India on pound to pound basis. Hearsay like Chahbahar won't be tolerated, which is good for Pakistan. Strong Iran, Strong Turkey, a Strong Pakistan = A powerful ECO block.
 
.
in international politics there is no brotherhood but only national interests, the day Pakistani start to see beyond this thick brotherhood glass is the day you start looking after your interest, fcuk brotherhood!!

Hahahahahah.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom