What's new

Iran's extremely fast missile

Shahin Vatani

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
2,025
Reaction score
0

Guys check the speed of this missile! The missile is used for the Iranian space agency currently, but there is a rumour that the technology will also be used for air-targets and anti satellites in the future. What do members think? Do any of the Iranians have any more info?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. . .
Nothing special here , maybe the video has been edited to increase frames per second or something. Ballistic missiles ARE supposed to be extremely fast.

High supersonic speed however is not limited to ballistic missiles anymore because , if we look at the Chinese DH-10A Land attack cruise missile , it has a mind boggling range of 2200kms and a speed of mach 4.0 , it can be launched from Land , Under water or sea , this sort of diverse capability is unprecedented for a cruise missile.
 
.
Increasing speed reduces enemy's response time. It is an inverse relationship.

On the other hand, the higher the speed, the less capable in terms of maneuverability, so in the event that the enemy is capable of detecting the missile to give a couple minutes of response time, that response can be to physically counter the missile, or to take steps to reduce the damages, or both.
 
.
Nothing special here , maybe the video has been edited to increase frames per second or something. Ballistic missiles ARE supposed to be extremely fast.

High supersonic speed however is not limited to ballistic missiles anymore because , if we look at the Chinese DH-10A Land attack cruise missile , it has a mind boggling range of 2200kms and a speed of mach 4.0 , it can be launched from Land , Under water or sea , this sort of diverse capability is unprecedented for a cruise missile.

Any proof of that? :coffee:
 
.
Used to go to White sands to watch IHAWK fires....close up you can't follow the missle with your eyes (you would see a big flash...closely followed by one that lit the sky as it hit the target)
 
.
Increasing speed reduces enemy's response time. It is an inverse relationship.

On the other hand, the higher the speed, the less capable in terms of maneuverability, so in the event that the enemy is capable of detecting the missile to give a couple minutes of response time, that response can be to physically counter the missile, or to take steps to reduce the damages, or both.

Gambit, are there missiles out there that maintain a slower speed at lower altitudes (to remain undetected !) till they reach a said-distance from the target and hence maneuver themselves accordingly but as soon as that distance is reached they speed up at an exponentially higher rate to hit the target ! A little like utilizing the element of surprise till the last moment possible and positioning yourself accordingly and finally striking before your enemy can respond back !
 
. . .
Gambit, are there missiles out there that maintain a slower speed at lower altitudes (to remain undetected !) till they reach a said-distance from the target and hence maneuver themselves accordingly but as soon as that distance is reached they speed up at an exponentially higher rate to hit the target ! A little like utilizing the element of surprise till the last moment possible and positioning yourself accordingly and finally striking before your enemy can respond back !
Somewhat redundant. Slow speed does not mean low detectability. Low altitude does. When a missile is below most radar horizon, at the point where the missile's own sensor -- radar or IR or both -- can detect the target, it would be too late for the target precisely because of that low altitude.

When a missile's sensor detect the target at the earliest opportunity, that point in time and in spatial perspective is called 'horizon break'...

Attention North Korea: Aegis Missile Intercept a Success | Aero-News Network
Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems' Kauai-based TPS-X (Transportable Surveillance X-Band) radar tracked the target missile from launch and also tracked the SM-3 from horizon break through target intercept.
This is a two-way street, usually if a defender's radar can detect the missile, most likely the missile's own radar detects the target, so 'horizon break' works both ways.

So for the example above, the sentence 'tracked the SM-3 from horizon break through target intercept.' means the tracking system detected the SM-3 at the moment the missile became visible over the horizon and tracked the missile's flight all the way to intercept. That is what 'horizon break' mean.

Visual distance from one's point to horizon is about 25 km in clear weather.

Horizon calculator - radar and visual

You can use that calculator to estimate the 'horizon break' distance depending on radar antenna height but basically, the higher the defender's radar height, the longer that 'horizon break' distance, and the more the response time. Ground level and the 'horizon break' distance is in the mid 20s km. Against a subsonic threat, the defense will have only a few seconds. Against a supersonic threat, really none at all.
 
.
Iranians are good in graphic works
.11 added 2 frames

But whyyyyyyyyyyyy?
 
.
Iranians probably did it again; One more top achievement "Fastest" missile in the universe.
 
.
Looking in the missile at the end of video, it's quite small one and they are supposed to be fast.

For instance, this is a small missile (Hatf-9 Nasr) and you can look at the speed:


And here is the probably the fastest Ballistic missile in Pakistan's Nuclear arsenal:



P.S

At 0.10 how did suddenly the video got fast-forward? The movement of camera and the sound tells that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
LMAO - Anyone heard of a slow missile? :D

Hey guys, maybe this one escapes the gravity at twice the velocity, but wait, wouldn't that be bad as it would over shoot the insertion orbit? :D
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom